<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only) in Comcast HSI</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15267135</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:46:08 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:46:08 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15622360</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>There's a flipside to the "credibility" coin. When someone from MCMD reads that "all outages are fixed within 2 hours", or that "all techs have meters", it appears to us that poster lives in a fantasy.<br> </DIV>It would be interesting to do a survey and comparison of customer service and tech support at each Comcast district.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15622360</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:00:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15620443</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : There's a flipside to the "credibility" coin. When someone from MCMD reads that "all outages are fixed within 2 hours", or that "all techs have meters", it appears to us that poster lives in a fantasy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15620443</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:58:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618524</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1107926"><b>CableTool</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  cbrain <A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I question why Comcast lets our local get away with this behavior.  It reflect poorly on you and all other good reps.<br> </DIV>I agree with all that. Especially the part that says "LOCAL" <br>Its more my issue then anyone elses. Leaving out that word makes statements seem blanket and all encompassing which looses all credibility with most people. <br><SMALL>--<br>*&acute;*)<BR>&cedil;.&#149;&acute;&cedil;.&#149;*') &cedil;.&#149;*.<BR>(&cedil;.&#149;&acute;  (&cedil;.&#149;'<BR>                   <A HREF="http://cablefaq.org/">Technicians -Unplugged</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618524</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:27:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618282</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  CableTool <A HREF="/useremail/u/1107926"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Liz <A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Comcast sponsorship, contributions and free advertising irritate me.  It appears to be a diversion of resources and effort from providing me the service I feel I should be getting from Comcast and I get from other suppliers. <br> </DIV>Wow...<br>It blows my mind that someone can think that they would get a more stable internet connection or a phone answered quicker if  there werent 30 employees "wasting their time" painting a dilapidated Youth center in your community on their day off or if someone wasnt writing a check to help aid some random charity in your community. <br><br>Your humanity and priorities leave something to be desired.<br> </DIV>Take a look at another aspect of this issue.  This is from and article in the Washington Post.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15429562">Post - Comcast's Perks to Montg Leaders Criticized</A><br><br>You help on this forum, probably help with genuine charity work and I'm sure you do an excellent job in the field.  Take a look at this thread.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15567910">Spectacular Buffoonery</A><br><br>I once went to our local Comcast office after failing to resolve several billing errors over 6 months.  The Comcast rep told me she wouldn't go back that far because I didn't inform Comcast in a timely manner.  I gave her several calls with dates and showed her a signed US post office receipt that Comcast had received a letter I sent and noted Comcast had cashed the check sent in the same envelope.  She looked at my documentation but insisted Comcast did not get my letter.  I have several similar incidents where a Comcast Montgomery rep stupidly lied or said something provably wrong, then insisted on it being correct.  I have taken incidents like this to local superiors who excused the behavior.  It gets old.  If a customer treated like this doesn't have a choice of alternative service, perhaps you can understand how they could become skeptical of Comcast motive.  Comcast public sponsorship or charity may then appear only a manipulation.<br><br>I question why Comcast lets our local get away with this behavior.  It reflect poorly on you and all other good reps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618282</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:43:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618101</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1195680"><b>pstauff</b></A> : 2 corrections...<br><br>1) Verizon does not require a contract.  They do provide a discount if you sign a one year contract, however.<br><br>2) Verizon does provide a free security suite.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15618101</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:13:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15617665</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1107926"><b>CableTool</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Liz <A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Comcast sponsorship, contributions and free advertising irritate me.  It appears to be a diversion of resources and effort from providing me the service I feel I should be getting from Comcast and I get from other suppliers. <br> </DIV>Wow...<br>It blows my mind that someone can think that they would get a more stable internet connection or a phone answered quicker if  there werent 30 employees "wasting their time" painting a dilapidated Youth center in your community on their day off or if someone wasnt writing a check to help aid some random charity in your community. <br><br>Your humanity and priorities leave something to be desired.<br><SMALL>--<br>*&acute;*)<BR>&cedil;.&#149;&acute;&cedil;.&#149;*') &cedil;.&#149;*.<BR>(&cedil;.&#149;&acute;  (&cedil;.&#149;'<BR>                   <A HREF="http://cablefaq.org/">Technicians -Unplugged</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15617665</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 14:07:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15617517</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><b>Liz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by mdcitguy :</SMALL><BR><BR>...<br>  I've had Comcast TV service for over 25 years and their internet for around 6 years.  <br><br>I have never had trouble with my service unless there was a massive state emergency blizzard thing where WBAL reported BGE in my area being out. I can count the number of times I have to call Comcast on 1 hand and all of those but 1 were tv calls be cause of squirrels.  We ultimately cut down the squirrel tree and (15 years to today) ever since we havn&#146;t had problems.<br><br>I love how Comcast gives money to College Park for the Comcast Center.  I love all the free advertising and help they give Charities.  I think at least in the Maryland area Comcast makes a heroic effort to better the Maryland communities and think they deserve every cent they make... Really I'd say I think they&#146;re short changing the worth of the service they are providing, but the County agreement is a little pat on the back we can give them each year at least.<br>...<br> </DIV>It is interesting that some users have great service from Verizon, and awful service from Comcast, and another user has just the opposite experience.  This is even after much effort to get the problems with the weaker service resolved.  I have seen enough examples to believe it to be fact.  I'm glad you are not stuck with Verizon and I hope you can understand how I am looking forward to getting Verizon.<br><br>Comcast sponsorship, contributions and free advertising irritate me.  It appears to be a diversion of resources and effort from providing me the service I feel I should be getting from Comcast and I get from other suppliers.  Comcast is buying influence with the politically connected instead of taking care of their paying customers.  