 VigThread-safe since 1997Premium
join:2004-03-23
San Diego, CA | reply to qdemn7
Re: A la carte will end up with less choice I'm inclined to agree on the face of it, but I have this nagging thought. If it would actually give the cable companies a way to make more money than they do now, why are they against it? There must be something more going on to make them prefer the status quo.
--
Visit the land of the never-setting sun |
|
b10010011Whats a Posting tag?
join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA Reviews:
 ·Comcast Formerl..
1 edit | said by Vig:I'm inclined to agree on the face of it, but I have this nagging thought. If it would actually give the cable companies a way to make more money than they do now, why are they against it? There must be something more going on to make them prefer the status quo. Because bundeling is not just how the cable company sells channels, it is also how they buy them. They have to pay for channels that nobody watches they get from the conted providers just like we have to pay for the channels we don't watch.
Also it will force them to go all digital requireing system upgrades and cable boxes in every houshold (but they will be able to charge for that) and they will need more/better billing software to handle everyone picky choices, more support staff...
In the end it's going to cost the cable companies a lot of money to switch over to a la carte programming and that cost WILL be passed on to consumers.
A la carte is NOT going to lower anyones cable bill. In the long run it will only lower the number of channels you get to chose from. |
|
| Amen, and I have no desire to pay for multiple digital boxes. Actually, I have no desire to pay for even one digital box. |
|
