Jonbo298
join:2004-01-12
Council Bluffs, IA | They know its not... worth the time to fight for it yet. They see criticism so why join it for something thats not even certain to exist.
Maybe the cable companies will use it in their commercials eventually if the Telco's get their ways. Makes for an easy campaign why to choose Cable over DSL or anything else the Telco's use. |
|
 Old_GrouchDon't just sit there silly DO somethingPremium
join:2004-05-26
Greenwood, IN
kudos:1 | The enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Cable wants the same thing and has the same opponents as telcos. Therefore, in this instance, telco is their friend.
Let the telcos fight the early battle with their money. Win and cable wins too. Lose and cable wins because they have a marketing edge for not being the bad guy. |
|
1 edit | reply to Jonbo298
Cable don't have same issues as telcos That is because cable doesn't have the same issues as the telcos. The telcos have a pipe that will have a difficult time delivering TV with IPTV software. And if the telcos want to keep improving the TV product they need lots of money for infrastructure upgrades - therefore their desire to suck some money out of the content providers.
But the cable companies all have big pipes and are already delivering TV content without problem. At least for now, they see no need to soak the content providers to upgrade their infrastructure.
But you can bet your life that if the telcos get away with charging the content providers, the cable companies will take advantage of that in their new contracts with content providers.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
My Web Page |
|
PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR | Cable has been doing it for years ... I bet they're keeping quiet, lest it be noticed that they've been doing this for years. They have a big pipe; they use most of it for delivering high-value content (TV), that they charge an arm and a leg for.
You can bet you'll never get 20+ Mbps, hi-QoS, basic internet access from an MSO. They're not gonna let you bypass them and, say, go directly to HBO.COM for your content. Heck, that would put HBO outta business; you'd go right to the movie producers' sites themselves. |
|
| reply to Jonbo298
Re: They know its not... What the cable companies are doing is saving their lobbying money.
Let the telcos battle this out and if they win, the cable companies can jump on the bandwagon for minimal costs. If they lose, nothing spent. Simple really. |
|
| reply to Jonbo298
said by Jonbo298:They see criticism so why join it for something thats not even certain to exist. If cable is using QOS to prioritize voice traffic over the last mile for their VoIP offering, while third party VoIP slugs it out with data traffic without any similar assistance, doesn't it exist already? |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | Yes they do, and yes it does. They're whistling past the graveyard hoping nobody notices.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
 kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY | reply to PDXPLT
Re: Cable has been doing it for years ... said by PDXPLT:I bet they're keeping quiet, lest it be noticed that they've been doing this for years. They have a big pipe; they use most of it for delivering high-value content (TV), that they charge an arm and a leg for. You can bet you'll never get 20+ Mbps, hi-QoS, basic internet access from an MSO. They're not gonna let you bypass them and, say, go directly to HBO.COM for your content. Heck, that would put HBO outta business; you'd go right to the movie producers' sites themselves. Well, it's not the case with HBO: they DO produce lot of their own content and they DO score homeruns time by time: Sopranos, Sex and The City, Rome or Angels in America or Bill Maher and let's not forget HBO's EXCELLENT documentaries or stand up comedians... HBO would be on the winner side if they could get rid of the middlemen.:) |
|