It really irritates me when I see constant Comcast adds touting attributes of their services their techs can't provide us long term customers.  Comcast own ads my well contribute to some of the hostility of underserved customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15617517</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:44:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15611149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : "Why do I still have it at work?" <br><br>Because comcast wasn't in baltimore city when the company got broadband. Now the process to switch from verizon to comcast physically would be almost impossible in the building. My company's business office already has a ton of paperwork, and would just love having more paperwork to figure out. Plus the retraining of the entire office would take forever.<br> <br>So to sum it up its more cost effective to have sucky verizon then to have to break their contract and put out all the expense and head ache of converting an entire office of people.  It took me 3 or 4 years to talk them into giving up thier 4 AOL accounts. it would take another 4 years to do a cost benifit analysis to get them to switch.<br>Who knows though. It could happen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15611149</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 13:42:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15609504</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : Hallelujah!  Praise Comcast.  That post was inspirational. <br><br>Imagine living in a land where you were arbitrarily deprived of your choice to get Comcast.  This thread is about helping Comcast and Verizon and others thrive and make customers as happy as you.  Comcast Montgomery is obviously not as good as they are in your county.  I believe competition from Verizon will help Comcast be all they can be and result in them having satisfied customers in our county.  If that doesn&#146;t work out for all, the few will have an alternative and second chance at the bliss you feel.<br><br>PS&#133;Why do you still have Verizon at work?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15609504</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:44:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15608905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Well I don't know about anyone else, but I'm in Maryland I have Comcast at my home and Verizon at work, and don't want Verizon internet service anywhere in my state! <br><br>Verizon is horrible. I tried their biz service and at the end of the first year they dumped our services over to an out source. I canceled my biz account after that, but they still send me biz crap as if I still get the service.  <br><br>They require a contract and will charge you a cancel fee if you cancel the service any time in the year.   <br><br>-- No Contracts with Comcast.<br><br>Verizon charges for security software.  Comcast doesn&#146;t. You get it include with the service free.<br><br>With Verizon, when I had trouble with my phone wiring it&#146;s the same junk.  &#147;Unplug  all phones in your house, unplug the phone connections and plug them back in&#133; oh it didn&#146;t work? Then go out in the freezing cold and plug a phone in the phone box. Getting a dial tone?  Call a contractor or pay for someone to fix it.&#148;  <br><br>-- Comcast &#150; schedule an appointment, a Cable guy came out and fixed it. In 20 minutes.  Only have had to have 1 cable guy out for service ever for internet, and it was my first time with @home. I was trying to put in a RF modulator for a security camera and the crappy 1 way amp I had was causing feedback.  The cable tech took out the amp and put in a single tap. No trouble six years late.  All done, free.<br><br>  I've had Comcast TV service for over 25 years and their internet for around 6 years.  <br><br>I have never had trouble with my service unless there was a massive state emergency blizzard thing where WBAL reported BGE in my area being out. I can count the number of times I have to call Comcast on 1 hand and all of those but 1 were tv calls be cause of squirrels.  We ultimately cut down the squirrel tree and (15 years to today) ever since we havn&#146;t had problems.<br><br>I love how Comcast gives money to College Park for the Comcast Center.  I love all the free advertising and help they give Charities.  I think at least in the Maryland area Comcast makes a heroic effort to better the Maryland communities and think they deserve every cent they make... Really I'd say I think they&#146;re short changing the worth of the service they are providing, but the County agreement is a little pat on the back we can give them each year at least.<br><br>As far as FIOS goes for me speed isn't really a big deal.<br>Verizon will need to give away the service before I ever change my internet or phone service.  <br><br>For me Verizon will need to go a long way  and play catch up for decades to earn their right to be a member in my community. -- It will take more then just changing a few wires for that to happen.<br><br>Verizon free since 05'  Rock on Comcast!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15608905</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:36:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15607638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><b>Liz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  briankelly9 <A HREF="/useremail/u/687068"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>comcast monopoly ?? when did that come out ?<br> </DIV>I believe in Montgomery County, it was the summer of 2000.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15607638</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2006 22:05:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15521545</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I'm not the least bit surprised. Are you?<br><br>I hope the lack of a reply that doesn't stop anyone from writing. The more letters they receive, the harder it will be to delay.<br>...<br> </DIV>Montgomery County Executive Doug Duncan has published the below customer service standards regarding response to email.  He is waging a come from behind campaign for governor. I find it interesting that he still can't come up with a response to voters regarding the Verizon Franchise that is better than neglecting to respond in any way.  <br><br>How many letters will it take to make an impression on him?<br><br>------------------------------------<br>Offices of the County Executive OCE Home  <br> <br>CUSTOMER SERVICE STANDARDS<br><br>Standards for Written Communication<br><br>...<br><br>Formal E-Mail<br><br>1. Respond to general customer e-mail within two (2) business days. <br><br>2. For email inquiries that cannot be fully responded to within two (2) business days, acknowledge receipt of the customer&iexcl;&brvbar;s inquiry within two (2) days. This acknowledgement will include the estimated time for a complete response.<br><br>3. Include a signature block that lists the employee&iexcl;&brvbar;s full name, title, department or office, address, telephone number, fax number and e-mail address. <br><br>4. Eliminate the use of background color or wallpaper in e-mail. <br><br>5. Eliminate the use of nonverbal symbols or signage in formal e-mail (e.g., &#131;&ordm;).<br><br>6. Send hyperlinks to web pages to minimize cutting and pasting large amount of data within e-mail correspondences whenever possible. <br><br>7. Check and discard e-mail regularly so your mailbox is never full and unable to accept additional e-mail. <br><br>8. When on leave, make arrangements to forward e-mail to supervisors or coworkers or to block e-mail so the senders receive an acknowledgement of the receipt of their e-mail and anticipated time for a response.<br> <br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtmpl.asp?url=/content/exec/CustomerService/WrittenCommunication.asp" >www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtm&middot;&middot;&middot;tion.asp</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15521545</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:31:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15520749</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : I'm not the least bit surprised. Are you?<br><br>I hope the lack of a reply that doesn't stop anyone from writing. The more letters they receive, the harder it will be to delay.<br><br>Remember: if you're a Comcast customer, even if you don't plan to switch to FiOS, it will still be in your best interest to have VZ fiber in your 'hood (<B>think 16MB upgrade</B>). So keep the letters flowing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15520749</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:50:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15520085</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1003397"><b>BarneyBadAss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Nope - I got no reply from Duncan or Denis.<br> </DIV>And I suppose you are surprised by this???????? Hmmmmm..... <br><SMALL>--<br> ---Barney</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15520085</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 15:24:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15517557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Nope - I got no reply from Duncan or Denis.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15517557</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:53:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15504973</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><b>Liz</b></A> : Did anyone get a reply from Duncan or the council?  <br><br>Negotiations Going From None To Worse -  <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.libes.com/don/blog/" >www.libes.com/don/blog/</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15504973</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 10:36:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15469276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : The council doesn't appear to be any better informed than the county cable office or the rest of us.  No wonder we have achieved such cable mediocrity. :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15469276</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:27:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467158</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  cbrain <A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I found this posted 6-14-2005 - OT: Praisner said Verizon and the county are "actively negotiating" a franchise agreement, and it should be awarded "shortly".<br><br>This was after the council hearing extending 28-02.  Verizon was present.</DIV>Compare Praisner's comment from 8 months ago against what she said during last week's MFP meeting</A>.<div class="bquote"><B>Verizon VP Briana Gowing</B>: <I>At one point it looked like we are at a little bit of a standstill. But we are very optimistic that we can work with the county executive's office and get a series of scheduled meetings going and work together and I'd really like to come before you next time and have an agreement for you to look at.</I><br><br><B>MC Councilmember Marilyn Praisner</B>: <I>All you have to do is take the existing agreement and modify it and give us your suggestions and modifications to the existing agreement - that has worked very well with Comcast and RCN - so I would urge you to do that as I will urge other representatives of Verizon when I meet with them soon.</I></DIV>Here's some <A HREF="http://www.libes.com/don/blog">more detail</A> about what else was said at the MFP meeting. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15467158</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:44:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15433755</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : I'd guess the recording counts for the first 30 second requirement, but not the second. As far as I know, the figures are not audited in any way. The cable operator is taken at their word.<br><br>Below are our cable <B>modem</B> customer service standards, and our cable <B>television</B> customer service standards in regards to answering the telephone. I've emphasized the differences.<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by MCMD cable <B>modem</B> customer service standards<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/cableoffice/cablemodemexecreg.pdf" >www.montgomerycountymd.gov/conte&middot;&middot;&middot;creg.pdf</A> :</SMALL><HR>...<br>(3) Under Normal Operating Conditions, the following standards shall be met by the cable operator at least <B>seventy five (75) percent</B> of the time, measured quarterly.<br><br>(A) Telephone answering time shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds, and the time to transfer the call to a customer service representative (including hold time) shall not exceed an additional thirty (30) seconds.<br><br>(B) A customer will receive a busy signal less than three percent (3%) of the time.<br><br>(C) When the business office is closed, an answering machine or service capable of receiving and recording service complaints and inquiries shall be employed. Inquiries received after hours must be responded to by a trained representative of the <B>cable operator</B> on the next business day. To the extent possible, the after-hours answering service shall comply with the same telephone answer time standard set forth in this Section.<br>...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><HR><br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by MCMD cable <B>television</B> customer service standards<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtmpl.asp?url=/content/cableOffice/June98franchise.asp" >www.montgomerycountymd.gov/mcgtm&middot;&middot;&middot;hise.asp</A> :</SMALL><HR>...<br>(3) Under Normal Operating Conditions, the following standards shall be met by the Franchisee at least <B>ninety (90) percent</B> of the time, measured quarterly.<br><br>(A) Telephone answering time shall not exceed thirty (30) seconds, and the time to transfer the call to a customer service representative (including hold time) shall not exceed an additional thirty (30) seconds.<br><br>(B) A customer will receive a busy signal less than three percent (3%) of the time.<br><br>(C) When the business office is closed, an answering machine or service capable of receiving and recording service complaints and inquiries shall be employed. Inquiries received after hours must be responded to by a trained representative of the <B>Franchisee</B> on the next business day. To the extent possible, the after-hours answering service shall comply with the same telephone answer time standard set forth in this Section.<br>...<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15433755</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:24:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15431835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> ... I asked if it was the CCC but she ignored the question and suggested it was things like the 30/60 second telephone response.  I think this may be an important distinction because the customer service regs are what appear to make FIOS Internet into a Title 6ish service, subject to local regs - which is something Verizon doesn't want to hear.  ... </DIV>What does "30/60telephone response" mean?  I'll assume the 30 is time to answer.  Does the recorded IVR qualify?  I would think Comcast would get 100% on that.  What is the 60 and when does the timer start?  If that is the time to speak to a rep from the time the call is answered, Comcast has failed me 100%.  Are the figures audited or verified in any way?  Under oath at least?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15431835</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:10:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426858</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : If this was the way they enforced traffic laws, I'd drive a faster car. ;) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426858</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:11:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426373</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  meb <A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Does Prince Georges, Howard or Fairfax track complaints like Montgomery?  Where can I get this data?