<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing in Spam, Scam and Phishbusters</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16055213</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:45:26 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:45:26 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16113383</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/581232"><b>removed</b></A> : MGD, how dare you log on to a phisher's account, steal his data, and notify all his victims? You, sir, are a criminal and deserve to be punished to the fullest extent of the law!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16113383</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 03:43:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16097448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1216098"><b>s0tet</b></A> : Thanks, MGD. Great information to pass because of your time and effort.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16097448</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 21:55:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16097008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1003137"><b>garys_2k</b></A> : Excellent work, MGD. Now if only Ebay and Paypal would take the precautions others have suggested, such as watching for "wrong country" logins and such.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16097008</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 20:37:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16092031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : First, Thank you all for the encouraging posts, much appreciated. Thanks also to  UncleScooter <A HREF="/useremail/u/616961"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> and  nwrickert <A HREF="/useremail/u/1070900"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> for submitting to phishtrack, if it were not for that, I would not have discovered this process. <br><br><U><B>Update:</B></U><br><br>The two Paypal phishing sites that were found to be pulling the active account data from Paypal were submitted to phishtrack on 05/04<br><br>The first one was Phish 1911 &raquo;<A HREF="/phishtrack?pid=1909&urls=1">/phishtrack?pi&middot;&middot;&middot;9&urls=1</A> and the second one was Phish 1909 &raquo;<A HREF="/phishtrack?pid=1909&urls=1">/phishtrack?pi&middot;&middot;&middot;9&urls=1</A> Phish 1909, which was running on a kidc.net IP in Korea, that appears to have been finally taken down on Wednesday: ht*tp://211.233.66.55/paypal.com/index.php?bWFpIHByb3N0=aWxvciBtYWkgc3VnZXRpIHB1bGEgZnV0dXZhIG1hbWVsZSBpbiBndXRhIGRlIGxhYmFya SBjZSBzdW50ZXRpIHNpIGRvYm90b2NpIHBpc2VtYX<br><br>Phish 1911 was spammed to a referral link that was placed on a hijacked ht*tp://www.executivedevelopmentreport.com/index2.htm in the US, and it looks like Denairsoft and/or the host Nuvox.net finally pulled the referral on Thursday. By the way, that was a dismal response since they were both larted several times since 05/04. The actual phish site was hosted in China on an IP registered to China Telecom. The Phish has not been removed yet, however, it is now dormant. Records indicate that the phish site was spammed several times using different referrals on hijacked US hosts. <br><br><BLOCKQUOTE><HR><br>05/06/06 12:18:11 Browsing ht*tp://www.executivedevelopmentreport.com/index2.htm<br>Fetching ht*tp://www.executivedevelopmentreport.com/index2.htm ...<br>GET /index2.htm HTTP/1.1<br>Host: www.executivedevelopmentreport.com<br>Connection: close<br>User-Agent: Sam Spade 1.14<br><br>HTTP/1.1 200 OK<br>Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0<br>X-Powered-By: ASP.NET<br>Connection: close<br>Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 16:20:12 GMT<br>Content-Type: text/html<br>Accept-Ranges: bytes<br>Last-Modified: Thu, 04 May 2006 18:34:20 GMT<br>ETag: "ec3e845ba96fc61:a8e"<br>Content-Length: 109<br>>META      HTTP-EQUIV="Refresh"CONTENT="0; URL=http://219.1XX.XXX.XXX/XXXXXX/webscr.php?cmd=Login"<HR><br><br>During the anyalysis and probing of Phish 1911 the victim User ID and passwords were discovered. The first notable trigger was the absence of expletive submits, where users who<br>know it is a phish will leave messages for the phisher in the User id password fields. While that issue itself is not totally unusual, many phishes especially Ebay will validate the user ID and discard non valid ones. It was the lack of those entries combined with the significant accrual rate during the monitoring that made it suspicious, and prompted further analysis.<br><br>A random check of several of the initial entries revealed that they were all valid accounts. <br>Based on that qualifaction the existing list of ~150 accounts was sent to a security contact at Ebay/PayPal on Thursday evening 05/04. The file was reviewed during the early hours on Friday and another batch of ~150 accounts was found and forwarded to the security contact.<br><br>It was then becoming obvious that something different was in play here. The rate and validity of the data surpassed anything I had previously ran across. Later on Friday I began examining the scripting process looking for clues that might explain the difference. It was then thar the discovery was made that the Phish was pulling the account data and displaying it to the victim. Not only was it the first time that I had seen this, but I considered it significant in that it gave a decidedly legitimate appearance to the phish.<br><br>In conversations with previous phishing victims many had said that they backed out of a phish when presented with the second page after logining in. They usually became suspicious when their SSN, or their card PIN # was requested. Obviously there is no valid reason for a SSN, and a PIN # is not needed for either debit or Credit card billing transactions. In anticipation of this, Phishers usually have two scripts running. The first one captures the User ID/ login upon entry/validation and sends it to the drop box. The second script sends all the card data plus SSN etc. along with a copy of the login data to the drop box after the second page is completed. This way the phisher still gets the login info even if the second page arouses suspicion and causes the victim to back out. The retrieval and display of the account data on that second page is considered a significant motivator for those that may have varying degrees of skepticism at page two. In fact, in several previous cases of victim notification I will get immediate replies along the lines of <I>"Damm , I knew there was something wrong about that, it has been on my mind ever since I completed it."</I> or <I>" Thanks, I only need to change my log on password as I never entered anything on the second page, as it did not seem right"</I>.<br><br>Because of this "new to me" discovery I checked other Paypal phishes submitted to phishtrack to see if that process was used elsewhere. After reviewing several open Paypal phishes I found that Phish 1909 was using the same process. I then started to put together a documented post on this procedure to get the word out. I am grateful to those of you who helped get this front page attention so the warning could get grater publicity. The range of victims was used to demonstarte the pivotal factor of this account dispaly, which I believed was causing a significant increase in the response rate.<br><br>By Friday evening an additional 250 accounts were turned over, and by Monday the Ebay/Paypal contact confirmed that all 1,100 acconts were processed as compromised.<br><br> MeanPeepsSuk <A HREF="/useremail/u/1112464"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> gave excellent scenarios as to the circumstances that yield a sucessfull phish, I also thank  K Patterson <A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>,  izy <A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> and others for their contributions. <br><br>Kudos to  justin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> for creating phishtrack, numerous victims have been spared from the nightmare of having their financial accounts ravaged as a result of it. In additon, thanks to  amysheehan <A HREF="/useremail/u/122916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> and others who volunteer their time tracking down the hosting sites and having them shut down. Getting phish sites closed promptly is a key component in denying the criminals their financial benefit. The first 24 to 72 hours is the timeframe during which most of the data is collected. Obtaining the scripts helps identify the email drop box accounts, and also assists in identifying the origin of the phishers. In this case the benefit of over 1,100 accounts were removed from a phishers booty, hopefully generating much discord in the criminal aftermarket. <br><br>You can add this one to the numerous other data retrievals as a result of submissions to phishtrack. Most recently was the victim banking account details obtained from several Chase Bank phishes, some of which were in the hands of Chase security within an hour of the data routing to the criminals. <br><br>Unfortunately in this case individual notification to the victims was impossible due to the volume and timeframe required. Victim notification is a valuable part of the process of dealing with phishing. Besides the abilty to cancel or change the passwords on the affected accounts and denying access to the phisher, there is also an educational value. Many times when a card/account is compromised it takes some time for the discovery to be made. The victims may not realize that the account hijacking was the result of their participation in a phish. If so, then they are even more at risk to being phished again, as their name, address, and bank are now known to the criminals. They can be targeted in the future with more convincing and personalized phishes that contain portions of their personal information. With notification, the victim can not only know that they were phished, but see exactly how it operated, such as obfuscated links etc. Once explained, they will not likely fall victim again. Furthermore, many victims have told me that they alert and educate their family and friends, and spread the word. This wholesale reduction from the potential phish pool can very effective, as it certainly is not true that everyone can only be phished once.