<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16322473</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:56:32 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 02:56:32 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/669632"><b>KB2PSM</b></A> : Hey, redeem yourself...contact every single one of those folks and post back completely true and unbiased results.<br><br>We are waiting...<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I bet if you did a survey not a single one needed a HAM other than to "chit chat".  Or if they did use it for something it could of been done easier with a cell phone.<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331666</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:56:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331636</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/669632"><b>KB2PSM</b></A> : You are a troll by history...<br>quick to post a factually void and baseless comment only to never return to give proof of your claims or to refute the intelligent responses of others.<br><br>Not all of us exist in a vacuum.<br><br>Rob<br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>How is that trolling? Its just stating what everyone is thinking.  Trolling would be me saying "HAMS suck, wish they would all disappear".  I know HAMs are use full, but not in USA anymore (minus Alaska and Hawaii perhaps).<br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331636</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:51:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16329605</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641690"><b>p51d007</b></A> : I pray you never have a natural disaster that takes down your phone lines, electric grid & cell phones, because that Amateur radio operator may be the only communications you have.<br><br>73's<br>kb0gnk]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16329605</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:52:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16328186</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  PDXPLT <A HREF="/useremail/u/908026"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  rf_engineer <A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>BPL has no wireless spectrum to stay in - it's a wired network therefore it has no frequency allocations....just like cable and DSL which deliver broadband just fine without wrecking spectrum.<br> </DIV>Well, that's close but not <I>quite</I> true.  Licensed services in a portion of spectrum have primary allocations or secondary allocations, but they are rarely exclusive (some of the radio astronomy bands probably being the only ones).  Licensed-exempt users under Part 15 are the bottom of the totem pole, but they are explicitly permitted under Part 15 to radiate RF power in certain bands as an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator.  This can even lead to some degree of interference, so long as such interference does not lead to the level of "harmful" (that's why those electric drills can remain on the market), and in addition, the license-exempt user must accept harmful interference from any source.</DIV>What you're saying is true, but it doesn't have any bearing on my original statement.  BPL has no wireless frequency allocations.  Maybe this is just a discussion of semantics, but being allowed to intentionally or unintentionally emit radiation does not constitute a frequency allocation.  Most people would consider a primary or secondary frequency allocation, a frequency allocation....as the name would suggest.  The context of my response was to a poster that implied ham radio and BPL should stay on their own frequencies.  BPL has no such frequencies.<br><br><div class="bquote">I know ARRL lawyers disagree with this portion of the law, and argue in nearly all of their filings with the FCC that the Commission has no authority to authorize Part 15 operation in the first place.  But they've been trying for over 25 years to win that point, and haven't done so yet (I suppose that's why the position the ARRL takes in press releases to the public and their membership is a much more reasonable one than this official position they take in the FCC filings.  Or maybe they have no idea what their lawyers are doing).</DIV>You or someone claimed this here before and I asked for some quote or something to support this, but I haven't seen anything.  The ARRL has questioned the FCC's ability to allow BPL under Part 15 as the rules were clearly never written with broadband large geographical emitters in mind, but never their authority to authorize Part 15 devices.  That would be just plain stupid, since every piece of electronics gear in the US and even ham radio equipment is allowed to exist under Part 15.  The ARRL's public and FCC filing positions are the same -- in every news article they link to PDFs of their filings, and it's available via the FCC ECFS to the general public, so I'm not sure how they could pull off such a ruse as you would suggest.  It's foolhardy to think ARRL management would spend money on lawyers not representing core ARRL positions on issues when there's thousands of dues-paying members that read all their filings.  Again, please quote something from an ARRL filing that supports your statement, otherwise I call you-know-what :-)<br><br><div class="bquote">BTW, UTP telephone wring is not perfectly balanced, and radiates some as well.  With the rollout of VDSL expecially, there was concern about harmful interference in the HF band.  Unlike much of the BPL community, however, the DSL community took up the issue head-on, and did technical analyses and field measurements that ulimately resulted in the ham bands being notched out of the VDSL spectrum.  Leaky coax cable systems are also frequently an issue.</DIV>Agreed, but UTP wiring and even leaky cable systems are much better off with regards to radiation that BPL can ever be.<br><br><div class="bquote">Bottom line is that it's too bad that these idiot BPL operators in Virginia decided to try to use PR rather than engineering to deal with the issue, and ended up giving all BPL a bad name.  It's too bad that the BPL technology supplier used for most of the BPL trials in the U.S. also didn't care about interference.  But if you look at Cincinnati, where Current Technologies has been operating for quite some time, hams are OK, airplanes aren't falling out of the sky, and emergency communications services work just fine.  So apparently there is a technical solution to these issues, if the willingness to implement it is there, along with the required engineering expertice.<br> </DIV>I agree this can be made to work, although it's somewhat of a false solution.  Someone's spectrum is getting trashed when a BPL system is in operation.  Notching just moves it away from the squeaky wheel.  Manassas isn't the first system to give BPL a bad name, though it's the most recent.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16328186</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:50:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Somebody in high places got pissed.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16328036</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/414930"><b>Transmaster</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  GhostFreeman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1019087"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Dig deep and i'm sure AT&T is involved, like that other market they managed to get shut down.