</DIV>You can get the freshly posted Q4 numbers for Comcast here:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/council/compackets/060209/20060209_mfp04.pdf" >www.montgomerycountymd.gov/conte&middot;&middot;&middot;fp04.pdf</A><br><br>Comcast still hasn't submitted the summer FCC proofs, they didn't do so well on the FCC monitor tests, and they still haven't figured out how to properly ground a drop, but they've made some significant improvements. For example, the average time to correct a problem serious enough to be classified as an "alert" has dropped to 22 days. Of course, the franchise agreement requires "alerts" to be corrected within 7 days, but an average of 22 days (or even 50 days, like Q3) isn't bad enough to get fined or anything.<br><br>Regarding Comcast's refusal to comply with our cable modem customer service standards for the entire year, the county issued a "notice of violation" and threatened "liquidated damages".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15426373</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:14:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15425437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>I have not been contacted by the Exec but I did get a call from Verizon (who, I'm not prepared to identify at the moment).  She could not speak authoritatively but said: Verizon very much wants the franchise however the problem is the issue of Executive Reg 26-03, which were the regs that require internet service to include the same customer service standards as TV service.  (26-03 was the Executive's response to 28-02.)<br><br>I asked if it was the CCC but she ignored the question and suggested it was things like the 30/60 second telephone response.  I think this may be an important distinction because the customer service regs are what appear to make FIOS Internet into a Title 6ish service, subject to local regs - which is something Verizon doesn't want to hear.  (Of course Comcast didn't want to hear it either but ...)<br><br>At this point I'm trying to recollect whether the regs were extended because, as I recall, they had a sunset period that was 12/05 - in which case it could be disposed of that way.  Does anyone recall offhand? ...<br> </DIV>I found this posted 6-14-2005 - OT: Praisner said Verizon and the county are "actively negotiating" a franchise agreement, and it should be awarded "shortly".<br><br>This was after the council hearing extending 28-02.  Verizon was present.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,13657038?">Re: Montgomery County MD Bill 7-05</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15425437</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:19:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : Population<br><br>267K Howard<br>922K Montgomery]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:22:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421618</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Johkal <A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I wonder what the population figures are for Montgomery,MD vs the other areas mentioned?</DIV>I think Montgomery County MD, Fairfax <I>County</I> (not city), and probably Prince Georges County are all pretty close. Howard County is probably less than half the population of MCMD.<br><br>Just guessing... don't hold me to it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421618</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:06:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  meb <A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Does Prince Georges, Howard or Fairfax track complaints like Montgomery?  Where can I get this data?</DIV>I'd bet these counties all have similar customer service standards in their franchise agreement as ours for cable television. I'm not sure whether PG tracks complaints, but it looks like Howard does. I posted contact info if you want to follow up.<br><br><B>Prince Georges</B><br><br>ComcastWatch.com posted some dirt about PG county a while back. Yes I know they're not a very objective source, but they didn't produce the PG County inspection report: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.comcastwatch.com/consumer/page.jsp?itemID=27032966" >www.comcastwatch.com/consumer/pa&middot;&middot;&middot;27032966</A><br><br>During my search for PG county contact information, I found these blogs from PG county residents. From reading these, my guess is that PG county gets the same level of customer service as we do:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://brand.blogs.com/mantra/2005/02/i_hate_comcast.html" >brand.blogs.com/mantra/2005/02/i&middot;&middot;&middot;ast.html</A><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ripoffreport.com/view.asp?id=62521&view=printer" >www.ripoffreport.com/view.asp?id&middot;&middot;&middot;=printer</A><br><br>You might try contacting these folks to see if PG county tracks Comcast complaints:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.co.pg.md.us/Government/BoardsCommissions/cable.asp?h=20&s=&n=40" >www.co.pg.md.us/Government/Board&middot;&middot;&middot;&s=&n=40</A><br><br><B>Howard</B><br><br>Here's a topic from another discussion board with some articles from the Baltimore Sun describing Howard County's negotiations:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.satelliteguys.us/showthread.php?t=50100" >www.satelliteguys.us/showthread.php?t=50100</A><br><br>This article from the Washington Post indicates that Howard tracks complaints ("But in Howard County, complaints against Comcast have dropped 50 percent in the first half of the year compared with the same time last year, said Dean Smits, the county&#146;s cable administrator."): &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.freepress.net/news/print.php?id=9201" >www.freepress.net/news/print.php?id=9201</A><br><br>Some background on Smits: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA403476.html" >www.multichannel.com/article/CA403476.html</A><br><br>You can find contact information for Smits here:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.co.ho.md.us/hc%5Fpublicofficials.htm" >www.co.ho.md.us/hc%5Fpublicofficials.htm</A><br><br><B>Fairfax</B> is served by Cox.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421584</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 10:01:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><b>Johkal</b></A> : I wonder what the population figures are for Montgomery,MD vs the other areas mentioned? <br><br>Montgomery ---- 2806<br>Baltimore -------- 588<br>Howard ---------- 342<br>Washington DC --- 238<br>Alexandria ------- 186<br>Fairfax ---------- 129<br>Prince Georges ---- 43<br>Herndon ---------- 10<br><br>Just curious. <br><SMALL>--<br>Write me up for 125.......I Can't Drive 55   &raquo;<A HREF="http://redrocker.com/" >redrocker.com/</A>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://cabowabo.com/" >cabowabo.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:58:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : That's true,  Johkal <A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>. And while  cbrain <A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s unscientific search might not prove it, there's no denying that Comcast's performance is much shabbier in MD than it is in many other areas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421547</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:55:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421365</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/720248"><b>Johkal</b></A> : You are aware that there is more than one "Montgomery County" in Comcast's network? :)<br><br>Total posts in any search includes topics that are informative, question oriented and positive & not just issue related. :)<br><SMALL>--<br>Write me up for 125.......I Can't Drive 55   &raquo;<A HREF="http://redrocker.com/" >redrocker.com/</A>  &raquo;<A HREF="http://cabowabo.com/" >cabowabo.com/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421365</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:22:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421311</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : Does Prince Georges, Howard or Fairfax track complaints like Montgomery?  Where can I get this data?