ok.. but the fact remains that only people who have paid for the content have access to it. The content providers are trying to have a double dip on the cable co. who in turn charges the consumer for access. I would agree if they were selling the product to a different customer, but servicing the same market with the same product, imo, the value of damage in this case is nill.
One would think that the opportunity to increase the following of this content would be embraced by the people who create it.
Or maybe they just think we are a bunch of sheep