| re:3meg wireless per user ? their dreaming. This isn't theoretical. This is what the users in the network, which has been around for a few years, get. |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3
1 edit | TheTonyMN or TW MPLS, who ever you are, can you pick a handle already?
So they missed the direction on Chaska.. big deal.
Why is everyone so negative about this article? This may not be "the best thing" for Chaska (which some would disagree) being so close to the major metro area, but this technology has to start somewhere. (For the record, anyone that knows the twic cities would stop thinking and using the lable Minneapolis since MPLS is just one of many cities in a 13 county metro that makes up this HUGE population area)
What is the ultimate complaint in this country? Choice? access? Black holes? This stuff has to start SOMEWHERE... right?
I find it completely rediculous that people are even bitching about this article to begin with in this thread.
For those of you in the boondocks, just remember smaller towns like Chaska and others that are deploying these services when you finally get SOMETHING in your areas..
What this story has proven so far is that people will bitch about anything. |
|
ricep5Premium
join:2000-08-07
Jacksonville, FL | reply to fiberguy
Re: re:3meg wireless per user ? their dreaming. >sarcasm You mean MPLS stands for Minneapolis? I always got it confused with Multi Protocol Label Switching. For the Vikings it means Mulitple Players Leaving Simultaneously.
Just joking, I have no knock on the Twin Cities. It's a great town. |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | Oh,.. feel free to bash the Vikings all you want! We do.. Minnesotans, I've learned, are fare weathered fans..  But you are right, the Twin Cities is a great place! |
|