<br><br>Just a small reminder of how phishtrack and the volunteers of the BBR community have an impact on peoples lives, who otherwise are left to fend for themselves in the shark infested waters of cyberspace:<br><br><BLOCKQUOTE><br><I>----- Original Message ----- <br>From: "XXXX XXXXXXX" <br>To: XXXXXXXX<br>Sent: Tuesday, XXXX XX, 2006 2:36 PM<br>Subject: Fake Ebay<br><br> Dear member and Volunteer of Broadband Reports scambusting forum, I am so <br> grateful for your immediate help and correction on this fake e-mail from <br> Ebay. I didn't know that it was a fake and didn't even think twice about <br> it, I just replied on the matter, my husband had surgery a few days ago and <br> I decided to update for him or for us for that matter. I called our Bank <br> right away and all was done to Block and cancel account, nothing as of yet <br> had gone through on our account. I just thank you so much, I'm afraid that <br> I did get one from Capital One on line in the end of 05 saying and asking <br> questions regarding this account and I didn't have one, they said that <br> several people were using my ATM on this card and to please update . I <br> tried, the phone numbers didn't work or couldn't forward the e-mail to <br> check on this. I haven't as of yet seen anything or check our credit <br> report, but we did encounter a fraud charge and that was taken care.<br> On our e-mail there is a part I can't delete there is a hidden e-mail, you <br> can see it when you delete the last e-mail, its right below, this has never <br> been there before I don't know to delete it or clear it.<br> can you give us some help on this?<br> again, thank you for watching out, we are sooo grateful........<br> X. XXXXX <br><br>From: XXXXXXXX@aol.com <br>To: XXXXXXXXXX <br>Sent: Sunday, XXXXXX, 2006 1:41 PM<br>Subject: Fwd: XXXX E XXXXX IMPORTANT!! Please Read!! <br><br>Thank you for the ALERT AND UPDATE.<br><br>Please know that I have taken the necessary action to safeguard all of my personal information with the changes I've made.<br><br>GOD Bless you<br><br>XXXXXX</I><br></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16092031</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 21:44:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another one</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16076537</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/517760"><b>catseyenu</b></A> : Contact made with (954) 430-7156, information/links sent.<br>Edit: And she's down. Thank you Tous Corp.!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16076537</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 15:15:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Another one</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16075942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><b>izy</b></A> : Looks like a business DSL account. Likely a hijacked web server. It hosts the site &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.touscorp.com" >www.touscorp.com</A><br><br>Windows 2000 - IIS 5.0 - Give them a ring!!<br><br>Registrant:<br>Tous SoftWare Corp<br><br>17447 S.W. 20 CT<br>MIRAMAR, Florida 33029<br>United States<br><br>Registered through: GoDaddy.com (&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.godaddy.com" >www.godaddy.com</A>)<br>Domain Name: TOUSCORP.COM<br>Created on: 28-Oct-97<br>Expires on: 26-Oct-06<br>Last Updated on: 05-Dec-05<br><br>Administrative Contact:<br>Hidalgo, Felipe fhidalgo@touscorp.com<br>Tous SoftWare Corp<br>17447 SW 20 CT<br>MIRAMAR, Florida 33029<br>United States<br>(954) 430-7156 Fax -- (954) 430-7156<br><br>Technical Contact:<br>Hidalgo, Felipe fhidalgo@touscorp.com<br>Tous SoftWare Corp<br>17447 SW 20 CT<br>MIRAMAR, Florida 33029<br>United States<br>(954) 430-7156 Fax -- (954) 430-7156<br><br>Domain servers in listed order:<br>NS.TZO.COM<br>NS2.TZO.COM]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16075942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:46:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Another one</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16075876</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1017103"><b>oroper</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://adsl-068-209-100-060.sip.mia.bellsouth.net:82/web/index.php" >adsl-068-209-100-060.sip.mia.bel&middot;&middot;&middot;ndex.php</A><br><SMALL>--<br>I'm a Chapelle Fan-I'm Rich Beehatch!!</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16075876?c=1007019&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="162924 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1007019.thumb600~279c681523bf9624e5ce94845a00ce3b/fakepaypal.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16075876</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:35:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16073439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/905210"><b>user4275</b></A> :  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> rulez! And yes, these Paypal phishes are very scary. Let's all try to chip in and fry them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16073439</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 02:27:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16073032</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/254898"><b>pcdebb</b></A> :  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> I applaud and appreciate your efforts wholeheartedly.  I've said this before and i'm saying it again.  I know if my name were on any of those lists, I'd be satisfied to know you were fighting for me.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://pcdebb.blogspot.com/">babbling</A> | <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/weather">How's the weather?</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16073032</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 00:34:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/527822"><b>Mordy</b></A> : OK, your opinions have been heard loud and clear.  For whatever reason, you disbelieve the facts as stated as to the breadth of this crime, and you clearly don't like the efforts being taken to bring the criminals down and assist the victims.<br><br>Fine.<br><br>Now that the controversial opinions are on the table, have been discussed to death, and everyone has had a say, let's now get back to the original discussion of the crime.  If <I>anyone</I> feels the further need to disrupt this thread by posting hyperbole, unsubstantiated conjecture, or just wanting to get more attention by being unpopular, I will start killing posts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069329</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 15:03:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069307</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1070900"><b>nwrickert</b></A> : <div class="bquote">Again you entirely miss the point. The people that can actually do something about it, (READ: REAL LAW ENFORCEMENT) are continually crippled by this white hat BS good guy hacker crap.</DIV>You entirely miss the point.  The people that can actually do something about it (READ: REAL LAW ENFORCEMENT) have been sitting on their behinds for years and doing nothing, while criminals have been busy building huge botnets.<br><br>I don't know exactly what  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> has been doing, but it sure better than the nothing that was otherwise being done.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069307</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:59:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069003</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I've gotten that email three times.  The first time, suspecting it might be phishing, I went directly to PayPal (not by clicking on the link in the email), logged in, and sent a query, with the salient part of the email included in the text of my message.  I asked PayPal if this was a legitimate request from them.  To date, PayPal has not replied.  To be on the safe side, I went back into PayPal--after restarting my computer--and verified all of my account data.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16069003</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:14:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/795407"><b>SnowyOne</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> That unless he's a sworn police officer or working under the direction of a law enforcement agency, he's done more dammage than good.<br></DIV>Without exception every victim behind the data that  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> culled from the phish would disagree with your assessment. Suggesting that prosecution of the bad guys is the final solution shows a total ignorance of the dynamics & complexity of a phish.<br>Of all the different elements that come into play regarding a successful phish, lack of prosecution isn't one of the biggies because it's just not realistic enough for this real world problem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068977</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:09:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><b>K Patterson</b></A> : We know who MGD is.<br><br>You, sir/madam, are a troll.<br><br>MGD has made many positive contributions.  It would be helpful if you did the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068974</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:09:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><b>izy</b></A> : You are correct, the data can be retrieved from anywhere. Hence the inability for law enforcement in the US to do exactly what MGD has done. Their hands are tied in most, if not all cases like this. The only thing that can be done is to put pressure on the host to take down the site. Meanwhile, hundreds more become victims.<br><br>Do you really think that even after all is said and done (or even during the phish) OUR government or PayPayl or {insert phished company name here} alerts victims that their identities have been compromised via a phishing website? If you do, you are sorely mistaken. It's every victim for themselves, heck they probably won't even know anything was wrong until they see a charge for a Volkswagen in Croatia on their Citibank card.<br><br>I'm done with your perfect world assumptions, if you feel the need to chime in with your "they should know better" attitude, feel free. I applaud  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s efforts and  justin <A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s work on the invaluable phishtrack tool. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068905</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:56:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068701</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : At least three admited felonies does not make for a good Samaritan.<br>Alerting the bad guys by stealing their data and exposing the flaws of their security and phishing, not a good Samaritan.<br>Just because a server is located half a world away, doesn't mean the data isn't retrieved from say Fort Lauderdale, FL...as so aptly "proven" by MGD in his supposed hack of their system.<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  izy <A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Who are you? I have no clue...<br><br>Do you know who MGD is? Neither do I...<br><br>Is he being a good Samaritan? Yes indeed...<br><br>Is he breaking this so called "chain of evidence"? Probably, but when the server is in some 3rd world country where their own government is more corrupt than the phishing crooks, the least he can do is notify the victims (which has been done in the past with sucess) that their identity may be compromised. More power to him!<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068701</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:26:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068658</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : Again you entirely miss the point. The people that can actually do something about it, (READ: REAL LAW ENFORCEMENT) are continually crippled by this white hat BS good guy hacker crap.<br><br>Again read his post, the number 1,100 is a totally BS number...taken from an estimation of 1 good out of 100.<br><br>You can slice it any way you want to make yourself feel good, but all this has proven is <br>That phistrack helps people hack into systems by listing the most popular phishing systems. <br>That even if you actually believe that MGD did hack the system, he committed several felonies and ruined a chain of evidence.<br>That the phisher was clued into the flaws in their system and will be "better" next time thanks to MGD, that PayPal will have to worry about the next one...that we know that there are at least two sets of hacked data out there...the info taken in the original phish and the stuff that supposedly on MGD's system...and gloy be, no arrests, the folks are in the wind, and they are smarter for the efforts of MGD.<br>That people will do anything to justify "white hat game".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068658</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:21:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068654</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><b>izy</b></A> : Who are you? I have no clue...<br><br>Do you know who MGD is? Neither do I...<br><br>Is he being a good smaraitan? Yes indeed...<br><br>Is he breaking this so called "chain of evidence"? Probably, but when the server is in some 3rd world country where their own government is more corrupt than the phishing crooks, the least he can do is notify the victims (which has been done in the past with sucess) that their identity may be compromised. More power to him!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068654</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:20:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068588</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : Ohhh I understand completely, he used fishtrack to find a popular system then hacked into it.<br>Taking all the data and the logs.<br>The openly admitted to it here.<br><br>What you seem not to understand is that in doing so he damaged a chain of evidence. That he committed a felony or three to do so.<br><br>Yes there were victims in this case but my concern is also with actually doing something about the people doing this, not just the victims for once incident.<br><br>So MGD did a great job, he alerted the bad guys to the problems with their "system", stole data of any number of people, and now the argument could be made that any of the data used was used by MGD or anyone else that might have rode in on his hack.<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  izy <A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>If you have a claim from PayPal that all those accounts were compromised, I'd like to see it. </DIV>You sir obviously need to view some of  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s past posts. These phishing websites log to a file stored on the server. In which, MGD has compromised the suspect webspace the phish site is hosted on gaining access to these log files.<br><br>Being skeptical is good, we all should be more skeptical. But you really don't seem to understand how these phish sites operate. Maybe read through some of MGD's past threads and you will understand more clearly the situation at hand.<br><br>btw, every single <STRIKE>name</STRIKE> victim on that file HAS BEEN compromised. If you don't agree, I suggest you lookup the definition of compromised.<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068588</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:12:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : I don't normally do spelling flames but it is very hard to take your holier than thou accusations seriously here.<br><br>The victims would be grateful, paypal would be grateful, and the phisher very unhappy. The only other person who appears to be unhappy is you, because you shot first without reading the details and are now trying (and failing) to find something else to criticise.<br><br>If you run the server that was compromised in order to damage the phish, feel free to start the lawsuit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068558</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:08:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : I understand this:<br><br>Phistrack was used to find a very popular phishing "system" and a poster named MGD used that information to then supposedly hack into that system to download data.<br><br>That hacking into a system (for good intentions or bad) is a FELONY in the US. Which seems to be what MGD has admitted to.<br><br>That in doing so he has ruined any chance maintaining a true  evidence chain. That unless he's a sworn police officer or working under the direction of a law enforcement agency, he's done more dammage than good.<br><br>Now let us talk about phistrack<br>If MGD can do it for "good", reading phistrack and trying to exploit the top listed "phishes" so can any other person for "bad". So phistrack is an excellent tool for the lasy hacker who wants to exploit other peoples phishing schemes. Why bother doing all the work of setting up you own phish when DSLreports has a top 100(0) list of phishes you can hack and then steal data from. Nice.<br><br>Good intentions all around but bad implimentation.<br><br>Lastly, his number is an "estimation" based on a 1 in 100 good for incident. As well it seems much of his information is estimate and conjecture...so he either addmited to a couple felonies, and actually got the data or is just guessing and making up numbers. You tell me, I would love to know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068532</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 13:05:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068417</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/205255"><b>izy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>If you have a claim from PayPal that all those accounts were compromised, I'd like to see it. </DIV>You sir obviously need to view some of  MGD <A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>'s past posts. These phishing websites log to a file stored on the server. In which, MGD has compromised the suspect webspace the phish site is hosted on gaining access to these log files.<br><br>Being skeptical is good, we all should be more skeptical. But you really don't seem to understand how these phish sites operate. Maybe read through some of MGD's past threads and you will understand more clearly the situation at hand.<br><br>btw, every single <STRIKE>name</STRIKE> victim on that file HAS BEEN compromised. If you don't agree, I suggest you lookup the definition of compromised.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068417</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:51:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>As state before, the use of Phistrack to difinitively prove anything is suspect. If you have a claim from PayPal that all those accounts were compromised, I'd like to see it.<br> </DIV>You mis understand, it isn't from phishtrack, it is from MGD busting into the server that was collecting the compromised records and downloading them in their entirety. Phishtrack may have alerted him to the new phish, and had the details, but the rest was good old fashioned detective work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068143</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:09:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068098</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : Double]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068098</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:02:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068095</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : As state before, the use of Phistrack to difinitively prove anything is suspect. If you have a claim from PayPal that all those accounts were compromised, I'd like to see it.<br><br>Just because somone "alerts" to a potential scam, doesn't mean they were taken in by it.<br><br>I alert when I see something I know is suspect, so in my instance any of my alerts are not to be counted as "he was taken" and I would argue that most of the people that know about phistrack are not your "normal" user and are more adept to not being "had". So the reports are even less suspect of being actually hacked.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16068095</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 12:01:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16066769</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I have no sympathy. Ignorance is never an excuse; it's just the cognitive human version of evolution in action. Getting "sucked in" to this site is just laziness, the refusal to follow the simple rule (if you MUST go & check PayPal or etc.) of not following the link, of just typing in the URL of the site directly. This doesn't require a masters' degree or some kind of esoteric knowledge.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16066769</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 06:59:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16065214</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/166306"><b>Jan Janowski</b></A> : Thanks for the great post!!!<br><br>I have received those exact emails... Wife almost fell for a bank version of same thing, too... She's now educated...<br><br>I've been always forwarding the Paypal emails to spoof@paypal.com<br>That's about all I can do to counteract it...<br><br>HOWEVER... Anybody remember the FREE CAD SOFTWARE from last year?   THE EMAIL ADDRESS I GAVE AT THAT TIME (not my 'regular' email address) is the email address it comes to... (My Paypal account uses a different email address)..<br><br>Jan<br><SMALL>--<br>Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16065214</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:08:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16065167</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/705861"><b>Jafo232</b></A> : You know what would be nice?  A way to tell your mail program that if mail X says it comes from paypal.com, mybank.com, etc., to disable all hyperlinks in email X.  Better yet?  A server side solution to do this.<br><br>Paypal and other sites with sensitive information should have a policy to never insert a hyperlink into email.  A list of these sites with this policy should be included in a mail servers configuration (i.e. load in sendmail.cf). Any email saying they are from those domains will then be "de-linked" before the mail client retrieves it.<br><br>I think it would stop a lot of users from pathetically clicking these links.  Obviously education will never work. <br><SMALL>--<br>Write Your News, Find Your News At <A HREF="http://www.pingpost.com">PingPost.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16065167</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 22:00:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1181705"><b>ddhort</b></A> : That was the immediate clue for me also, receiving a "paypal" email at a email address NOT associated with my account.  Lordy, those emails look authentic.  Vigilence is the cost of freedom I suppose.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064875</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 21:17:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064246</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/268808"><b>Oregonian</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by Vasic :</SMALL><BR><BR>Of course, in Europe, this cannot happen. The banks over there give you a physical token (and some even give you a token/magnetic card reader), so that only a person with the correct number generated by the token can log in. But this would be just too inconvenient for the US consumers, wouldn't it...?<br> </DIV>I seem to remember reading something about US banks (and others) being required by Congress to start using a second form of verification such as a token. Was I just dreaming?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064246</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:44:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064161</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875646"><b>happyland</b></A> : Paypal does have a verification system.<br>They will flag suspicious attempts to login (via a hijacked server or drastically different IP,browser,etc.) and will display some verification info for you to confirm (i.e. last 4 digis of cc and you have to enter in the full number yourself)<br>However, the phisher could just display this page to the victim, and then just forward the data to paypal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16064161</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 19:32:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16063882</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Many posters here commented (judgementally) that one should easilly recognise these messages by the URLs of the links, and other things. After having seen about 2000 phishing messages, I can say that they are getting craftier with each new one. It is very common now to see a link pointing to an URL like this:<br><br>www.paypal.com.cgi-bin.auth.490990...some seemingly arbitrary string...poorhijackedserver.com/collect.php<br><br>If you closely examine the string, you'll find out that all that staff between the 'www' and the 'poorhijackedserver.com' addresss is secondary-level domain. The phisher hacked 'poorhijackedserver.com', modified its DNS tables, added his collect.php script and spammed the world with his lure. If you look at the URL, it looks as if it comes from PayPal (begins with www.paypal.com); you don't stop to realise that there should be a '/' (forward slash) after paypal.com if that's the server address. All that 'cgi-bin.auth' stuff is made to look legitimate.<br><br>The only consistently reliable clue is the poor English in the message (which, unfortunately, a lot of victims don't notice) and almost a requirement for phishing messages, '<B><I>If you could please take 5-10 minutes out of your online experience</I></B>'. Out of more than 2000 phishing messages, I would say 1980 had this sentence in the first paragraph. I guess most phishers don't really speak English that well, so they recycle the message.