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15421311</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 09:13:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15416530</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : It has always seemed to me that Montgomery County has more issues than other similar jurisdictions.  I did a few unscientific searches of the 2 Comcast forums.  I recorded the totals, but did not look at the results.  Below are some totals:<br><br>Montgomery ---- 2806<br>Baltimore -------- 588<br>Howard  ---------- 342<br>Washington DC --- 238<br>Alexandria    ------- 186<br>Fairfax  ---------- 129<br>Prince Georges ---- 43<br>Herndon ---------- 10<br><br>Philadelphia ---- 1576<br>New York ------- 463<br>Chicago ------- 6670]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15416530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:33:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415749</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Does anyone know if Verizon expressed concern over the cable TV customer service standards too, or just the cable modem standards? If Verizon balked at the cable TV customer service standards, would anyone be in favor of eliminating them?<br><br>I'd be more easily swayed to eliminate cable TV customer service standards than I would the cable modem standards, since the satellite providers offer effective video competition - a "rule of 3s" so-to-speak.<br> </DIV>Excellent point but it was just the cable modem standards that Verizon objected to.<br><br>Personally, I'd agree with your conclusion but for different reasons - reliable internet service is simply more important than reliable TV service.  (It is worth contrasting this with the FCC view - which is that landline phone service is more reliable than cable TV service which is more reliable than wireless phone.  I'm not aware that wireless phone has *any* reliability regulations - something I've always found mystifying.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415749</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:48:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415655</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Once Verizon deploys fiber, there won't likely be a 3rd provider in a very very long time, if ever (ever hear of a fiber overbuild?). Unlike with DSL, where 3rd parties could piggy-back, you'll have a choice of only two: Comcast or Verizon.<br><br>Do you think two is enough to create a competitive market? Personally, I don't. I think we're just as likely to get two duds - particularly if the new entrant is balking over the cable modem standards, and the entrenched incumbent flat-out ignores them. If we had three providers, I'd strongly support removing any and all customer service standards.<br><br>Does anyone know if Verizon expressed concern over the cable TV customer service standards too, or just the cable modem standards? If Verizon balked at the cable TV customer service standards, would anyone be in favor of eliminating them?<br><br>I'd be more easily swayed to eliminate cable TV customer service standards than I would the cable modem standards, since the satellite providers offer effective video competition - a "rule of 3s" so-to-speak.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415655</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:35:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415632</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  meb <A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>It seems we got into this because our leaders were too weak to confront Comcast or refuse the franchise transfer until customer service improved.  If they can't find a timely solution we may be better off with the state or FCC taking control.  I see more complaints in this forum from Montgomery than other counties.  I read the county complaints are increasing.   What are the county leaders doing for us?<br> </DIV>Indeed, one might say that we are now cutting off our nose to spite our face by refusing to, ahem, lower the standards.<br><br>We should recognize that Comcast *still* hasn't turned over their HSI statistics for judging compliance to the customer service requirements.  So it's almost absurd to hold Verizon to a standard that the county isn't willing to hold Comcast to!<br><br>("Almost absurd" may not be the right phrase but I'm having difficult finding something better to describe the weird situation this has become.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415632</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 15:32:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Verizon attends Comcast's quarterly reviews - where Comcast pretty much thumbs their nose at the council in regards to the cable modem customer service standards. They know how lightly (if at all) these meager standards are enforced.<br><br>Do we really want another provider in our ROW who thinks our current standards are "too tough"?<br> </DIV>Do you think regulation is the only reason a company would provide good customer service?  I get good service from most companies I deal with.  Comcast was an exception.  I worked with Comcast to make things better, and failed.  I worked with the county, and got little success.  I worked with you to help get 28-02 passed.  I still did not get good customer service from Comcast.  I chose new providers and now get good service.<br><br>We gave it a good shot, and failed.  Time to try something new.  Give others a choice.<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  login name <A HREF="/useremail/u/184110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>What is a frappr?<br> </DIV>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.frappr.com/thelibeslibation" >www.frappr.com/thelibeslibation</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15415244</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 14:31:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414955</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>2) The complex part is the legal issues - revolving around the issues I mentioned in my previous posting in the thread - that signing a TV franchise in MC automatically makes an internet provider subject to certain cable TV regs, regs that exist because of Comcast's problems in MC. So a big question is whether the Comcast HSI regs should be dropped when (or rather, if) Verizon ever signs a TV franchise.</DIV>So, in order to let Verizon in the door, we have to agree to let them provide customer service that's worse than what we have?<br><br>Verizon attends Comcast's quarterly reviews - where Comcast pretty much thumbs their nose at the council in regards to the cable modem customer service standards. They know how lightly (if at all) these meager standards are enforced.<br><br>Do we really want another provider in our ROW who thinks our current standards are "too tough"?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414955</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:51:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414933</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/184110"><b>login name</b></A> : What is a frappr?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414933</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:48:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/455626"><b>sortofageek</b></A> : Thank you, Don, for clarifying.<br><br>Folks, some are interested in this topic and that's ok.  Others are not.  That is ok, too.  In the latter case, I suggest clicking on a topic of more interest to you.<br><br>Thanks to all for your cooperation. :)<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="/forum/remark,13801705">  Team Helix Feb 2006 Roll Call </A> - <A HREF="/forum/folding">Team Helix Forum</A> - <A HREF="/metashare/4c7b76"> My F@H Farm </A> - <A HREF="/faq/2913/">Join Us?</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414731</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:22:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414715</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Liz <A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by verizon  :</SMALL><BR><BR>is there a reason you guys are carrying on a MCMD political thread in a comcast forum. dont you guys have email ? <br> </DIV>Because it is the politics of cable in Montgomery County.  