<br> </DIV>That was just one of the things I was thinking about. except for the fact none of the big providers thing BPL is in anyway a viable threat to their business.<br><SMALL>--<br>The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16328036</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:22:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Somebody in high places got pissed.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327965</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  GhostFreeman <A HREF="/useremail/u/1019087"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><BR><BR>Dig deep and i'm sure AT&T is involved, like that other market they managed to get shut down.<br> </DIV>Why would AT&T even care?  This is residential Internet service.  AT&T actually played around with BPL two or three years ago in California and pulled out due to business reasons.<br><br>Edit: AT&T also funded the Penn State BPL study from two years ago.  This was the study that determined BPL could do 1 Gbps under "ideal" conditions.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327965</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:08:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/908026"><b>PDXPLT</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  rf_engineer <A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>BPL has no wireless spectrum to stay in - it's a wired network therefore it has no frequency allocations....just like cable and DSL which deliver broadband just fine without wrecking spectrum.<br> </DIV>Well, that's close but not <I>quite</I> true.  Licensed services in a portion of spectrum have primary allocations or secondary allocations, but they are rarely exclusive (some of the radio astronomy bands probably being the only ones).  Licensed-exempt users under Part 15 are the bottom of the totem pole, but they are explicitly permitted under Part 15 to radiate RF power in certain bands as an intentional, unintentional, or incidental radiator.  This can even lead to some degree of interference, so long as such interference does not lead to the level of "harmful" (that's why those electric drills can remain on the market), and in addition, the license-exempt user must accept harmful interference from any source.<br><br>I know ARRL lawyers disagree with this portion of the law, and argue in nearly all of their filings with the FCC that the Commission has no authority to authorize Part 15 operation in the first place.  But they've been trying for over 25 years to win that point, and haven't done so yet (I suppose that's why the position the ARRL takes in press releases to the public and their membership is a much more reasonable one than this official position they take in the FCC filings.  Or maybe they have no idea what their lawyers are doing).<br><br>BTW, UTP telephone wring is not perfectly balanced, and radiates some as well.  With the rollout of VDSL expecially, there was concern about harmful interference in the HF band.  Unlike much of the BPL community, however, the DSL community took up the issue head-on, and did technical analyses and field measurements that ulimately resulted in the ham bands being notched out of the VDSL spectrum.  Leaky coax cable systems are also frequently an issue.<br><br>Bottom line is that it's too bad that these idiot BPL operators in Virginia decided to try to use PR rather than engineering to deal with the issue, and ended up giving all BPL a bad name.  It's too bad that the BPL technology supplier used for most of the BPL trials in the U.S. also didn't care about interference.  But if you look at Cincinnati, where Current Technologies has been operating for quite some time, hams are OK, airplanes aren't falling out of the sky, and emergency communications services work just fine.  So apparently there is a technical solution to these issues, if the willingness to implement it is there, along with the required engineering expertice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327387</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:56:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Somebody in high places got pissed.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1019087"><b>GhostFreeman</b></A> : Dig deep and i'm sure AT&T is involved, like that other market they managed to get shut down.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16327352</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:47:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16326042</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897844"><b>N3OGH</b></A> : Don't do that in Pennsylvania, you may be the one who gets the ticket...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16326042</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:09:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Somebody in high places got pissed.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16326000</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Overwhelming complaints from everyone operating below 50 MHz, I'd bet.  The process takes a long time sometimes.<br><SMALL>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16326000</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 13:01:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Somebody in high places got pissed.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16325662</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/414930"><b>Transmaster</b></A> : What I am wondering is what behind the scenes thing happened to make the FCC finally move to at last enforce the rules on this issue.<br><SMALL>--<br>The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16325662</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 11:50:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324390</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Give me your plate number, because I'd love to slam you against the barrier on the Dan Ryan. What an idiotic post.<br><br>What are you, 15?<br><SMALL>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324390</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:57:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324366</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/705588"><b>91439306</b></A> : This doesn't work in CT. The speed limit is 40 on rt 66  in Middlefield. Because it's a double lane highway, people ususally do 60 on that road. The police just tag the cars that match 'the color of the day'. Each day, they start out and pick a new random color. If silver is the color of the day, and you're driving a silver Nissan, you're it, if you're following traffic that's traveling over the limit.<br>Just because 99% of the drivers on the road at the time are violating the law doesn't make it okay to do so.<br><SMALL>--<br>Take care,<BR><br><BR><br>Mark & Mary Ann Weiss<BR><br><BR><br>My Kurzweil Music at: '&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dv-clips.com/theater.htm" >www.dv-clips.com/theater.htm</A><BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.basspig.com" >www.basspig.com</A> Bass Pig's Lair<BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mwcomms.com" >www.mwcomms.com</A><BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.adventuresinanimemusic.com" >www.adventuresinanimemusic.com</A> Stereo Feed!