Re: So sure....... in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16206669 en Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:32:14 EDT Wed, 03 Dec 2008 16:32:14 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16210169 SD6 : Oh, you were calling me on a "political cheap shot"? I was probably confused because that's not what you said. When you said "he lost to a dead person's wife, but don't let the facts get in the way" I thought you were accusing me of misstating the facts and, of course, I had to show that I didn't.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16210169 Wed, 31 May 2006 20:30:10 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16208946 footballdude :
said by SD6 See Profile :

I understand his losing to a dead man may be an embarassing thing and there are other extenuating circumstances, but don't say I've got my facts wrong when you obviously know I don't.
If you understand the extenuating circumstances but choose to ignore them in order to take a political cheap shot, then you shouldn't be surprised when someone calls you on it.
--
If Darwin was right and evolution really works, why are there so many stupid people out there?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16208946 Wed, 31 May 2006 17:35:12 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16208142 SD6 : My statement was correct. The cold hard honest objective fact is Carnahan (not his wife) was the candidate on the ballot and Ashcroft lost to him. I understand his losing to a dead man may be an embarassing thing and there are other extenuating circumstances, but don't say I've got my facts wrong when you obviously know I don't. I understand your synopsis of events, but that is your version of the story and you are the one trying to keep the facts from getting in the way. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16208142 Wed, 31 May 2006 15:45:35 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16206669 sporkme :
said by footballdude See Profile :

If Darwin was right and evolution really works, why are there so many stupid people out there?
My thoughts exactly.
--
Day dreaming days in a daydream nation]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16206669 Wed, 31 May 2006 12:17:20 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16206244 footballdude :
said by SD6 See Profile :

Oh please. She was not a viable candidate and no one voted for HER. She was just a standin acting as a proxy for the dead guy.
When Governor Carnahan's plane went down, Ashcroft had a six point lead in the polls. He immediately suspended his campaign. The St Louis Post Dispatch and the Kansas City Star went into overdrive to promote the governor's wife as a great senatorial candidate. It was too late to change the name on the ballot but everyone knew they were voting for her instead of the dead man. So with Ashcroft not campaigning and the newspapers beating a daily drum about how wonderful Ms Carnahan was, and with an election rife with fraud, Carnahan eeked out a victory by a handful of votes. The cry immediately went out for Ashcroft to contest the election results but he gracefully declined, saying he hoped her victory would bring her and her family some peace. A few weeks later when Ashcroft was nominated for Attorney General, Carnahan had the audacity to vote against him. She was summarily dismissed by voters in the next election.
--
If Darwin was right and evolution really works, why are there so many stupid people out there?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16206244 Wed, 31 May 2006 11:06:39 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16205853 SD6 :
said by footballdude See Profile :

said by SD6 See Profile :

I didn't think we could get worse than John Ashcroft, the guy who lost to a dead person in an election
Actually, he lost to a dead person's wife. But don't let the facts get in the way.
Oh please. She was not a viable candidate and no one voted for HER. She was just a standin acting as a proxy for the dead guy.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16205853 Wed, 31 May 2006 09:55:47 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16205664 footballdude :
said by SD6 See Profile :

I didn't think we could get worse than John Ashcroft, the guy who lost to a dead person in an election
Actually, he lost to a dead person's wife. But don't let the facts get in the way.
--
If Darwin was right and evolution really works, why are there so many stupid people out there?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16205664 Wed, 31 May 2006 09:28:14 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202762 dvd536 :
said by Maggs See Profile :

"Possesion or storage of pixelated images is a felony."

I can see it now.
So does that mean i'm a felon when i turn on cox digital cable tv?
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202762 Tue, 30 May 2006 20:30:00 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202033 Cheese :
said by Maggs See Profile :

No remember it's pixelated child porn... that's different. it's harder to see the actual porn. So the pixels cover them.

You can't charge pixels with child porn possession yet.

Executive Order # 19002 in the works ;)

"Possesion or storage of pixelated images is a felony."

I can see it now.
:o]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202033 Tue, 30 May 2006 18:36:17 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202028 Maggs : No remember it's pixelated child porn... that's different. it's harder to see the actual porn. So the pixels cover them.

You can't charge pixels with child porn possession yet.

Executive Order # 19002 in the works ;)

"Possesion or storage of pixelated images is a felony."

I can see it now.
--
When the lights go out, just draw a KMAP, and all is good.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16202028 Tue, 30 May 2006 18:35:21 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200522 RayW : Notice - it said PIXELATED. That means all the parts the perverts get their jollies on have been obscured. You would be surprised at how much of that stuff goes across the computers of the porn squads, and how many rich and famous people are thought to be involved.

A friend of mine worked a missing child case a while back, never did find the kid or the kidnapper(s) but they think (note: no hard proof, he could have been killed and ground up for dog food) they traced him to one of several countries outside of the US as part of a sex slave operation. It is a bigger problem than most people are aware of. Slavery is still alive and well in the world, despite its brief official existence and demise in the US of A.

Do not know if making a law that creates zetta-words (2^70) or more of storage requirements will do any good for this issue. Those people will just stop using a home/office link and do wi-fi, libraries, and cafes.

I also note that the article talked about TELECOMS, what about the smaller independents, where they consulted on how this would work?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200522 Tue, 30 May 2006 14:25:52 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200348 SD6 : The Supreme Court struck down the last similar Internet law whose justification was child porn. Gonzalez seems to want to set a new low for Attorneys General. I didn't think we could get worse than John Ashcroft, the guy who lost to a dead person in an election, but Gonzalez may end up being worse.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200348 Tue, 30 May 2006 14:00:37 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200250 Cheese :
said by Jigsaw See Profile :

said by Cheese See Profile :

They can pass around child porn to get their point across, why not arrest them for child porn possession?
You can ask yourself this to Who is watching them?In my book the biggest crooks/Criminals are running our Government into the ground may i add as well.....
Apparently no one is if they are doing this. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200250 Tue, 30 May 2006 13:47:28 EDT Re: So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200241 Jigsaw :
said by Cheese See Profile :

They can pass around child porn to get their point across, why not arrest them for child porn possession?
You can ask yourself this to Who is watching them?In my book the biggest crooks/Criminals are running our Government into the ground may i add as well.....
--
»www.auralmoon.com/html/ Stimulating ears for 6 years]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200241 Tue, 30 May 2006 13:45:49 EDT So sure....... http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200205 Cheese : They can pass around child porn to get their point across, why not arrest them for child porn possession?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16200205 Tue, 30 May 2006 13:39:14 EDT