<br><br>To wrap it up, it is impossible to fight this. As long as there are inexperienced web users, there will be (successful) phishing in the US. Of course, in Europe, this cannot happen. The banks over there give you a physical token (and some even give you a token/magnetic card reader), so that only a person with the correct number generated by the token can log in. But this would be just too inconvenient for the US consumers, wouldn't it...?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16063882</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:47:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16062855</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><b>K Patterson</b></A> : It may be useful to repeat what MGD found while investigating an earlier scam.  Almost all of the people who fell for it had just been on line to the bank or had just registered and were preconditioned to accept the query as legitimate.  If you think about a phisher sending out a million emails for citibank as an example, he is going to hit several tens of thousands of folks who are Citibank customers.  Let's say that the average user uses the Citibank site once a month, and that the phisher hit 40,000 citibank customers.  That would mean that he hit 1333 people with a day of using the site, and 222 within four hours.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16062855</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 16:06:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16062656</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/766947"><b>CTF</b></A> : I have received an email before saying: "Dear firstname Lastname: and it was correct.<br>It was one of those Paypal:" You have successfully sent $268.00" to Joe Blow Jewelery...<br><br>Of course, I had not made such payment.<br>There was a link in the email to log on to your account.<br><br>I almost clicked and then just typed the paypal address in a new browser window. <br>My account was fine and nothing had been paid that I had not authorized...<br><br>While I consider myself cautious, I could certainly understand that some people fall for it.<br>It was a pretty well done scam...<br><br>Arno]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16062656</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 15:42:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061741</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/203572"><b>timcuth</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  nshulga <A HREF="/useremail/u/641112"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I got one of these. Besides the obvious "don't click on emailed links", the English didn't seem right at all. In a sense, this is kinda funny, as I'm not a native English speaker (not even a very good English speaker).<br><br>So... a question for native English speakers. Do you see anything weird in the way these emails are phrased? <br> </DIV>Yes, the first one said something like "to reduce the instance of fraud". I think a more professional way of saying it would be, "...the incidence of fraud".<br><br>Tim<br><SMALL>--<br><I>The shortest sentence is, "I am". The longest is, "I do".</I></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061741</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 13:43:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061344</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MxxCon <A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Quick question where did the number of actually exploited customers come from? Who said it was actually 1,100?</DIV>i'm also curious how you know that so many people got hooked<br> </DIV> K Patterson <A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> is correct, the submissions to phishtrack are routinely analysed. If available, the scripts, logs, upload packages and any victim data are<br>extracted. This enables the phisher email drop boxes to be identified, as well as the IP addresses used by the scammer. If the victim data contains contact info, then they are notified also. If they fail to acknowledge quickly, then the data is turned over to the relevant institutions. The sheer volume in this case made sending individual notices to all of the victims impossible.<br><br>In one of the PayPal phishes the criminal was first capturing the validated log in User Id and Password separately. If the victim decided to back out at the next screen then the criminal already had those credentials.<br><br>It was that log in data that was extracted from the phish. I assume that the majority<br>would have confirmed their credit card since the last four digits and the expiration<br>date was already displayed. The card data was not found and was most likely emailed<br>to a drop box along with the log in info when they clicked on the update button.<br><br>The data was sent directly to Ebay/PayPal security to be processed as it accrued. Though<br>this Phish was spammed multiple times, it is probable that the unusually high response rate<br>was a result of this new technique, which made it appear far more legitimate than the usual phish. The typical response rate for a phish depending on the category is around 100 valid entries for a good one.<br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061344</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:51:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1112464"><b>MeanPeepsSuk</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  kw524 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1230678"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I'm just a uneducated machinist in upstate N.Y. and I knew better than to fall for that one. Maybe some Lawyers, Engineers, Academic Professionals, Web Consultants, Business owners and Headhunters go seek some common sense courses<br> </DIV>It seems like common sense.. because you know what to look for,  but it's not really common sense, is it? I mean all the clues to soothe the "average" user are there.  That's why people get fooled.  You'd have to know to look for the off URL... and know you should first (most things are easy when you know what to do, right?).<br><br>I do IT for wide range of high professionals, and (for the most part), they are not stupid.. they just don't have time to keep up with all this.  And, personally, I'd rather my doctors, lawyers, etc, spending their waking moments keeping up with their field ... rather than spending time with all this.  <br><br>Besides, most of them don't actually do their administrivia, they have low paid staff doing it for them (yes, reading all their email, doing online banking, etc.).  <br><br>Just food for thought...<br><br>Good job, MGD.. Keep on rockin'<br> <br><SMALL>--<br><I>"There are no victories against stupidity; only battles."</I><br><br> <br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061334</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:51:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL Phishes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061193</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/475168"><b>pleekmo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Lyppy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1356111"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Here's something that may help.  Sensitive sites like PayPal should NOT [snipped]<br><br>As far as the URL check, couldn't that be spoofed too?<br> </DIV>Part of the problem is the intrinsic nature of the Internet itself.  The Internet was not built for security -- it was built to be enduring.  Perhaps the so-called "Internet II" is being constructed with security more in mind.  This, however, may reduce its endurance...<br><SMALL>--<br>HCN: Because you deserve a rest!<BR><BR><br>Free <A HREF="http://teacherweb.ftl.pinecrest.edu/crawfor/apcg/Unit1Omelas.htm">Omelas</A>!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061193</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1356111"><b>Lyppy</b></A> : Here's something that may help.  Sensitive sites like PayPal should NOT provide links in their e-mail addresses. They should direct the user to log into their account as they would normally do from a bookmark. Then inform their users never to follow emailed links and that they will never email a link.<br><br>Since this is an eBay division, why don't they also use an internal email system like eBay itself? I think that works pretty good.  <br><br>Bank of America also displays a picture and term that the user has previously chosen after a successful login, but I guess that could be easily compromised. <br><br>As far as the URL check, couldn't that be spoofed too?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061115</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:18:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/947367"><b>Xizer</b></A> : Anyone who falls for this deserves to have their money stolen.<br><br>I thought this was some uber-new hax thing like actually making paypal.com show up in the address bar when you go to the site, but nope, all you see is some IP address.<br><br>If you're too retarded to watch your address bar, just have Firefox autofill in your username and password in the login bar for paypal.com. If you visit ANY site other than PayPal, it won't show up.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16061005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:03:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060929</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : No actually it's not this "bait and switch" with auto recognition of a second page is very old. Or the populating of fields from a second screen. <br><br>As well I see only one person saying 1,100 people were hooked.<br><br>Where's that number coming from? Is there some confirmation of 1,100 people losing their shirt? Did paypal say ohhh by the way 1,100 people lost their info?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060929</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:53:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060525</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1248858"><b>FiL</b></A> : an give em a staff made of fossil with some kind of "gem of light" thingy on the end of it, illuminating his path. hehe<br><br>g.j. MGD. Keep munchin' away at these noobz.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060525</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:54:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><b>K Patterson</b></A> : He knows the count and has talked to some of them, which likely means that he was able to get into the Phisher's database.  He does that sort of thing.  Maybe we should buy him a white hat and glue it on so he is not tempted by the dark side.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060492</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:49:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060465</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118623"><b>MxxCon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Quick question where did the number of actually exploited customers come from? Who said it was actually 1,100?</DIV>i'm also curious how you know that so many people got hooked<br><SMALL>--<br>[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060465</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:46:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060299</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1"><b>justin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  AnonProxy <A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Look this is nothing that new or amazing. The short version is the answer is in the text and URL.<br> </DIV>It isn't amazing, but it is new. Quite a large step forward in so-phish-tication.<br>Of course it is true that most people who can read message boards on phish techniques know to look at a URL (if their email client is not badly designed), but after that hurdle, this phish becomes more convincing than the average one.<br><br>1000 people losing their identity (And their balances) to a gang in a few days equates to a sizeable bank robbery!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060299</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:16:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060251</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/323381"><b>SCCutler</b></A> : The simple answer, and my unyielding policy, is that I must initiate all communications with any on-line provider of services, and I never initiate that from a link in an email.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060251</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:06:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060232</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : Look this is nothing that new or amazing. The short version is the answer is in the text and URL.<br><br>The URL is not paypal, it for a site on a Korean server. Look at the URL, don't see the www.paypal.com, you don't enter any information.<br><br>If people are too dumb to figure that out...god bless them]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060232</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 10:02:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/388916"><b>AnonProxy</b></A> : Quick question where did the number of actually exploited customers come from? Who said it was actually 1,100?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060217</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:59:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060172</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/884764"><b>BullroarerT</b></A> : What's wrong with this logic:<br>Paypal should monitor its weblogs, and if it sees hundreds of logins from the same IP address, and these logins have mail addresses in a different countries--Shouldn't that arouse their suspicions?  Why can't paypal ban that IP address based on this logic?<br><br>For example, there's probably hundred or so logins from Microsoft's Redmond campus, which probably uses the same IP addy, and these logins all have US addresses.  You could say the same for any large campus whether its a university, business, military base, etc.  However, the phishing attack as described would have paypal mail addreses spread over multiple countries, the majority of which would not be the country of the IP address that's doing the login.<br><br>Of course, the next step for the phisher would be to rent a bot net.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060172</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060145</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641112"><b>nshulga</b></A> : I got one of these. Besides the obvious "don't click on emailed links", the English didn't seem right at all. In a sense, this is kinda funny, as I'm not a native English speaker (not even a very good English speaker).<br><br>So... a question for native English speakers. Do you see anything weird in the way these emails are phrased? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16060145</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:47:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059941</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/672516"><b>retiredat44</b></A> : This is the type I got about 2 or 3 months back...<br>-----------<br>The second example motivates you to log in by telling you that a primary email address was added to your account:<br>------------<br>You can only tell it wasn't from PayPal if you moved your mouse over the link and look at the script readout on the bottom of your eMail client. YOu coould then see some addres with a &raquo;<A HREF="http://****.***.de" >****.***.de</A> like URL.<br><br>It looks exactly like PayPal website, in fact it problably was with a second feed going to the hijackers...<br><br>I tried to post this info earlier a couple months back.. I had sent my copy to PayPal and htye confirmed me it was not from them..<br><br>I really think we should start executing the criminals... whoever is against executing them are assclowns..<br> :mad:<br><br>(don't think you are too smart, if you are half asleep, tired, in a hurry, or not thinking clearly all it takes is a moment of dumbass and you are screwed ...)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059941</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 09:00:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1296791"><b>cothrom</b></A> : Funny,<br>I've been getting these emails for two months, but not on the email address associated with my PayPal account, but the secondary addresses I have put into paypal.  I have not received anything on the address I log in on.<br>Anyone else get it like this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059648</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 07:28:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059348</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/599177"><b>The Gizmo</b></A> : Whenever I get an email like this, I just open a browser or a new browser and goto their site manually (IE: "https://www.paypal.com" if it's paypal) and login. I NEVER ever goto a site like paypal from an email link period. If there's anything important that they need to bring to my attention, paypal will let me know when I login to the real site from their real URL. Actually I always turn off HTML on email, so I can always see the real destination of a URL and not what they make it say.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059348</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 03:34:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059192</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1078318"><b>rob_in_chatt</b></A> : i run the netcraft toolbar and look what i got when i clicked the korean link.......<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16059192?c=1005954&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="141247 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=480 SRC="/r0/download/1005954.thumb600~641647b6872c81ca59285735954b73dc/busted.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059192</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 02:10:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059137</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/627722"><b>furlonium</b></A> : I think a big thing to remember is that when Paypal actually sends you an email, they address you as "Dear (your first name, last name)", not "Dear Paypal Member" or "Dear Paypal User". These bogus emails always are always formatted as the latter.