Approving a Verizon TV franchise will have a very positive impact on Comcast customers.<br> </DIV>I'll expand on Liz's answer:<br><br>The connection between the issue of Verizon TV and Comcast HSI is two-fold:<br><br>1) The simple part is that lack of Verizon TV is what many Comcast HSI subs are waiting for to give up their CHSI service (because of the $15 bundling penalty that Comcast charges).<br><br>2) The complex part is the legal issues - revolving around the issues I mentioned in my previous posting in the thread - that signing a TV franchise in MC automatically makes an internet provider subject to certain cable TV regs, regs that exist because of Comcast's problems in MC. So a big question is whether the Comcast HSI regs should be dropped when (or rather, if) Verizon ever signs a TV franchise.<br><br>As for not using email, we're posting here for numerous reasons, not the least of which is that LOTS of people are following the discussion and no one knows all their email addresses.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414715</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:19:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414703</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>...She could not speak authoritatively but said: Verizon very much wants the franchise however the problem is the issue of Executive Reg 26-03, which were the regs that require internet service to include the same customer service standards as TV service.  (26-03 was the Executive's response to 28-02.)... </DIV>So the poor performance by Comcast that led to the regs, is now shielding Comcast from competition which would make the regs unnecessary?<br><br>It seems we got into this because our leaders were too weak to confront Comcast or refuse the franchise transfer until customer service improved.  If they can't find a timely solution we may be better off with the state or FCC taking control.  I see more complaints in this forum from Montgomery than other counties.  I read the county complaints are increasing.   What are the county leaders doing for us?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15414703</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><b>Liz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by verizon :</SMALL><BR><BR>is there a reason you guys are carrying on a MCMD political thread in a comcast forum. dont you guys have email ? <br> </DIV>Because it is the politics of cable in Montgomery County.  Approving a Verizon TV franchise will have a very positive impact on Comcast customers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412986</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:09:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412951</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : is there a reason you guys are carrying on a MCMD political thread in a comcast forum. dont you guys have email ? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412951</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:48:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412929</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1107926"><b>CableTool</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  login name <A HREF="/useremail/u/184110"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>nm<br> </DIV>For what its worth I COMPLETELY agreed with you. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412929</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:31:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Bill 7-05 extended the sunset date to December 2008.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/content/council/SCANNED_LEGISLATION/7-05.pdf" >www.montgomerycountymd.gov/conte&middot;&middot;&middot;7-05.pdf</A><br><br>What is Verizon afraid of? Does Verizon think there are actual consequences to not answering calls in 30/60 seconds? Does Verizon know that Comcast doesn't even bother to give the county the call center statistics on cable modem service?<br><br>Ah well. Maybe it's time to consider a municipal network.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15412923</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 06:26:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15411996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/184110"><b>login name</b></A> : nm]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15411996</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 00:02:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Explanation from Verizon</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15411347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : I have not been contacted by the Exec but I did get a call from Verizon (who, I'm not prepared to identify at the moment).  She could not speak authoritatively but said: Verizon very much wants the franchise however the problem is the issue of Executive Reg 26-03, which were the regs that require internet service to include the same customer service standards as TV service.  (26-03 was the Executive's response to 28-02.)<br><br>I asked if it was the CCC but she ignored the question and suggested it was things like the 30/60 second telephone response.  I think this may be an important distinction because the customer service regs are what appear to make FIOS Internet into a Title 6ish service, subject to local regs - which is something Verizon doesn't want to hear.  (Of course Comcast didn't want to hear it either but ...)<br><br>At this point I'm trying to recollect whether the regs were extended because, as I recall, they had a sunset period that was 12/05 - in which case it could be disposed of that way.  Does anyone recall offhand?<br><br>So if this is really is the issue, it might well be the council that has to revisit the county code.  Otherwise, the Exec may feel that he is right in requiring Verizon to abide by the current laws.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15411347</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:21:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15389833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : I did not. I wrote to Duncan today. I suspect I'll get the same "stock" response (from the cable office) that everyone else got.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15389833</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:09:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15387240</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>...<br>So I wrote to the Councilmember for my district. Haven't heard back yet.  ...<br> </DIV><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>... I asked Keith to send it back to the Executive with a request that they answer it themselves.  He said he would.  ...<br> </DIV>Did either of you get a response?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15387240</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 15:52:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15386632</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>If you get the chance, would you ask if there's any chance MCT content will be broadcast on DirecTV or Dish?</DIV>I put this question to Richard Turner, Executive Director of MCT.  He said that it ain't gonna happen - the satellites want $1,000,000 in carriage fees per year per channel.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15386632</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 14:27:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15356919</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/167641"><b>Liz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>...<br>I will select a winner next Wednesday evening based on the number of billing and HSI complaints received by the LFA for December.  Complete details at my blog:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.libes.com/don/blog" >www.libes.com/don/blog</A><br> </DIV>What is happening with the complaints?  Are they still going up?  How about the bickering between Comcast and Verizon?<br><br>This is and interesting and important topic.  I don't think many will find it buried under "Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)"  It probably belongs in the Fios forum but most interest will be here with Comcast users.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15356919</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:38:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15340878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : I would give Verizon TV a try but more than that, I think we need competition in the county.  I feel both Comcast and Montgomery County have failed citizens.  In 20 years nothing has improved.  I think Comcast is worse than the predecessors.  I don't see anything improving without competition and now our representatives seem to be keeping a viable competitor out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15340878</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:22:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15337799</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Frankly I'm not at all interested in television.<br><br>But I'm terribly interested in VZ getting a television franchise.<br><br>btw - I haven't heard anything back from Denis.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15337799</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:46:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15337251</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>...<br>On the other hand, he is running for governor.  And some people think that's exactly why he may be stalling on the franchise.  As I mentioned in my <A HREF="http://libes.com/don/blog">blog</A>, this may be a tit for tat situation.  I don't have any proof of that; but I don't know of any better explanations.<br> </DIV>I spoke with J*L* of the county cable office about 2 months ago.  She told me Verizon was the problem and was not getting back to the county.  She speculated Verizon might be waiting for a statewide franchise.  Then Howard County reached agreement with Verizon..  I sent an email to Duncan&#146;s office this afternoon asking the status.<br><br>How many are interested in Verizon TV?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15337251</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15326488</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : End of 2006, I believe.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15326488</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:50:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15326168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : When is Duncan's term up?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15326168</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:12:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15325234</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : I'm not aware of anything that would legally compel the Executive to take action on this issue.  And since he's not running for re-election, he's not even accountable to the voters who elected him.<br><br>On the other hand, he is running for governor.  And some people think that's exactly why he may be stalling on the franchise.  As I mentioned in my <A HREF="http://libes.com/don/blog">blog</A>, this may be a tit for tat situation.  I don't have any proof of that; but I don't know of any better explanations.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15325234</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:13:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15325105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : You make it sound like there is no accountability in this process.  What is the protocol here?  Can the county executive simply take control and do nothing?  What can be done to put pressure on everyone?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15325105</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:54:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15323384</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I'm not sure if I should post the response, since it's personal correspondence. Think it's ok to post the reply, if I omit the name?<br> </DIV>Don't post it - your summary was clear enough.<br><br>Ok, I just sent her an email (thanks for the addy) asking for more information specifically about the negotiations and pointing out that leaning on the council is unlikely to be useful.  I'll report back if I hear anything.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15323384</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:25:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15322503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : I wrote to Christy Reap (addy found <B><U><A HREF="http://newscenter.verizon.com/proactive/newsroom/release.vtml?id=93200">here</A></U></B>).<br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by JT's letter to Christy :</SMALL><HR>Greetings Christy Reap,<br><br>I read the press release you issued January 18 about FiOS in Damascus and Gaithersburg. I am excited that Verizon is deploying FiOS in parts of Montgomery County. Hopefully, my neighborhood will not be forgotten.<br><br>I live in Randolph Hills, served by the Verizon office on Montrose Road. Although Verizon's database indicates DSL is available here, it is not. Due to the distance we live from the Montrose Road office (19,600 cable feet), DSL is simply not possible. DSL is available to some parts of my community, but not at my home.<br><br>This is why I have such high hopes that Verizon will deploy FiOS here - the sooner the better! Unfortunately, Doug Breisch (manager of Rockville's Department of Technology Services) will not issue permits to Verizon for FiOS upgrades within Rockville city limits until Verizon obtains a television franchise.<br><br>Do you have any information about the status of the television franchise with Montgomery County? Do you know when Verizon plans to offer FiOS from the Montrose Road office? I signed up to receive notifications from Verizon about a year-and-a-half ago, but I have never heard anything.<br><br>Regards,<br>J* T*<br>{Full Address and Phone}<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>But Christy isn't who I got a response from. I'm not sure if I should post the response, since it's personal correspondence. Think it's ok to post the reply, if I omit the name?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15322503</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:49:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320800</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : I got a response from the Exec today - well, sort of.  Keith Watkins in the cable office sent me email saying discussions are "ongoing."  Sure.  I called up and said "oh really?" and outlined the contrary opinions I had heard from his colleagues.<br><br>He immediately agreed that he wasn't "in the loop."  I figure what happened was that the Exec's secretary saw that the request said something about cable and simply redirected it to the cable office.  I asked Keith to send it back to the Executive with a request that they answer it themselves.  He said he would.<br><br>I'll let you know if I hear anything more.<br><br>By the way, who did you write to at Verizon?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320800</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 19:16:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Denis is my Councilmember. He also happens to be on the MFP committee. In fairness, I just wrote to him this morning -  I didn't really expect a same-day reply.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320466</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:38:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320393</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>* shrugs *<br><br>I wrote to Verizon and asked what their plans are, because I'm concerned that they've forgotten all about Randolph Hills. VZ replied right away, and asked me to voice my concerns to the council.<br><br>So I wrote to the Councilmember for my district. Haven't heard back yet.<br><br>According to Don's blog, VZ isn't interested in negotiating. But judging by the quickness of the reply I got, I'd say VZ is very interested. Why would VZ ask me to bug the Councilmembers if VZ had no intention of negotiating with them? It makes no sense.<br> </DIV>Well, the council can lean on executive - but not with much force.<br><br>It's possible that what we're seeing is simply a recalcitrant Duncan, an executive who's got plans that Verizon doesn't fit into - at least not in the short term.  