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324366</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:49:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324325</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/705588"><b>91439306</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I bet if you did a survey not a single one needed a HAM other than to "chit chat".  Or if they did use it for something it could of been done easier with a cell phone.<br> </DIV>Cellular calls are private, point to point communications. HAM radio has the advantage that anyone can listen, and any licensed HAM can 'drop in' and participate in the discussion. It's a great way to meet people and make new friends. Think of it as a verbal form of internet forum.<br><SMALL>--<br>Take care,<BR><br><BR><br>Mark & Mary Ann Weiss<BR><br><BR><br>My Kurzweil Music at: '&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.dv-clips.com/theater.htm" >www.dv-clips.com/theater.htm</A><BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.basspig.com" >www.basspig.com</A> Bass Pig's Lair<BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.mwcomms.com" >www.mwcomms.com</A><BR><br>'&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.adventuresinanimemusic.com" >www.adventuresinanimemusic.com</A> Stereo Feed!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16324325</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 01:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323780</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/466028"><b>RayW</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MysticGogeta <A HREF="/useremail/u/1173562"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>They might call a EPA the ham operators are an endangered species  :D<br> </DIV>(I assume you are being sarcastic to the "head in the sand" people, but....)<br><br>Not really. My 13 year old just got her license.  And in the same test session three other kids ranging from 13 to 15 did the same. Out of 24 taking the test, 19 passed and now have licenses to operate as 'hams'.<br><br>Of course there were about five or six others who decided <B>NOT</B> to take the test once they learned it was not like CB and there were enforced legal ramifications for incorrect usage.<br><br>Isn't it amazing that every time someone mentions BPL, how the same people say 'who needs hams' and bring out the same   physics challenged, geographically challenged, and blind views? Thus sidetracking the original thread ...ummm... about 75% of the postings at least?  Must be nice to live in a cocoon where nothing goes wrong and the only reality is a computer.<br><SMALL>--<br>I am not lost, I find myself every time.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323780</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:26:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323645</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/763311"><b>The Folsom</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>Clearly, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about... You really should go to your clue locker and pick one. What do YOU care what happens in Manassas? You don't even live there. You just want to sow hate and discontent because you either hate hams or you have nothing of any real substance to contribute. As long as this issue has been in play on this site, you have done nothing but slam hams. Give it a rest already.<br><SMALL>--<br>Who is "Roger?", and why is everybody saying his name on the radio?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323645</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 23:00:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323485</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/577421"><b>jeffhambone</b></A> : In light of the continuing arguments over BPL vs. ham radio, I propose a new <A HREF="http://www.wemsi.org/qsigs.html">Q signal</A> for us hams to use where appropriate:  <B>QPK</B><br><br>As with other Q signals, QPK has a question form and and a corresponding answer form:<br><br>QPK? -- Shall I plonk you (or <I>poster's name</I>)?<br>QPK -- I have plonked you (or <I>poster's name</I>).<br><br>Other BPL-related Q signals may become necessary, depending on the nature of the discussion.<br><SMALL>--<br>Son, there's only one thing you need to know:  HEMI</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323485</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:28:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  RayW <A HREF="/useremail/u/466028"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by K9ERG :</SMALL><br><br>Imagine you are in a life boat in the middle of the North Atlantic and you have a 25 Watt HF radio with which you should be able to communicate with shore stations. <br> </DIV>Ah....everyone knows you would just pull out your cell phone and since no one else is around to interfere you can reach all the way to the next cell tower. Besides, modern vessels do not sink. *innocent look*<br><br> </DIV>NO NO NO!!!!! You need to whip out you extremely expensive sat phone and pay a few dollars a minute to get help.  :D :D :D :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323375</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:07:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323337</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I bet if you did a survey not a single one needed a HAM other than to "chit chat".  Or if they did use it for something it could of been done easier with a cell phone.<br> </DIV>Survey says, "You have no clue what you are talking about." <br><br>Ask the people about cell phones during Katrina.  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323337</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 22:01:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>There are enough HAMs in Manassas to report all the spectrum pollution that comes from that BPL deployment.<br><br>As for common sence, go read the Code of Federal Regulations before you start spouting off what you know NOTHING about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323314</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:57:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323294</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  grcore <A HREF="/useremail/u/909330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Trolling would be me saying "HAMS suck, wish they would all disappear".  I know HAMs are use full, but not in USA anymore (minus Alaska and Hawaii perhaps). </DIV>Is that the best you can do?  Or is your writer on strike?<br><br>Give it one more try, and put some thought into it this time..<br> </DIV>You are asking too much of him.  :D<br><br>First rule of trolling is to have at least a valid argument to enrage someone with.  ;)  Ask him about how Europe uses DC power instead of AC like here in the US.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323294</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:55:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323250</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  driscollw80 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1248311"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Bottom line, stay in your spectum. What would happen if Ham screwed up BPL ? <br> </DIV>Ironically, nothing.  BPL is a FCC Part 15 device that has to accept any interference from any source.  This would include CBs or someone's power drill pushing noise spikes back down the power line.  BPL has no wireless spectrum to stay in - it's a wired network therefore it has no frequency allocations....just like cable and DSL which deliver broadband just fine without wrecking spectrum.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323250</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:47:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/148605"><b>pvale</b></A> : It doesn't matter, even if we were tiddly-wink flippers. We are LICENSED users of the spectrum, and as such, the unlicensed services need to protect the licensed user from interference. And we were here first. And all of your BPL systems are UNLICENSED Part 15 devices. To those who say ham radio is irrelevant, we have totally separate infrastructure that will let me send a message across the country on my own power to a similarly equipped ham. Homeland Security takes us seriously, including funding training for those who want to take it to be trained to government communicator standards. If my home station, which has 3 days of backup power, becomes untenable, I can have my equipment in the field, hooked up and operating inside of an hour. We take public service seriously.<br><br>Cheers<br>Perry Vale Extra-class Amateur Radio Operator N0MXJ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323228</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:42:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323139</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1327083"><b>enkid</b></A> : K9ERG is right - the problem is global. Perhaps a more realistic lifeboat example would be if the radio propagation from the Manassas area to your lifeboat is really good; the interference would make it more difficult for you to communicate with anyone, anywhere, from the lifeboat.  Now add a few more BPL systems in other cities - they'd pretty much blanket the entire planet with radio noise, making it more difficult for anyone to communicate via HF radio.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323139</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:32:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323006</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1248311"><b>driscollw80</b></A> : Bottom line, stay in your spectum. What would happen if Ham screwed up BPL ? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16323006</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 21:11:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379790"><b>phattieg</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>Obviously more than you estimated.  Either that, or an FCC ham operator got tired of the noise floor due to this poor attempt of the power company trying to offer broadband.  Either way, the evidence is there, the interference exists, and despite what argument or flamer posts in this forum, the public, including the FCC agree, the power company is in violation of the intended agreement with the FCC.  Hams were here first, regardless of what you think of them.  They are the ones who invested in sensitive radio equipment so they could communicate long distances, not a major company.  They deserve a voice, and the respect of compliance, since they would be under fire if they did not comply with their FCC/Ham licenses.  I think this is fair, and it's about time a half assed operation got shut down for causing drama in a spectrum that does not cause harm back.  The BPL provider should fix the issue, and re-deploy the right equipment.  With that said, tell me whats so wrong with that idea.  Forget the fact that you think ham is outdated, keep in mind the fact that this technology was not designed to use the frequency its negatively affecting, and so therefore it's flawed.  Since ham came first, the BPL operator is knowingly violating the law by causing interference on Ham spectrum.  It's like me parking my car in your driveway, out of your vehicles way.  It would still piss you off I was parked there, because it's your driveway, not mine, and I have no right to invade your space if I don't have your permission.  The reality of it all is it boils down to ethics.  The power company is just trying to make a buck off the misery of others.  Ham equipment is definately nowhere near cheap, so I'd be pissed too.<br><SMALL>--<br>SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322922</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:59:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322793</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/408904"><b>caddyroger</b></A> : You do not speed to keep up with the other cars. Just take this if you are going 85 in a 70 mph zone and you cause an accident who going to get the ticket. who could be sued. Not the other drivers you will be. It still against the law ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322793</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:26:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322773</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173562"><b>MysticGogeta</b></A> : They might call a EPA the ham operators are an endangered species  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322773</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:20:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322712</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/466028"><b>RayW</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by K9ERG :</SMALL><br><br>Imagine you are in a life boat in the middle of the North Atlantic and you have a 25 Watt HF radio with which you should be able to communicate with shore stations. <br> </DIV>Ah....everyone knows you would just pull out your cell phone and since no one else is around to interfere you can reach all the way to the next cell tower. Besides, modern vessels do not sink. *innocent look*<br><br>DISCLAIMER: I am a licensed radio operator, an emergency communications specialist for my (neighborhood, parish, ward, district, or whatever name you use), member of the Ogden Sheriffs Commo Team and the Davis Emergency Communications Team, and in the past four years a witness to several activations of Ham radio both in the BPL band and outside of it when all other communications failed or were not usable.  Yeah, I am prejudiced towards the value of radio over BPL, radio is used more often than many people realize.<br><SMALL>--<br>I am not lost, I find myself every time.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322712</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 20:05:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1053031"><b>smcallah</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  ropeguru <A HREF="/useremail/u/295948"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>And to add to that, suppose there is an emergency somewhere other than Manasas,  but it is the Amateur Radio people in Manassas that they need to communicate with. Then there wuld be issues. <br> </DIV>The amateur radio operators in Manassas will certainly be able to save them!<br><br>Super Manassas Amateur Radio operators to the rescue!  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322536</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:27:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/295948"><b>ropeguru</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  David95037 <A HREF="/useremail/u/799805"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  zod5000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/889530"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><br><br>If there were a big disaster, one would think the power would get knocked out, and the interference would stop, but <br> </DIV>Q: If the power goes out in an area, BPL interference will go out as well, so Hams could then provide emergency services, so what is the problem? <br><br>A: Amateurs need to maintain equipment and practice needed skills before a disaster occurs. If the equipment is unusable during regular times, what is the motivation even to buy equipment? Another thing to consider is that emergency stations need to be able to communicate out to areas that do have power.<br><br>From the BPL FAQ;<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html#21" >www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html#21</A><br> </DIV>And to add to that, suppose there is an emergency somewhere other than Manasas,  but it is the Amateur Radio people in Manassas that they need to communicate with. Then there wuld be issues. <br><br>These people that cannot see the entire picture need to go educate themselves before before posting garbage.<br><SMALL>--<br>FWD#: 223611</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322473</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:18:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322321</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : You fail to realize that radio is a HOBBY for these people. It is not a "cell phone." Far from it.... Show me a cell phone that can talk from New York to Sydney Australia, or to the middle of China or Siberia for FREE and I'll give you a cookie. <br><br>There is a lot more to ham radio than you think. The majority of the hobby today is high tech and no longer "AM radio."<br>Earth-Moon-Earth, Packet Radio (the ORIGINAL technology digital cell phone is based on) etc... If it wasn't for hams, those "cell phones" wouldn't be as small as they are today. A lot of experimentation and SUPPORT in times of need when everything else is down comes from hams. Ask any first responder, or the department of homeland security, FEMA, etc and they will tell you. Ham Radio ARES (Amateur Radio Emergency Services and RACES Radio Amateur Civil Emergency Service are connected directly to municipal/state/federal agencies. Ever hear of MARS? Military Amateur Radio Service? Amateur Radio operators are given permission to operate on Military frequencies and participate in drills and help the military when asked upon.<br><br>I myself participate in 4 daily "traffic" nets for emergency preparedness across New York and New Jersey and a weekly Skywarn net for severe weather preparedation. I spend countless hours "helping" my community. Maybe you don't see it with your eyes, but when I am needed, I'll be ready. Just like you don't respect the Emergency Squad who will save your life if you had a heart attack until you actually need them. <br><br>Take care,<br><br>A Computer and Radio Geek,<br><br>-Tzale]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16322321</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:42:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321951</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/909330"><b>grcore</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Trolling would be me saying "HAMS suck, wish they would all disappear".  I know HAMs are use full, but not in USA anymore (minus Alaska and Hawaii perhaps). </DIV>Is that the best you can do?  Or is your writer on strike?<br><br>Give it one more try, and put some thought into it this time..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321951</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 17:20:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321783</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/718668"><b>Slidetbone</b></A> : Chit-chat? Get real!<br><br>You may not know it, but HAM operators are all over the USA, Canada...worldwide!<br><br>When the NY blackout happened, it was amateur radio that took over. When Katrina hit Louisiana and Mississippi, HAM radio was in full force.<br><br>Reliability of a HAM radio depends on the rig, the antenna and/or access to repeaters. In all cases, these rigs put out more wattage than the 0.6 watt cellphone. And when the power is out, no celltower, no cell coverage. Go to a remote site and see what gets used in normal and emergency communications.<br><br>HAM will never die! Just hope you do not need to depend on a HAM operator in your lifetime. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321783</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:46:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/624862"><b>kws7114</b></A> : From a brief online search, there appears to be well over 150 hams in Manassas. It isn't how many complain, but how long a company can ignore the regulations to cooperate by not interfering with hams. The FCC finally saw that ComTek was stonewalling the obvious and now has less than 20 days to fix it or have thew FCC shut them down. How embarrassing for a local power company and anyone supporting BPL adaptation.<BR><BR>And fortunately - hams will help no matter how much we get heckled about our hobby. Don't knock it til you've at least talked to a ham and let them show you the hobby and potential for service. :-)<BR><BR>June 20 is Kids Day. Local hams have their station(s) available to kids to talk to other kids for a day.<BR><BR>What other form of communications allows entire schools to participate in talking to the crews on the International Space Station, giving kids a real feel for what space is like. Its time for kids to dream and follow their dreams. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321691</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:29:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1092926"><b>Rogers1</b></A> : I prefer the Term Geek]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321686</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:28:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321615</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/575131"><b>GadgetsRme</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Obliteration <A HREF="/useremail/u/1264302"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by N4QX  :</SMALL><br><br>When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.<br> </DIV>Ummm.... what damn driving school did you attend? My book states what mark stated before. If traffic is going on a road at 45mph and the speed limit is 35mph you are SUPPOSE to speed up to match flow of traffic. Since the traffic will be constantly try to pass you, you will likely end up causing an accident due to the fact that you are disrupting flow of traffic.<br>When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.<br>This was stated by my driving teacher, a POLICE CHIEF who visited during my driving class, and the damn driving rule book.<br> </DIV>Besides repairing computers I'm a driving instructor, trained and supervised by a nationally certified driving instructor. I had to take 35 hours of classroom instruction and pass with a 92. Ater that I drove 48 hrs with the senior instructor before he would turn me loose by myself with students. I further took the class and received certification by the Compliance Section, Division of Motor Vehicle, State of Colorado to administer the Colo. State Basic Skills Operator Test. That all said, mike52, I call "Bullshit".