<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Clarify this in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15280494</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:15:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:15:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Clarify this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15280494</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1153638"><b>jpark</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  vpoko <A HREF="/useremail/u/835408"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tlniec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1051429"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless.<br> </DIV>That's not true, look up "legal estopel". If somebody who you have a contract with makes a claim contrary to the contract (without modifying it) and then attempts to enforce the original terms of the contract, you can make an estopel defense.<br> </DIV>Sure. If you have the money to support legal action. Having a defence doesn't keep the TOS from threatening you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15280494</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:27:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clarify this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15280217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/835408"><b>vpoko</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tlniec <A HREF="/useremail/u/1051429"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless.<br> </DIV>That's not true, look up "legal estopel". If somebody who you have a contract with makes a claim contrary to the contract (without modifying it) and then attempts to enforce the original terms of the contract, you can make an estopel defense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15280217</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:48:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Clarify this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1051429"><b>tlniec</b></A> : Exactly... if this 'clarification' isn't written into the ToS, it's meaningless.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279539</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:54:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Clarify this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279357</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1095658"><b>packetscan</b></A> : I don't care what you "mean" to say, Clarify all you want. <br><br>Put it in writing that this 5 dollar clause is not applicable to virus infections.<br><br>Because of there current TOS they can go after every single user!<br><SMALL>--<br>Who do you want to pay off today?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15279357</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:21:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