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16059137</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 01:47:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16058620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1355997"><b>savannah27</b></A> : I received a letter, that looked so much like a Paypal letter.,  It stated that they were removing over 800 bucks froim my credit card and were sending two razor phones to this address in Hatfield pa.  First thing I did was call the bank and close off everything.  I got a new account, new cards, new everything.  The letter stated if I did not approve of this shipment to click on an url.  But then the url was not workable.  The bank told me if it happens agin, just dlete it because they ar elooking for info is all.  I don;'t allow junkmail into my account and if it gets thru I delete it.  Something needs to be done because this is the 3rd time its happened to me .   Its just a pain to have to change everything to be on the safe side.   ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16058620</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:28:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16058451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I see these all the time.  If you have an email id that has been spread around for years, you will get lots of phishing attempts, I see these weekly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16058451</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 23:02:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16057029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  kw524 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1230678"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>... I knew better than to fall for that one. Maybe some Lawyers, Engineers, Academic Professionals, Web Consultants, Business owners and Headhunters go seek some common sense courses<br> </DIV>Good point, I see repeatedly that there is no correlation between extended education and common sense.<br><br>I am far more sympathetic to the elderly though, some get phished over and and over. I noticed a while back that some elderly victims that I notified to cancel their credit card, would say "oh no not again". When I inquired as to why, they said that their bank had contacted them twice in the past six months to notify them that there were multiple charges coming in from foreign countries, and their card was compromised. <br><br>These victims did not have any idea how it was happening. I asked them if they routinely responded to emails from Banks etc., then got copies of some of those emails. It was clear that these people were being re targeted over and over. Once they had first responded to a random phish, the phisher would come back and later and hit them with personalized phishes. Because they now new their full name and the issuing banks name, the next phishes would contain their name and the specific bank's name.<br><br>That is why I always tell people to never respond period, using the rule that legitimate mail will always include their name, no longer applies in these cases. <br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16057029</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:13:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/706206"><b>jojadi76</b></A> : I can't understand how come paypal can't or don't want to implement a security feature like e-gold's,&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.e-gold.com/" >www.e-gold.com/</A> they can steal your password BUT if they log in from a different IP or country you need an especial password and email verification in order to log in back again.<br><br>This is the security feature explained:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.e-gold.com/accsent.html" >www.e-gold.com/accsent.html</A><br><br><SMALL>--<br><B>Remember prohibition? it still doesn't work.</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056986</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:08:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056730</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> :  K Patterson <A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> is spot on, that is precisely how it works. A snippet of the source code confirms it. The phishers login.php script has a line: href="ht*tps://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login-run<br><br><div class="code"><PRE><span class="codetext">&lt;html&gt;<br>&lt;head&gt;<br>&lt;title&gt;PayPal - Log In&lt;/title&gt;<br>&lt;meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"&gt;<br>&lt;link href="data.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"&gt;<br>&lt;/head&gt;<br> <br>&lt;body&gt;<br>&lt;TABLE width="620" height="68" border=0 align=center cellPadding=0 cellSpacing=0 class=main&gt;<br>  &lt;TBODY&gt;<br>    &lt;TR&gt;<br>      &lt;TD width="200" noWrap&gt;&lt;A&gt;&lt;IMG <br>      height=50 src="img/logo.gif" width=200 <br>      border=0&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>      &lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>      &lt;TD width="161" align=right noWrap class=pptext&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_registration-run"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sign&amp;nbsp;Up&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/A&gt; | &lt;a href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login-run"&gt;Log&amp;nbsp;In&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;A href="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_help-ext&amp;source_page=p/gen/jobs-outside"&gt;Help&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>    &lt;/TR&gt;<br>    &lt;TR&gt;<br>      &lt;TD height="18" noWrap&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>      &lt;TD width="259"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>      &lt;TD class=pptext noWrap align=right&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;<br>    &lt;/TR&gt;<br>  &lt;/TBODY&gt;<br>&lt;/TABLE&gt;<br>&lt;table width="100%" height="63"  border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" background="img/bg.gif"&gt;</SPAN></PRE></DIV><br>Banning the IP would be an effective method to block this validation and retrieval process. <br><br>MGD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056730</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:40:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056697</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1230678"><b>kw524</b></A> : I'm just a uneducated machinist in upstate N.Y. and I knew better than to fall for that one. Maybe some Lawyers, Engineers, Academic Professionals, Web Consultants, Business owners and Headhunters go seek some common sense courses]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056697</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:36:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056451</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/565356"><b>public</b></A> : Example:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://202.181.96.54/secure/signin.ebay.com.ws.eBayISAPI.dllSignIn+co+partnerId+2+pUserId+siteid+0+pageType+pa1+i1+bshowgif+UsingSSL+ru+pp+pa2+errmsg+runame+ruparams+ruproduct+sid+favoritenav+confirm+ebxPageType+existingEmail/eBayISAPI.dllSignIn-ssPageName-hhsin.php" >202.181.96.54/secure/signin.ebay&middot;&middot;&middot;hsin.php</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16056451</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 19:04:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16055606</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><b>K Patterson</b></A> : Assuming that the Pay Pal system keeps the client database on a server different from their WWW server, that is exactly how it is set up.<br><br>The phisher does not access the database directly.  It logs in to the WWW site just like any other PayPal member, using the user name and password which the yokel provides.<br><br>Until it bans the IP associated with the phisher, there is no way to separate this fake inquiry from a legitimate customer log-in.<br><br>I think it would have been better to have said "sceen scraper" in my earlier post.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16055606</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 17:20:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16055213</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/970911"><b>tdumaine</b></A> : Dude,<br><br>Say im runnin a paypal like service. Lets call it tompal.<br><br>Tompal has 2 servers that runs it. When you go to tompal, server #1 presents you with a login page. Server 1 checks your username/password with my server#2 wich contains all that.<br><br>Set server 2 up to not allow any connections other than from server 1.<br><br>Then the phishers in china wouldnt work cause server 2 wont auth to the outside world.<br><br>Why cant they set it up like this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16055213</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 16:24:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16052889</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1338989"><b>K Patterson</b></A> : I think the answer is that the Phishing site is connecting as though they are a customer and screen washing to get the info from PayPal's reply.