 MinvarenPremium
join:2001-07-26
Houston, TX | Approximately? So, they're stating that they're not sure how many international laws stating one's opinion in public breaks?
This lawsuit should be interesting. |
|
kpatzMY HEAD A SPLODEPremium
join:2003-06-13
Manchester, NH | They're full of hooey. I doubt they broke any international laws, they're just posing empty threats.
Unless some third-rate country has a law prohibiting blog entries that say "so-and-so sucks, boycott them", that is...
--
SMTP: Spam and Malware Transfer Protocol. Also used on rare occasion to transmit e-mail messages. |
|
 ThalerPremium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3
 ·DSL EXTREME
| said by kpatz:Unless some third-rate country has a law prohibiting blog entries that say "so-and-so sucks, boycott them", that is... Would that have any application though? I mean, say if Australia banned the word "porn" from being posted on the internet, they would have no authority outside their own borders to enfoce it. Sure, they could put in place filtering software, but everyone else would still be able to view the internet in all it's glory. |
|
|
|
