site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
Premium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ
Reviews:
·Optimum Online

reply to koitsu

Re: Translation

said by koitsu:

US$40 6/1 cable versus US$400 512/512 co-location.
Damn! If you're paying $400 for a server and 512Kb/s of usage, I've got a bridge to sell you.
--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity


koitsu
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-16
Mountain View, CA
kudos:14

said by sporkme:

Damn! If you're paying $400 for a server and 512Kb/s of usage, I've got a bridge to sell you.
Actually the bandwidth isn't that bad -- it's the 14U of rack space and power which is.
--
Making life hard for others since 1977. In memory of 2005...

Hanko

join:2001-12-28
Eatonville, WA

reply to sporkme
It isn't only those who run servers that have to pay a high price for bandwidth. If you are a "Rural" customer like me who cannot get cable or DSL and Satellite is just not cutting it for VPN use you are stuck paying high prices.

I have a T1 to my house. It allows me to work from here instead of driving into downtown Seattle every day. I gladly pay the $536/month for the service. While I feel for those who complain that they are not getting all of their bandwidth from a 6/1 cable connection at $50/month I would gladly trade my monthly bill with them for the bandwidth anytime.

It is all relative on your situation.


Monday, 28-May 01:32:38 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics