| 6Mbps Yeah, 6Mbps is more than enough for "average" users. For those that just check their email, and visit a few websites, 6Mbps is overkill.
However, it's not enough for some of us users (including myself). Hopefully, this 6Mbps will just be in the beginning, with speed upgrades later. |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
1 edit | I wonder....
AT&T's new Bursting Technology |
--
The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind. |
|
 kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY | reply to pepperxn
Re: 6Mbps said by pepperxn:Yeah, 6Mbps is more than enough for "average" users. For those that just check their email, and visit a few websites, 6Mbps is overkill. Your "average user" definition is quite outdated - users nowadays watch videos or download files.
Shocking, huh? It wasn't part of the everyday use last time you have checked, circa 1996, huh?
However, it's not enough for some of us users (including myself). Hopefully, this 6Mbps will just be in the beginning, with speed upgrades later.
It's not enough for anybody except some slowed-down folks in the boonies who only checks emails. |
|
| reply to Transmaster
Re: I wonder.... Cogeco in Canada seems to have it right. I am a standard subscriber that pays 45cdn a month for 7mbs which they just increased from 5mbs with no price increase.
or you can have the pro package which is 10meg/1meg service. I had it for about 6 months, and decided 70 dollars a month wasn't worth those few sites that downloaded at 1100Kb/sec |
|
|
|
| reply to kamm
Re: 6Mbps
Kamm, why are you such a grump? We know you love us, buddy, but your posts are allways filled with smart assed vitrol. I'd probably fall down gasping if I were to see a post from you that actually showed some thought and was not in attack mode, like you are smarter and know more than everyone here and how dare we express an opinion.
Step back and breathe, buddy. You'll have a thrombosis. |
|
| reply to Pete_64
Re: I wonder.... said by Pete_64:Cogeco in Canada seems to have it right. I am a standard subscriber that pays 45cdn a month for 7mbs which they just increased from 5mbs with no price increase. or you can have the pro package which is 10meg/1meg service. I had it for about 6 months, and decided 70 dollars a month wasn't worth those few sites that downloaded at 1100Kb/sec THIS I COULD UNDERSTAND
but why some wanting to downgrade from 6.0 to 3.0 to save 10 bucks a month is insane... needs prozac?
 |
|
