<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: I would try it in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16142017</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:23:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:23:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16142017</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1005135"><b>jimbo2150</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bassthumpa <A HREF="/useremail/u/271204"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Cable companies offering prices like that are few and far in between as far as I know.</DIV>Ya, TW offers cable here too, for much more dough. For the most part they offer the same channels (except TW looks like they offer more premium channels).<br><br>You should see if there are any other companies offering lower-cost cable in your area.<br><SMALL>--<br> - "Techie" Jim</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16142017</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 21 May 2006 13:22:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16119642</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/787069"><b>attsbcisgay</b></A> : comcast right now is 6/384<br>and 8/768?<br>but even the lower tier of uverse is 1mbps upload so that can be useful for uploading purpose like to a website that you are a webmaster.<br><br>right to brag or anything but it would make sense for me to upgrade as well to this new tier<br>who knows I might get 750kb/sec, 125kb/sec <br>now that's awesome <br>like I said we'll see. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16119642</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:29:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16119567</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/830427"><b>steevio</b></A> : My Comcast package advertises 8M/768k, and guess what, I consistantly get 8.2M/730k  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16119567</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 23:15:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16117336</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641190"><b>imrf</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Primis1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1218511"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>No... Comcast will *list* 10/1.  Comcast will *not* deliver those speeds or anything approaching though -- they never do.</DIV>Just because *you* may have had issues with Comcast, that doesn't mean every place has that same problem. I know many people around here that have no problem getting their full 8Mbps/768Kbps speeds all the time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16117336</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:00:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114900</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/879997"><b>dadkins</b></A> : Not everyone is into El Cheapo DSL packages either. <br>Some people wish to have a little horsepower at their fingertips. <br><br>I remember your claims of abuse letters... with a grain of salt. Also remember you stating that your Comcast was down more than up, so bandwidth wasn't possible, was it? <br><br>*HERE*, with Standard cable TV(no digital,HD, or DVR), my 8mbps is $52.95 and worth it!<br>Total cable bill is $105.33 with ~$3 fees included.<br>Sure as hell not going to pay $62 per month for DSL @ 1100k downstream!<br><br>Maybe it's a market thing, but please don't make blanket statements about Comcast. *MY* Comcast services are great!<br><br>I'm sorry you had/have bad experience(s) with them. Some(most) of us have not.  ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>Think outside the Fox... <A HREF="http://www.opera.com/">Opera</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114900</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 11:56:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/271204"><b>bassthumpa</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jimbo2150 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1005135"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Not even competition. Just as stated before. Price for Full digital cable and lowest internet tier (1.5mb down) is between $55-$65/month! You think I want to upgrade to a similar tier for $85/month?!?! {LAUGHS} </DIV>Cable companies offering prices like that are few and far in between as far as I know.  I pay nearly $80/mo for Time Warner for just TV, and that's just with one DVR.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://bassthumpa.blogspot.com/">Drippings from my brain stem...</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114513</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:43:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114471</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1005135"><b>jimbo2150</b></A> : Not even competition. Just as stated before. Price for Full digital cable and lowest internet tier (1.5mb down) is between $55-$65/month! You think I want to upgrade to a similar tier for $85/month?!?! {LAUGHS}<br><br>I will be switching to cable's 10/1 tier as soon as my ATT contract expires. They had the balls to offer a 6/7xx for the same price as the 10/1 tier (for a while)... {scoffs...}<br><br>I don't even have digital cable, just basic. Rarely ever watch TV. I just want internet plain and simple. With a video boom on the horizon there will soon be enough TV on the internet (BOTH free AND paid) for any TV-phile.<br><br>Guess I will never see any competition here as long as ATT has outrageous prices and a "no one needs fast internet" attitude. Goodbye ATT.<br><SMALL>--<br> - "Techie" Jim</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114471</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:35:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114367</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1218511"><b>Primis1</b></A> : No... Comcast will *list* 10/1.  Comcast will *not* deliver those speeds or anything approaching though -- they never do.<br><br>And yes, there is a very, very big difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114367</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:16:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114293</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/930918"><b>Jonbo298</b></A> : I wouldn't mind lowering my current speed from 9/1 to 6/1 if I could get most/all the channels I have right now with Cox and internet for about $130-$140. But since ATT doesn't service Omaha, nope :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114293</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:03:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1114904"><b>oliphant</b></A> : Not everyone is into speed (or monthly download caps)...some are into price hence the massive sales increase of DSL over their cheap-o-the-week $15 DSL offerings.  In our Comcast franchise video+HSI is very expense, WAY higher than $85 AT&T would be charging.  Base digital "classic" is $57 and base internet here is $46 (with bundling discounts) and that is for only 384 upload and nastygram limited service (I've gotten 2 from Comcast over the years).  That amounts to a 20% higher cost.  Top tier 8Mb starts at $56 and that is with bundling "discounts" running the fees even higher.  Some would consider Comcast's very high "prices" to be a joke especially if they aren't heavy downloaders.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114277</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 10:00:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/462602"><b>CO_Chris</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MikeStammer <A HREF="/useremail/u/742449"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><BR><BR>i would dump comcast and try the U-Verse 300 package. i have 6 Mb DSL from them now and its great. 10 Mb would pwn! TV is TV, i want the Innanet speed! =)<br><br>Now all they have to do is offer it in IL...<br> </DIV>Yea But Comcast will be at 10/1 or More by year end. They all ready have this where FIOS is.<div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16114116?c=1009638&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjE0MjAxNy54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="91150 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1009638.thumb600~63f52a6bdc5c7293e1ad65c0360c4d15/untitled.JPG/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>What a Joke</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114116</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 09:32:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>I would try it</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114072</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/742449"><b>MikeStammer</b></A> : i would dump comcast and try the U-Verse 300 package. i have 6 Mb DSL from them now and its great. 10 Mb would pwn! TV is TV, i want the Innanet speed! =)<br><br>Now all they have to do is offer it in IL...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16114072</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 09:24:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
