<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Same as Geneva....but different in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15973102</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:49:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 13:49:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Same as Geneva....but different</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15973102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/182150"><b>ricep5</b></A> : Basically holding Lafayette to the same rules that Geneva IL is trying to uphold with AT&T.<br><br>The law BS quotes begins here..<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=285523" >www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=285523</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15973102</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:06:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
