<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Capped by modem? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16213370</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:53:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:53:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16226612</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/787069"><b>attsbcisgay</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  dvd536 <A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BloodRoses <A HREF="/useremail/u/786649"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Modern DOCSIS systems don't rely on a modem cap, so to answer your question... no.<br> </DIV>then what are the:<br>MAXUPSTREAM=<br>MAXDOWNSTREAM=<br>in the modem config file for?<br> </DIV>Speed are as follow...<br>Since they are antipeers or antisharing upload will remain the same however.<br><br>12.0/384<br>16.0/768<br><br>This will boost your download speed @ 4.99 bucks for 24hrs period<br>if you need it for 10 days, 50 bucks is good money for Comcast revenues<br><br>FIOS will probably have to boost their cap after this! woohoo! <br>$$$ <br><br>Don'tyou just love capitalism? I mean. corporalism.<br> :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16226612</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:05:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16220580</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1202420"><b>GhostDoggy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jjoshua <A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  GhostDoggy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1202420"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Bandwidth is not a QoS. Traffic shaping is different from packet labeling for prioritizing.<br> </DIV>Still, the hard cap set by the modem would be raised and traffic would be managed by the network, no?<br> </DIV>Yes, managed bandwidth on the network-side. Still, that is called traffic shaping, not QoS. QoS is <I>Quality</I> of Service, <B>not</B> Quantity of Service.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16220580</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:30:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16218934</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1142851"><b>LinuxJunkie</b></A> : Essentially unused in most cable deployments now. All speed-related configurations are at the CMTS headend now -- they control it, not your modem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16218934</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 23:38:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16218105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BloodRoses <A HREF="/useremail/u/786649"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Modern DOCSIS systems don't rely on a modem cap, so to answer your question... no.<br> </DIV>then what are the:<br>MAXUPSTREAM=<br>MAXDOWNSTREAM=<br>in the modem config file for?<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16218105</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 21:22:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16214312</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/786649"><b>BloodRoses</b></A> : Modern DOCSIS systems don't rely on a modem cap, so to answer your question... no.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16214312</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 12:31:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213679</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><b>jjoshua</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  GhostDoggy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1202420"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Bandwidth is not a QoS. Traffic shaping is different from packet labeling for prioritizing.<br> </DIV>Still, the hard cap set by the modem would be raised and traffic would be managed by the network, no?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213679</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:40:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213370</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1202420"><b>GhostDoggy</b></A> : Bandwidth is not a QoS. Traffic shaping is different from packet labeling for prioritizing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213370</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:44:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Capped by modem?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213230</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><b>jjoshua</b></A> : I though that speeds were capped by the modem?<br><br>I guess that we'll all get higher caps and bandwidth will be managed somewhere else?<br><br>Managed QoS?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16213230</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:19:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
