site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
57
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


powerhog
Stinkin' up the joint
Premium
join:2000-12-14
Owasso, OK

Cake & eat it too?

For years, here in OK, SBC claimed that, even though none are in direct competition, all of the small ILECs were competitors and, therefore, SBC should be allowed to offer long-distance services and have state regulations reduced. The state legislators agreed and handed SBC everything they wanted.

Now, it seems that these non-competing "competitors" are being merged back into Ma Bell with the reason that there isn't really any competition, so the mergers should be approved.

So which is it? Are these other phone companies competitors or not?

This merger doesn't really affect me at all because neither SBC nor BS services my location. But we (the consumers & voting public) need to make these companies pick a stance on their 'competition' and stick with it.

Sunday, 27-May 21:49:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics