<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>STARFORCE copy protection - Black Hats? in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15667122</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:39:46 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:39:46 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: STARFORCE copy protection - Black Hats?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667189</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/615773"><b>hpguru</b></A> : It doesn't surprise me at all. Just as a reminder this same group is the maker of Safe&#146;n&#146;Sec.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667189</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:39:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: STARFORCE copy protection - Black Hats?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667182</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917630"><b>Cudni</b></A> : If there such thing as negative publicity this would qualify<br><br>Cudni]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667182</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:36:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>STARFORCE copy protection - Black Hats?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667122</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761551"><b>sharpy merc</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tweakguides.com/" >www.tweakguides.com/</A><br><br>Un-freaking-believable.<br><br>EDIT: adding second link tweakguides gone down (wonder if the russian mafia made them a offer)<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.galciv2.com/?ForumID=161&AID=106741" >forums.galciv2.com/?ForumID=161&AID=106741</A><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15667122</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 08:18:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