<br><br>This whole deal is pretty nasty.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16052889</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 09:47:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16052226</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/970911"><b>tdumaine</b></A> : Cant paypal block requests for authorization from off of thier servers?<br><br>Example:<br><br>I go to paypal.com. Paypal.com wants my login info, so if that ip is requesting to thier server to authenticate, cant they block auth requests from anything but paypal.com's ip?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16052226</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 04:33:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16051413</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  s0tet <A HREF="/useremail/u/1216098"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Thanks for reporting this. Do you have any URLs that are active that you can share? If not I can understand. I wonder if there are any news updates in google on this. I will take a look.<br> </DIV>Sure here is one example, This one is on a Korea Internet Data Center IP:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://211.233.66.55/paypal.com/index.php?bWFpIHByb3N0=aWxvciBtYWkgc3VnZXRpIHB1bGEgZnV0dXZhIG1hbWVsZSBpbiBndXRhIGRlIGxhYmFyaSBjZSBzdW50ZXRpIHNpIGRvYm90b2NpIHBpc2VtYX" >211.233.66.55/paypal.com/index.p&middot;&middot;&middot;Bpc2VtYX</A><br><br>I notified PayPal Thursday and turned over victim data. China and Korea are both difficult to shut down promptly. I was hoping PayPal could block the IP's at their end from coming in, and prevent the phish from validating log ins and then extracting the account data. <br><br>MGD ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16051413</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 23:21:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16051313</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1216098"><b>s0tet</b></A> : Thanks for reporting this. Do you have any URLs that are active that you can share? If not I can understand. I wonder if there are any news updates in google on this. I will take a look.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16051313</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 23:01:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[Phishing] ALERT!! New Vicious PAYPAL phishing</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16050890</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/666842"><b>MGD</b></A> : Within the past week a new to me breed of Paypal phishing has started making the rounds. There are now several in circulation, and based on the success rate I expect them to proliferate just like the Chase phishes did a few months back.<br><br>Within 72 hours one of these Paypal phishes has ensnared over 1,100 victim accounts. It was targeted by multiple spams that used various referral links on hijacked machines. In the two years that I have been digesting and extracting phish data, I have never seen any that came close to 1,100 victims in a little over two days. In fact, I have never seen anything even close to that rate regardless of the up-time or the phish type. As far as I am concerned this is a record.<br><br>What makes these Paypals so unique and vicious, is that they are scripted to interface with the real Paypal site. They not only validate the users credentials in real time, but also extract and display the users account details on the phish page. Whatever reservations and suspicions a potential victim may have, they will undoubtedly be overcome by the fact that after logging into the phish site, their account details will be retrieved from Paypal and displayed on the page. They are then asked to confirm their credit card number, enter their SSN number, and confirm their address.<br><br>I can tell you that these phishes are luring a wide range of people in several countries. The range of victims includes Lawyers, Engineers, Academic Professionals, Web Consultants, Business owners, Headhunters, you name it, they are in there.<br><br>These are two examples of the original spam. This one gives you a deadline for updating your account:<br><br>[attachment=1]<br><br>The second example motivates you to log in by telling you that a primary email address was added to your account:<br><br>[attachment=2]<br><br>These are two examples of the login screens that victims are presented with when they click on the links in the spam mail. Only the IP address prefix in the URL is the give away that this is a bogus site.<br><br>[attachment=3]<br><br>The fake SSL key after secure log in should be a warning sign:<br><br>[attachment=4]<br><br>Once the victim enters their User ID and Password the script submits the data to the real Paypal for validation. An incorrect User ID and or Password will return this:<br><br>[attachment=5]<br><br>Once the victim successfully logs in, their complete data set is retrieved from Paypal and presented on the page. Once the victim gets this far, any doubts that they may have about being at the "legitimate" site should now be removed.<br><br>First they are presented with their first and last name from the account displayed right after "Dear". In addition to showing their current email address/ log in, the page also shows the last four digits of their credit card that is currently on file, along with the expiration date. They are then prompted to re enter/confirm the card number so the phisher can now capture it, as paypal will only display the last four digits. Also, they are asked to confirm their mailing address, and to round out the complete theft of their identity their Social Security number is needed:<br><br>[attachment=6]<br><br>Notice the last sentence in the above <I>"Protecting the security of your PayPal account is our primary concern, and we apologize for any <B>incontinence</B> it may cause</I>. If the the victim gives up all that data it will surely cause a bout of "incontinence" in a week or two when the statements start to roll in.<br><br>Even if the victim decides to back out at this stage, and not enter or confirm anything, the phisher has already captured the PayPal User ID and Password.<br><br>Here is where the "billing" address is entered:<br><br>[attachment=7]<br><br>Another version of the Paypal "interactive" phish actually retrieves and displays the victims address currently on file with PayPal:<br><br>[attachment=8]<br><br>There is no question that based on the current success rate, this integrated phishing will become rampant. Again 1,100 validated accounts in less than 3 days driven by multiple spams that have referrals on hijacked boxes in the US with the phish pages stashed in either China or Korea, will quickly become the phish du jour. It is readily apparent that a wide spectrum of people are falling for it.<br><br>MGD<br><SMALL>EDIT=typo+added text</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005447&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="20236 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=425 SRC="/r0/download/1005447.thumb600~5d216628a3c5d43dd5fcc3da3596c3c0/PayPal_Spam1.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005448&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="15498 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=384 SRC="/r0/download/1005448.thumb600~f1988655358b166d1e1ddb9cb87c862d/PayPal_Spam2.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005449&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="147738 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=439 SRC="/r0/download/1005449.thumb600~ebc68e7a4c72a8503a7ea602b4b58b0d/PhishA_login3.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005450&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="20925 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=435 SRC="/r0/download/1005450.thumb600~96b88ab31a9a6258a34446baaf8d3bc3/PhishLogin4.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005453&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="151715 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=439 SRC="/r0/download/1005453.thumb600~f4c1b8125e08dab2d374e8a9ef56bc86/PhishA_LoginFail5.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005454&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="66083 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1005454.thumb600~a98fceeda007921ef37d61659521ad35/PhishA_data6.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005455&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="44701 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=437 SRC="/r0/download/1005455.thumb600~ecf95fb80b72cef036450b87f53e33ba/Phish_data7.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16050890?c=1005456&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjA1NTIxMy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="23761 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=435 SRC="/r0/download/1005456.thumb600~6eb8d3ff491d2e20f057cac60cd15d22/Phish_data8.png/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16050890</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 21:34:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
