site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
202
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

RichNice

join:2003-01-09
Columbia, MD

Man...Qwest gets even worse news....

When I worked there, that contract was one of it's most prized possesions....I know somone's gonna lost their head over this one.

Jonbo298

join:2004-01-12
Council Bluffs, IA

Yeah, I can't imagine their shock when they were informed they've been taken out of this



heatison

@qwest.net

reply to RichNice
There is NOTHING in the AP article that says that Qwest was "fired." What it DOES say is that the current Internet2 is run by Qwest, and that the new fiber links will also be run by a private contractor, as yet unnamed. Presuming the project was put out for bid, any of a number of companies could be the winner, INCLUDING Qwest.


RichNice

join:2003-01-09
Columbia, MD

Let's use common sense here....if the new contractor was still Qwest, there would be no problem in naming it as the contractor for the new network. So why won't they name it? Common sense says that Qwest lost the contract. Once it's named, we'll see who was wrong.


Monday, 28-May 00:56:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics