<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15787138</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:26:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:26:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Franchise - hidden (real estate) tax; Astroturf</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15790903</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265006"><b>nekote</b></A> : IMHO, one of the primary purposes these days of the "Franchise" agreements is for a municipality to obtain a hidden stream of benefits, via the cable bill, rather than the up front (real estate) tax bill.<br><br>Hey, you want a local studio and $100,000/yr to staff and operate it?<br>Well, just tack that on to the consumer's cable bill.<br>That way, it isn't really a municipal expense, right?<br><br>Astroturf - cool euphemism for artificial "grass roots".<br><br>Sadly, "Astroturf" advocacy groups are a common and very long standing method of obfuscating / advocating on issues.<br><SMALL>--<br>Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all other forms of government. - <I>Winston Churchill</I></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15790903</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:10:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15790459</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1069980"><b>LilYoda</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  toadlife <A HREF="/useremail/u/1001074"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pcscdma <A HREF="/useremail/u/932022"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I think it's hilarious that you have a mywireless.org site in your signature. LOL<br> </DIV>Let me guess - an astro-turfing site?    :D<br> </DIV>Read the article...  Mywireless.org is at the bottom of the list.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15790459</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:52:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15788529</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1001074"><b>toadlife</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pcscdma <A HREF="/useremail/u/932022"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I think it's hilarious that you have a mywireless.org site in your signature. LOL<br> </DIV>Let me guess - an astro-turfing site?    :D<br><SMALL>--<br>Have problems running your Windows box as a limited user?<BR>Try this...&raquo;<A HREF="http://winsudo.toadlife.net" >winsudo.toadlife.net</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15788529</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:30:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787856</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/932022"><b>pcscdma</b></A> : I think it's hilarious that you have a mywireless.org site in your signature. LOL]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787856</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:51:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787553</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/770196"><b>major marco</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Admj <A HREF="/useremail/u/289063"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br> :mad: Maybe the people making the laws should be doing research to make a better choice before they actually vote on making laws and protect the ones that put them in office...<br> </DIV>The same professional grifters on the take couldn't even be bothered to read the most draconian, civil rights voiding legislation in the country's entire history before they signed it and you want them to research piddling cable issues before they make it a law?   OMFG.  Now that's some funny ass shit.  Get real.  Informed opinions aren't how it works in this country, particularly as it relates to consumers.  The name of the game is <U>money</U>.  We have the best government that money can buy.<br><SMALL>--<br>Stop funding the Spanish-American War through the cell phone federal tax:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mywireless.org/issuesfetirs/" >www.mywireless.org/issuesfetirs/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787553</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:06:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><b>DaveNJ</b></A> : Thats stupid , why would want to give away the only clout the consumer have against corporations such as comcast, and verizon ?<br><SMALL>--<br>Vonage--No annual contract really means 13 month commitment.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787350</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787138</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/289063"><b>Admj</b></A> :  :mad: Maybe the people making the laws should be doing research to make a better choice before they actually vote on making laws and protect the ones that put them in office...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15787138</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:02:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Local cable franchise agreements SHOULD be eliminated.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/739779"><b>gheezer</b></A> : And the Cable company told, in no uncertain terms, they MUST not absorb the franchise payments as revenue, it MUST be returned to the subscriber in the form of lower monthly bills.<br><br>Local Franchise agreements are an anachronism, and contribute to the "Monopoly" the cable company maintains locally.<br><SMALL>--<br>Join the NAVY, see the world....It's mostly water!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15786849</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:21:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
