http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16031483 en Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:55:56 EDT Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:55:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16031483 RichNice : Let's use common sense here....if the new contractor was still Qwest, there would be no problem in naming it as the contractor for the new network. So why won't they name it? Common sense says that Qwest lost the contract. Once it's named, we'll see who was wrong.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16031483 Thu, 04 May 2006 17:09:43 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16007571 anon : There is NOTHING in the AP article that says that Qwest was "fired." What it DOES say is that the current Internet2 is run by Qwest, and that the new fiber links will also be run by a private contractor, as yet unnamed. Presuming the project was put out for bid, any of a number of companies could be the winner, INCLUDING Qwest.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16007571 Mon, 01 May 2006 12:04:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15988540 Jonbo298 : Yeah, I can't imagine their shock when they were informed they've been taken out of this :D]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15988540 Fri, 28 Apr 2006 09:15:14 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15988423 RichNice : When I worked there, that contract was one of it's most prized possesions....I know somone's gonna lost their head over this one.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15988423 Fri, 28 Apr 2006 08:53:06 EDT