 TopmounterSent By Grocery Clerks join:2001-02-20 Evergreen, CO | reply to fAcEtIOUs
Re: WSJ got it wrong on fiber inside home; but right on growth "Video" has (or had) the sex appeal to sell the expensive network upgrade to the Wall Street crowd. -- "If PCs are hard, then Macs are flaccid" -bb |
|
 Host: Road Runner PC gaming GAMES PC gaming Tech
| I dunno, I think it might be the video component that scares them most. You can sell the need for additional bandwidth. But with entrenched cable/sat competition and a slew of IP video services, on-demand, place-shifting, and other services, I'd be worried about telco TV.
The best way to sell it I guess is to bundle, but that's still a long time before Telco-TV becomes profitable. |
|
 TopmounterSent By Grocery Clerks join:2001-02-20 Evergreen, CO | Without some "sex appeal", Wall Street would have been happy to cash cow the Telcos into twisted pair oblivion.
I think you are correct though, when it comes to video services, the Telcos don't know what they don't know and it is going to be quite sometime before they have a widely deployed, competitive product that is financially viable (assuming they even have the stomach to get there).
Cable and Satellite haven't even begun to compete. -- "If PCs are hard, then Macs are flaccid" -bb |
|
 Host: Road Runner PC gaming GAMES PC gaming Tech
| I certainly wouldn't want to be trying to compete in the video space in 2010. If the offerings are good from the five-zillion companies planning to offer TV to iPod, phone, and everything else - there becomes no need for traditional "cable" service, or anything like it.
Existing cable-operators could have a hard time, much less a telco with only 45% of its footprint capable of offering IPTV.
That's without even mentioning piracy and show-trading, which I'll assume will explode even more in popularity. |
|