<br><SMALL>--<br>Gadgets</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321615</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:14:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321554</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/430158"><b>MacLeech</b></A> : As a cable system maintenance tech, one of my duties is to fight ingress into the system... along with fixing egress (leak) sources.<br><br>Its a full time job.<br><br>The system isn't perfectly shielded. So some stuff ALWAYS gets in and its much harder to find those then the RF unintentionally leaking out.<br><br>FCC requires cable companies to search for, log, and fix any leaks (egress). Ingress isn't controlled by the FCC and most cable companies only look for it when it becomes an issue. So there are lots of minor ingress sources that never get fixed.<br><br>Usually its from point sources like breaks in the cable, bad equipment connected to the system (aka cheap TVs, VCRs, TV tuner cards, etc...), or radio transmitters overwhelming the shielding in some locations.<br><br>Imagine what would happen with a RF source a few feet away from the cable across the most of the cable distribution system... EVERY weak spot will become an ingress source. It'd be ingress WAY beyond the random stuff affecting most cable systems now...<br><br>...right in the frequency range used by ALL upstream communications on a cable system.<br><br>Cable modems, VOD, interactive cable services of all types would be affected.<br><SMALL>--<br>For official Adelphia support, contact Adelphia. I'm just here for advice...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321554</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 16:00:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : It is not a problem confined to the immediate Manassas VA area. The problem is <B>GLOBAL</B>.<br><br>Imagine you are in a life boat in the middle of the North Atlantic and you have a 25 Watt HF radio with which you should be able to communicate with shore stations. Assume that conditions are such that the only shore stations that would hear you are in Manassas VA. The ~6.25 micro-volt signal you would produce into the receiver in Manassas would be wiped out by the 500 micro-volts of garbage radiated 24/7 by the ComTek BPL system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321179</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:24:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321391</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1318502"><b>ARGONAUT</b></A> : The HAMs use public air waves and a privet company is disrupting public waves...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321391</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:22:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321374</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Slacker44 <A HREF="/useremail/u/387771"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Do they speak in plain english or do I have to learn some sort of underground nerd speak?  <br> </DIV>I've never heard nerd speak here on BBR  :uhh:<br><br>Broadband nerds, computer nerds, radio nerds, electronics nerds.... whatever nerd discipline, we're all NERDS...! :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321374</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:19:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321359</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  MacLeech <A HREF="/useremail/u/430158"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>You do realize that your Charter cable modem service (like all DOCSIS cable networks) upstream connection runs in the same frequency range that the BPL systems do... don't you?<br><br>Cable lines run parallel to electric lines for miles just a few feet away.... so the possibility of interference is huge.<br><br>If such a BPL system were lit up in your area, more then likely your cable modem service would go down or be unreliable.... for weeks or months...<br> </DIV>Not necessarily.  There's a key difference between BPL and cable.  Cable is shielded, BPL is not.  If Cable had the same radiation characteristics as BPL, it would wreck all the spectrum from HF to UHF and take out just about everything.  But cable has been using these same frequencies for years with nearly no problems to wireless licensees due to the shielding and strict radiation guidelines.  This is what makes BPL such a bad choice, they're attempting to create a really bad leaky cable system, and minimize the damage to spectrum by using only HF and VHF frequencies, and when that doesn't work, deny there's issues in press releases.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321359</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:15:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321343</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>"But the law says the BPL system (unlicensed Part 15) can't interfere with any licensed services. Common sense would dictate that they need to follow their own laws. Sounds like you need a dose of common sense."<br><br>Common sense would make lots of laws obsolete. Its not a matter if its a law now, its a matter of its a right law.  Law says you must obey the speed limit, common sense says if every car is going past you at 85 when speed limit is 70 you speed up regardless of law. <br> </DIV>Your "common sense" isn't sense at all.  Raising the speed limit at some point gets more people killed.  If you raise the speed limit to 85, then people go 95.<br><br>Common sense and sane engineering practice would tell one that a <I>wired</I> network shouldn't interfere with <I>wireless</I> spectrum.  Cable, fiber, DSL, and T1/DS-3 facilities all carry as much or more information that BPL yet none of them radiate any or a significant amount of RF radiation.  Why should BPL be any different and be allowed to wreck a natural resource that allows worldwide communications, and delivers less than existing broadband solutions.  The FCC laws regarding interference aren't obsolete.  It's what makes your cell phone work, allows emergency responder communications to function, your TV and FM radio work, and several other services.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321343</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 15:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/430158"><b>MacLeech</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>You do realize that your Charter cable modem service (like all DOCSIS cable networks) upstream connection runs in the same frequency range that the BPL systems do... don't you?<br><br>Cable lines run parallel to electric lines for miles just a few feet away.... so the possibility of interference is huge.<br><br>If such a BPL system were lit up in your area, more then likely your cable modem service would go down or be unreliable.... for weeks or months...<br><SMALL>--<br>For official Adelphia support, contact Adelphia. I'm just here for advice...</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321277</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:58:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321275</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1264302"><b>Obliteration</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by N4QX :</SMALL><BR><BR>When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.<br> </DIV>Ummm.... what damn driving school did you attend? My book states what mark stated before. If traffic is going on a road at 45mph and the speed limit is 35mph you are SUPPOSE to speed up to match flow of traffic. Since the traffic will be constantly try to pass you, you will likely end up causing an accident due to the fact that you are disrupting flow of traffic.<br><br>This was stated by my driving teacher, a POLICE CHIEF who visited during my driving class, and the damn driving rule book.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321275</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:58:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321189</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641559"><b>bigskank</b></A> : With all due respect markopoleo, your argument of "its not a matter if its a law now" is rather silly.  Who decides what a "right law" is in a case like this?  Obviously there are two widely differering groups having an opinion about what the right law is here; the hams feel that interference should be illegal because why should BPL have rights to pollute the specturm.  ComTek feels it should be able to do so, and that the hams are holding back technology.  Arguing which law is "right" is always based on a particular person's viewpoint; there is no objective standard here.  As such, since there is a law in place, it ought be enforced.  If BPL providers can convince the FCC to change regs to allow BPL to pollute the ham's spectrum, then fine.  Until then, it should be enforced as it is.<br><br>As a similar analogy, what if BPL polluted the spectrum carrying the emergency broadcast system signals?  Or the atomic clock signals?  Both are used by a relatively small portion of the population, but both have their proper uses in times of emergency and/or specialized business applications.  Is it "right" for one technology such as BPL (also used by a relatively small portion of the population) to hinder other technologies?  This isn't a question of competition (BPL and Ham's aren't directly competing against each other in the business sense, such as cable and dsl do).  This is one where technology that has been poorly implemented (in that it violates current laws) in such a way that it damages the activities of another group of citizens. <br><br>So I ask, how is the law in this case "wrong"?  What gives BPL the right to pollute spectrum to the detriment of a group of citizens with equal right to pursue their own communication methods?  Why should BPL not have to play by the same anti-interference rules that cable, dsl, satellite, hams, and every other electronic device in the US must play by?  What makes BPL so different that many people think it can interfere with other licensed communication methods other than the fact that some people prefer BPL over hams?  I'm not trying to troll here [which I guess is like starting a statement saying "I'm not a racist, but..."], I'm just really wanting to know why so many people feel that BPL should have a more preferential status than other electronics and communication methods in this country?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321189</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:42:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321081</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : When I prosecuted traffic tickets, we loved uping the charges against clowns who used this logic to Reckless Driving.  We took a lot of folks who needed to be off the road off the road that way.<br><br>COMTek needs to be off the road.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321081</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/224820"><b>Jigsaw</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>How is that trolling? Its just stating what everyone is thinking.  <br> </DIV>I'll do my own thinking thanks!!!! :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br> &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.auralmoon.com/html/" >www.auralmoon.com/html/</A> Stimulating ears for 6 years</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321148</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:32:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321053</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><b>markopoleo</b></A> : How is that trolling? Its just stating what everyone is thinking.  Trolling would be me saying "HAMS suck, wish they would all disappear".  I know HAMs are use full, but not in USA anymore (minus Alaska and Hawaii perhaps).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321053</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:08:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321044</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><b>markopoleo</b></A> : I bet if you did a survey not a single one needed a HAM other than to "chit chat".  Or if they did use it for something it could of been done easier with a cell phone.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321044</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:06:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><b>markopoleo</b></A> : "But the law says the BPL system (unlicensed Part 15) can't interfere with any licensed services. Common sense would dictate that they need to follow their own laws. Sounds like you need a dose of common sense."<br><br>Common sense would make lots of laws obsolete. Its not a matter if its a law now, its a matter of its a right law.  Law says you must obey the speed limit, common sense says if every car is going past you at 85 when speed limit is 70 you speed up regardless of law. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16321037</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:04:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320886</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1148403"><b>Michieru2</b></A> : In order to be a HAM operator you must have your license to do so. Same as GMRS radio.<br><br>What you say is nerd talk, is plain english for people who understand. or are you basically saying if someone was talking to you in japanese and you did not understand would that consitute as nerd talk? Or simply your plain ignorance?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320886</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:34:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320815</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/853568"><b>rf_engineer</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..</DIV>Not an ISP, a BPL network.  Comtek messed up when their own measurement reports shown they were above the emissions limit.  The emissions limit doesn't really involve hams and is independent of the harmful interference language in Part 15.<br><br><div class="bquote">Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>But the law says the BPL system (unlicensed Part 15) can't interfere with any licensed services.  Common sense would dictate that they need to follow their own laws.  Sounds like you need a dose of common sense.