<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Won&#x27;t 802.11n cut the cost, radios, &#x26; improve the quality in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16123272</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:39:56 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:39:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Won&#x27;t 802.11n cut the cost, radios, &#x26; improve the quality</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16123272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : It would seem that we're close enough now to 802.11n that a city the size of Houston ought to lay the plan out...do the basic infrastructure work for placing the Access Points...and THEN place the radios/ACs. <br><br>By the time they get all this worked out they ought to be able to get an 802.11n solution from Cisco that would save them a lot of money on Access Points and really make the WiFi network something to be proud of!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16123272</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 14:39:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
