site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

reply to kamm

Re: The .xxx registry sues US gov!

said by kamm:

Pal, you really need to study some basics, believe me. You're totally ignorant, it's more than obvious.
If I'm ignorant than how so; you won't point it out cause you got nothing, you get your opinions from someone else so once someone steps outside the bounds of what they've prepared you for you resort to name calling and vague, information-less retorts.

The fact remains that only one group who had direct interest in the xxx domain actually wanted it, and that is the registrar who hoped to make money off of all the people who would feel the need to register the hostname they have under .com and .net under .xxx either to protect their branding as a porn site or to protect their branding by black-holing the domain (ie: microsoft would likely register microsoft.xxx to make it resolve to nothing). It was a bad idea that every anti-ICANN group is going to latch onto as their banner because it looks like a good idea to the general public who doesn't understand that it's existence doesn't mean that you can accurately filter porn just by it's tld.
--
Behold the future:
The Sony Playboxwii 361.5DS


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

1 edit

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

Pal, you really need to study some basics, believe me. You're totally ignorant, it's more than obvious.
If I'm ignorant than how so; you won't point it out cause you got nothing, you get your opinions from someone else so once someone steps outside the bounds of what they've prepared you for you resort to name calling and vague, information-less retorts.

The fact remains that only one group who had direct interest in the xxx domain actually wanted it, and that is the registrar who hoped to make money off of all the people who would feel the need to register the hostname they have under .com and .net under .xxx either to protect their branding as a porn site or to protect their branding by black-holing the domain (ie: microsoft would likely register microsoft.xxx to make it resolve to nothing). It was a bad idea that every anti-ICANN group is going to latch onto as their banner because it looks like a good idea to the general public who doesn't understand that it's existence doesn't mean that you can accurately filter porn just by it's tld.
Despite you have really tried hard to behave like somebody educated person, you've failed. :P
(The other choice, that you are deliberately avoiding the real subject, well that'd way too smart, I guess...)

The problem is when you don't even see the lack of substance in your idea - as I said it's kinda funny to see every time when pseudo-intelligent mouthpieces trashing Poobah then they post something utterly ignorant stuff without even noticing it... :P


Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
kudos:1

said by kamm:

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

Pal, you really need to study some basics, believe me. You're totally ignorant, it's more than obvious.
If I'm ignorant than how so; you won't point it out cause you got nothing, you get your opinions from someone else so once someone steps outside the bounds of what they've prepared you for you resort to name calling and vague, information-less retorts.

The fact remains that only one group who had direct interest in the xxx domain actually wanted it, and that is the registrar who hoped to make money off of all the people who would feel the need to register the hostname they have under .com and .net under .xxx either to protect their branding as a porn site or to protect their branding by black-holing the domain (ie: microsoft would likely register microsoft.xxx to make it resolve to nothing). It was a bad idea that every anti-ICANN group is going to latch onto as their banner because it looks like a good idea to the general public who doesn't understand that it's existence doesn't mean that you can accurately filter porn just by it's tld.
Despite you have really tried hard to behave like somebody educated person, you've failed. :P
(The other choice, that you are deliberately avoiding the real subject, well that'd way too smart, I guess...)

The problem is when you don't even see the lack of substance in your idea - as I said it's kinda funny to see every time when pseudo-intelligent mouthpieces trashing Poobah then they post something utterly ignorant stuff without even noticing it... :P
"somebody educated person".... wtf? You once AGAIN have shown how utterly ignorant you are, you can't even make a comprehensible sentence, and along with half of the spelling mistakes, and you call me a high school drop out? I think you need to take a look into the mirror pal. And you are going BACK on ignore, and I know I said it last time, you are not coming off this time.


Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

1 edit

reply to kamm

said by kamm:

**plonk**
So why are you posting waaaaaaaay back here instead of the newer topic?

Silly Kamm, you lose again. And the fact that you're hiding way back here when you could of posted in the more current makes it pretty evident that you just want to get the last word in and hope no one notices.
--
Behold the future:
The Sony Playboxwii 361.5DS


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Cheese

said by Cheese:

"somebody educated person".... wtf? You once AGAIN have shown how utterly ignorant you are, you can't even make a comprehensible sentence, and along with half of the spelling mistakes, and you call me a high school drop out?
Ouch.
HINT: I'm not a native English-speaking person, genius. I knew you'd never be able to figure out on your own, hence this hint...

BTW the classic evidence of a HS dropout troll without arguments in any topic when the troll starts nitpicking on typos - that's always the time when you have to call the trollbusters...

I think you need to take a look into the mirror pal. And you are going BACK on ignore, and I know I said it last time, you are not coming off this time.
Yawn. As I said you have yet to prove you actually know more about *anythinng* than an average US HS student (= barely educated at worldwide level).


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Combat Chuck

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

**plonk**
So why are you posting waaaaaaaay back here instead of the newer topic?

Silly Kamm, you lose again. And the fact that you're hiding way back here when you could of posted in the more current makes it pretty evident that you just want to get the last word in and hope no one notices.
Are you high? WHo's losing and what? Who's hiding?

The fact is you couldn't caugh up a coherent argument, period.
Wake me up when you have been able to finally grasp the original point in my post.


Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
kudos:1

reply to Combat Chuck

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

**plonk**
So why are you posting waaaaaaaay back here instead of the newer topic?

Silly Kamm, you lose again. And the fact that you're hiding way back here when you could of posted in the more current makes it pretty evident that you just want to get the last word in and hope no one notices.
Why anyone bothers with this fu**ing clown anymore is beyond me. It's going to be funny the day he is banned for going over board. I'll for one be laughing


Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

1 edit

reply to kamm

said by kamm:

Are you high?
no

said by kamm:

WHo's losing and what?
You're losing because people called you out and you don't respond with anything other than calling people stupid. I gave you a retort you're little news sites didn't give you any preparation for then you resorted to calling me clueless and ignorant instead of saying why I was or why .xxx should have continued to have been pushed thru once it was determined that those who it was marketed to didn't want it and that it wouldn't have solved the thing it was created to solve.

said by kamm:

Who's hiding?
You are. Why else would you, one of the more vocal members on certain issues, suddenly become quiet until a news post falls off the front page once someone calls your bluff.

By the way, I linked this thread in the newer post so you should probably go hide again.

--edit--
annnnnnnnd bookmarked
--
Behold the future:
The Sony Playboxwii 361.5DS


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Cheese

said by Cheese:

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

**plonk**
So why are you posting waaaaaaaay back here instead of the newer topic?

Silly Kamm, you lose again. And the fact that you're hiding way back here when you could of posted in the more current makes it pretty evident that you just want to get the last word in and hope no one notices.
Why anyone bothers with this fu**ing clown anymore is beyond me. It's going to be funny the day he is banned for going over board. I'll for one be laughing
Yakyakyak, har-har-har... The usual "content" from a pretty cheesee kid...


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Combat Chuck

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

Are you high?
no

said by kamm:

WHo's losing and what?
You're losing because people called you out and you don't respond with anything other than calling people stupid.
Pal, you barely could put together a meaningful post WRT my post.
All of your post was about something else than my point.


I gave you a retort you're little news sites didn't give you any preparation for then you resorted to calling me clueless and ignorant instead of saying why I was or why .xxx should have continued to have been pushed thru once it was determined that those who it was marketed to didn't want it and that it wouldn't have solved the thing it was created to solve.
You apparently couldn't even grasp my point - don't blame others for your own reading comprehension problems.

As I already wrote above, wake me up when you think you are able to challenge me on *anything*.

said by kamm:

Who's hiding?
You are. Why else would you, one of the more vocal members on certain issues, suddenly become quiet until a news post falls off the front page once someone calls your bluff.
WTF are you talking about? You must be high.

By the way, I linked this thread in the newer post so you should probably go hide again.

--edit--
annnnnnnnd bookmarked


Man... you have severe mental problems, seriously. You have to see a doctor.


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

reply to Combat Chuck

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

**plonk**
So why are you posting waaaaaaaay back here instead of the newer topic?

I though only retards can't use BBR's pretty cool interface... have you ever noticed that "My..." menu? If you click on that there's another one - Wow! Shocking, huh? - which says "Posts"! Now read together: "My" "Posts" - WOW, MY POSTS! You got it?
Now CLICK ON IT! Wow, ALL OF YOUR POSTS!
How cool is that...!
.
.
.
.
.


Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

reply to kamm

said by kamm:

Durrrrr
Oh I'm sorry I meant

said by kamm:

Durrrrr
Good job waiting until the other one dropped before posting here after I told you I had linked here.

It's not at all obvious.

Just FYI. Next time you start flailing about wildly trying to avoid looking stupid cause you can't think for yourself I'm just gonna link here again.
--
Behold the future:
The Sony Playboxwii 361.5DS


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

Still unable to put up a meaningful challenge and/or argument?
What a surprise...



Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA

said by kamm:

Still unable to put up a meaningful challenge and/or argument?
What a surprise...
Yeah I did, way back here:
»The .xxx registry sues US gov!

You've fallen into stupid argument trick number 14, accuse your adversary of doing what they accuse you of doing.
--
Behold the future:
The Sony Playboxwii 361.5DS


Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
kudos:1

said by Combat Chuck:

said by kamm:

Still unable to put up a meaningful challenge and/or argument?
What a surprise...
Yeah I did, way back here:
»The .xxx registry sues US gov!

You've fallen into stupid argument trick number 14, accuse your adversary of doing what they accuse you of doing.
ROFL, Owned.

Sunday, 27-May 20:32:47 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics