 japPremium
join:2003-08-10
038xx | put yourself in the shoes of average users... You guys are interpreting this within the context of geeky poweruser needs. Most people would jump on this as a place to mirror the most-used portions of their filing tree from their desktop: pics, email db, pointers to sites, passwords, etc.. Google will implement pointer execution on their end: fast for the user and as yet untapped treasure trove of enduser browsing data for Google.
The big question is will google allow self-encrypted storage and, if so, for how large a data chunk. They've little incentive to allow it, but disallowal will crimp adoption rates. |
|
|
Will they "ALLOW" self encrypted storage? If they didn't, WHY would you use it? Store your passwords on google? I wish the clueless good luck with this. You wont find me using it any time soon. Suckers.
|
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by Fatal Vector:Will they "ALLOW" self encrypted storage? If they didn't, WHY would you use it? Store your passwords on google? I wish the clueless good luck with this. You wont find me using it any time soon. Suckers. Why would they not allow "SELF" encrypted storage?
I doubt very seriously they are going to say, "Hey, this file is encrypted, *BONK*, you can't upload this file".
You seem to be a bit more clueless than the rest. |
|