That's the only way this all fits together.  <br><br>By the way, to which councilmember did you write?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320393</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:31:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : * shrugs *<br><br>I wrote to Verizon and asked what their plans are, because I'm concerned that they've forgotten all about Randolph Hills. VZ replied right away, and asked me to voice my concerns to the council.<br><br>So I wrote to the Councilmember for my district. Haven't heard back yet.<br><br>According to Don's blog, VZ isn't interested in negotiating. But judging by the quickness of the reply I got, I'd say VZ is very interested. Why would VZ ask me to bug the Councilmembers if VZ had no intention of negotiating with them? It makes no sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15320330</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:22:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15318314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/735865"><b>meb</b></A> : Why not start it here and see where it goes.<br><br>I think we need to let our county officials know we expect more from them.  Why is Montgomery falling so far behind in FiOS TV?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15318314</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:09:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15294347</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : I realize that this is not the right forum in which to discuss the outcome of the meeting.  Should we take it to one of the existing MC threads in the Comcast HSI forum, in the Verizon forum, or in the TV forum.  It kinda touches on all of them so it's not clear where to put it.  (DC forum too!)  I wish dslr allowed cross-posting!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15294347</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:22:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15274494</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/160346"><b>cbrain</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by GeeWonderWhy :</SMALL><BR><BR>Gee, I wonder why. You seem to find things to complain about. That company could make everything perfect, yet you would still complain. Get a hobby, something positive, to take up your time.<br> </DIV>I sounded like this for about 5 years.  Last March I left Comcast for FiOS and DTV.  The only complaining I've done this year was about Comcast billing me for equipment I did not have  I confirmed there were no outstanding issues or equipment when I terminated Comcast service.  And there were 2 incidents with my mothers Comcast account when they billed her for equipment she did not have.  She won't talk with Comcast anymore.<br><br>DTV and Verizon, no complaints - no Comcast, 3 complaints.  Go figure. :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15274494</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:09:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15274067</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DonLibes <A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tender <A HREF="/useremail/u/232047"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>... and the customer service rep began to argue with me and hung up!</DIV>I'll bet I've been hung up on by more Comcast CAEs than almost anyone.  (Well, not sure about JT.)<br> </DIV>Actually, I don't think I've ever been hung up on by Comcast. Of course, I never bothered to argue with a CAE. If I got the wrong answer, I immediately made use of the county complaint process. It's one thing to be a volunteer auditor for Comcast's billing department - at least there's somewhat of a financial incentive - but it's unreasonable to have to train a CAE just to get a correct bill.<br><br>Sadly, I don't think I can make it tonight - the MCT tour is really coooool. I look forward to reading about it in your blog.<br><br>If you get the chance, would you ask if there's any chance MCT content will be broadcast on DirecTV or Dish?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15274067</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 16:15:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15273116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tender <A HREF="/useremail/u/232047"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>... and the customer service rep began to argue with me and hung up!</DIV>I'll bet I've been hung up on by more Comcast CAEs than almost anyone.  (Well, not sure about JT.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15273116</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 14:25:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15272411</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/232047"><b>tender</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Are those of us who are not Comcast TV subscribers eligible for anything (other than peace of mind and decent service)?<br> </DIV>JT I don't think you really want to use Comcast ;)  On my last bill, I noticed I was charged $3 for an additional cable box, but I only have one.  I called Comcast this morning to have the charge removed, and the customer service rep began to argue with me and hung up!  After my second call, I got the bill charge removed.  Come on FIOS....<br><br>-tender]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15272411</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:59:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15272240</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  JTRockville <A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Are those of us who are not Comcast TV subscribers eligible for anything (other than peace of mind and decent service)?<br> </DIV>Peace of mind sounds good to me.  (Why do you think I can't use this coupon myself?!)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15272240</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:40:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15267549</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/573391"><b>JTRockville</b></A> : Are those of us who are not Comcast TV subscribers eligible for anything (other than peace of mind and decent service)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15267549</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:46:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Free On Demand Movie (MCMD only)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15267135</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : One day left to enter the drawing for a free movie.  I'll make the selection at the end of the <A HREF="http://libes.com/don/blog">CCAC meeting tomorrow evening</A> based on Comcast's complaint numbers received by the county.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15267135</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:47:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Cable in Montgomery County</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15238626</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/755850"><b>DonLibes</b></A> : Herewith, my introduction to attention whoredom.<br><br>I just created a Frappr for readers of my blog on MCMD telecomm issues and since it's new, the map is looking positively naked.<br><br>So... add yourself to my Frappr and get a chance to win a free On Demand movie.  (A movie you'd ordinarily have to pay for, that is - and I'll give you a coupon for it to include with your next bill payment.)<br><br>Since the coupon is only good in MCMD, don't bother applying if your only goal is a free movie (although you can still add yourself no matter where you live if you really do read my blog).<br><br>I will select a winner next Wednesday evening based on the number of billing and HSI complaints received by the LFA for December.  Complete details at my blog:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.libes.com/don/blog" >www.libes.com/don/blog</A><br><br><SMALL><SMALL>Title change. ~sorto'</SMALL></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15238626</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:45:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
