<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Go back to old way of finding wireless networks! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15279207</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:01 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:02:01 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Go back to old way of finding wireless networks!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15281207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Straightforward?  XP SP2 has a much better and improved native interface for wireless cards.  With the pre SP2 way, there was so much headache that I would disable windows native control and use the card's client utility to configure it.  I still use the client utility on my personal system, but for all the other machines that I fix, I upgrade to SP2 (if not SP2 already) and let windows control the wifi.  Much easier for both me and the other person involved.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15281207</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:50:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Go back to old way of finding wireless networks!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279207</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : I still can't stand XP SP2's interface for finding wireless networks.  The old way was much more straightforward.<br><SMALL>--<br>Rove / Rumsfeld 2008!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279207</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:56:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
