KearnstdElf WizardPremium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to Pictor Guy
Re: The real question is... cable has much greater reach, which brings to question why is DSL so range limited. id think by now it could go 20,000-30,000 feet with modern tech.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
|
|
| Innacurate and bad logic. Cable doesn't have an incredible reach. It just has greater node deployment. The signal still needs to be generated or repeated every so far.
DSL is ranger limiited much the way ethernet is range limited. |
|
 KompressorPremium
join:2002-02-12
Huntington Beach, CA | reply to Kearnstd
While the name Digital Subscriber Line DSL sounds good, it is a horrible technology. |
|
| said by kompressor :
While the name Digital Subscriber Line DSL sounds good, it is a horrible technology.
Neither cable or dsl is better. Both are pretty much evenly matched. |
|
| reply to Kompressor
Based on your other post on this thread I don't believe you to be familiar in the least with xDSL. |
|
