<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Google Getting Into Lobbying Game in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15776740</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:43:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:43:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Google Getting Into Lobbying Game</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15777925</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1315394"><b>odreian615</b></A> : too little too late telcos and cablecos been lobbying for years I guess Google was thinking the coolness factor was going to win over some 50+y/o congressmen and and only give out 200k in lobby money compared with 152 million ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15777925</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Google Getting Into Lobbying Game</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15776740</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/141383"><b>Karl Bode</b></A> : Related, a New York Times article this morning about how Google is done staying away from the lobbying game.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/28/politics/28google.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5090&en=8dd8f26f5553f9db&ex=1301202000&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss" >www.nytimes.com/2006/03/28/polit&middot;&middot;&middot;&emc=rss</A><br><br>Possibly more motivated by fears of anti-China regulation than net-neutrality, however.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15776740</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:27:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
