1 edit | reply to btclaz
Re: Training! said by btclaz:For those who don't WANT to go to new technology...There were many like you who only wanted dialup and did not want to make the move to high speed internet. But through time you probably accepted it and now say "I'll never go back to dialup". HD television will be much the same once completed in 2009. In my case, I have had cable based broadband Internet service, since 1998 (my cable company was the 2nd Road Runner in the nation, in 1997, I waited about 9 months before installing and had a 3COM modem).
You should also understand that the digital bill just passed that has a deadline of Februray 18, 2009 does NOT MANDATE HD SERVICE, it just mandates digital service. And in the case of my cable company, they already switched to fully digital this last October. The switch to digital in Februray 2009 will not require that all broadcasters delivery HD content, just that they deliver a digital signal, and they will be required to quit broadcasting analog on specific frequencies, that the FCC wants to auction off. The analog TV signals use the 700MHz frequency band and the wireless companies are salivating over those frequencies.
So, remember that the February 18, 2009 cutoff HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH INCREASING HD CONTENT or BROADCASTS.
And you should also understand that some us early adopters, Betamax 1975, VHS 1979, various small computers from 1978-1983, IBM PC 1983, CD 1985, DirecTV 1994, DVD 1998, Broadband 1998, DVR (TiVo) 2000, and the DirecTV TiVo DVR 2003 (when the price dropped to $99), do not feel the need to buy into HD devices that should not only change a lot over the next decade but also drop to less than half the current cost. And during this same time period, the amount of HD content should increase to the point that investing in HD technology finally makes sense. |
