<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: instead of that in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r15975729</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:02:35 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:02:35 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: instead of that</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15975729</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : Well they would but they have to waste money to hold off unfair competition.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15975729</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:14:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>instead of that</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15973254</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897049"><b>spepper</b></A> : instead of doing that, why doesn't Bell South spend its resources (intead of putting lawyers to work, God knows we have enough of them already), to actually building the infrastructure to compete with that? Remote DSLAM's. etc. to extend the range of their service areas??? INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW--]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15973254</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:36:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