<br><br>Too bad you put so much energy into your trolling and can't support any of your past nonsensical posts like this one with facts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320815</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:20:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320762</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/387771"><b>Slacker44</b></A> : Do they speak in plain english or do I have to learn some sort of underground nerd speak?  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320762</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:09:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : There are 343 records matching +manassas,* +va*<br><br>AA0ZN &#9;AUTH MATTHEW R 12794 Forest Oak Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>AC4OM &#9;ZBOROFSKY RICHARD A 8200 MARY JANE DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>AC4YG &#9;HOUSDEN SR ROBERT J 7832 MANASSAS DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>AC6JN &#9;LATHAM ROY N 8203 Meadowlark Court Manassas VA 20111<br>AE4EA &#9;DE LAGE STEVEN B 9357 RIVER CREST RD MANASSAS VA 20110<br>AE4UM &#9;Whalen Catherine A 7812 Lake Dr Manassas VA 20111<br>AF4MF &#9;BOWDEN RICHARD V 7941 COMMUNITY DR MANASSAS VA 20109<br>AJ4E &#9;HAWKINS GEORGE P 9501 NATCHEZ TRAIL CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>K3PZM &#9;SILVER FRANK 9430 ROBIN LEE CT MANASSAS VA 20111<br>K3TRM &#9;AIELLO FRANK A 7600 Burnt Tree Drive Manassas VA 20111<br>K4FHN &#9;BRUNIGER RONALD J 8130 BLANDSFORD DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>K4FKE &#9;HIDER JOHN D D 14119 WALTON DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>K4HJF &#9;ZAEPFEL ROBERT P 9026 LONGSTREET DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>K4JLZ &#9;PAOLUCCI UMBERTO 9318 STUART AVE MANASSAS VA 22110<br>K4MLA &#9;Reynolds Laurence J 12536 Basswood Dr Manassas VA 22111<br>K4RSU &#9;Zachry Jr Charles C 5757 White Flint Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>K6SLK &#9;Tatum Timothy C 8571 Richmond Ave Manassas VA 20110<br>K9OYD &#9;VOSS ROBERT S 12255 RUSTIC WOOD CT MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KA0BTP &#9;KLAFFENBACH JOHN C 9068 SILVER MAPLE CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KA0KKP &#9;DE LA HUNT EDWARD P 9531 JUSTIN LN MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KA1UG &#9;FOLEY JOHN J 7759 LONG CREEK CT MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KA3DCG &#9;MILES WILLIAM C PO BOX 1663 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KA3ZPF &#9;OLIVER ROBIN M 7993 FLAGER CIRCLE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KA4AFU &#9;Watts Tommy E 2827 Signal Hill Rd Manassas VA 20111<br>KA4AJH &#9;VIERS DARRELL L 8981 WESTCHESTER DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KA4ANF &#9;KUC FRANCIS D 7819 GARNER DR MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KA4KAY &#9;Shrout Iii Roy B 10502 Fairweather Court Manassas VA 20112<br>KA4NES &#9;KELLY III ROBERT R 7700 ANDERSON CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KA4SCA &#9;MILLER BERNICE C PO BOX 1566 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KA4UII &#9;STARLIPER PAUL W 9814 FAIRMONT AVE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KA4VYT &#9;PRINGLE WILLIAM B 7828 GARNER DR MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KA4YDD &#9;DUDA GEORGE F 9901 HYNSON DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KA8VTN &#9;GROVE THOMAS V 8471 IVY GLEN CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KB0HSA &#9;LAMB JAMES R 8329 IRONGATE WAY MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KB1AAY &#9;CANYON STEVE M 11084 WAINWRIGHT PL MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KB2KB &#9;STAPLES ARTHUR W 9540 Allegro Drive Manassas VA 20112<br>KB2LEB &#9;BULTMAN TIMOTHY J PO BOX 1971 MANASSAS VA 20108<br>KB4BHB &#9;Dugas Alfred P 8252 Wellington Rd Manassas VA 21019<br>KB4EFP &#9;BLASDELL MARY L 9727 LOUDOUN AVE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KB4ERD &#9;HENSON DAVID L 7800 TAYLOR DR LOT 83 MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KB4GCR &#9;PERKINS CHARLES H 7521 WHITEHALL DR MANASSAS VA 22001<br>KB4MKL &#9;Fischer Jeffrey L 8529 Oakview Drive Manassas VA 20110<br>KB4MKM &#9;TWEEDEN JACK O 10617 DUMFRIES RD MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KB4MOW &#9;BAHR KURTIS R 9125 DOVES LN MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KB4OF &#9;MEADE STEPHEN A PO BOX 1418 MANASSAS VA 20108<br>KB4RKL &#9;BLASDELL BLAINE E 9727 LOUDOUN AVE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KB4RME &#9;STEKETEE PETER W 8783 PEABODY ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KB4WFL &#9;LINTON JEB R 8898 CENTER ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KB4ZMP &#9;ORTIZ OSCAR 8204 OAKGLEN RD MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KB5QZJ &#9;SMITH CHERI 11411 HUNTSMAN DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KB7KGU &#9;MONTGOMERY DENNIS A PO BOX 10464 MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KB8NUM &#9;MINKE SCOTT P 9669 ALLEGRO DRIVE MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KB8RZK &#9;MC ILWAIN DWIGHT D 8045 GRACIE DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KC4AHK &#9;LEDBETTER JERRY R 8006 WHITTING DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KC4IRL &#9;HAWLEY MICHAEL R 9246 BEAUREGARD AVE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KC4MEL &#9;MARTINEZ GERARD A 11030 Doubleday Lane Manassas VA 20109<br>KC4OLE &#9;STEKETEE AARON P 8783 PEABODY ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KC4OYD &#9;MEADE ANGIE M PO BOX 1418 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KC4RON &#9;Mc Whirt Jeffrey A 9337 Camphor Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KC4TNC &#9;Friend Robert G 9641 Austin Way Manassas VA 20110<br>KC4VDN &#9;MC KEEVER II ROBERT G 8725 DeBlanc Place Manassas VA 20110<br>KC4VPR &#9;TONOLETE MARCO A 10260 GREYSTONE RD MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KC5DV &#9;ERLACHER TERRY L 10337 Gent Court Manassas VA 20110<br>KC5DWL &#9;KIRKLAND II ARTHUR A 8877Oliver Court 2 Manassas VA 20110<br>AC4PL &#9;Colling Philip L 8061 Juliet Ln Apt 104 Manassas VA 20109<br>KD4DEE &#9;BRUCE DAVID A 9033 TRAVELLER ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KD4ECN &#9;BRUSH JR LEONARD M 9989 YELLOW WOOD COURT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KD4GTN &#9;FLANAGAN GEORGE 10516 MANOR VIEW PL MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KD4KBX &#9;MASSIE RICHARD A 9844 S CLARK PL MANASSAS VA 20110<br>K4ATP &#9;McClain Robert J 7790 Fern Oak Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>KD4RGY &#9;KORICH DEBORA C 10253 BROOKSTONE CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KD4RHB &#9;AHALT FREDERICK A 9213 PEABODY ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KD4RHC &#9;Kiessling Gene F 7407 Sabin Dr Manassas VA 20109<br>KD4SIB &#9;ZBOROFSKY LINDA N 8200 MARY JANE DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KD4TQX &#9;PLITT JOSHUA D 9518 COVINGTON PL MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KD6CAK &#9;HODGES CHARLES C 8186 Peakwood CT APT 9 Manassas VA 20111<br>KE4BUY &#9;SMITH ROSS A 15129 ECLIPSE DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4CWA &#9;Lewis Martin A PO BOX 1435 Manassas VA 20108<br>KE4DXC &#9;WALCHER CHARLES W 8480 JACQUELINE AVE MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4EUC &#9;RAY CHARLES D 7260 YATES FORD RD MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KE4EVB &#9;SMITH PHILLIP T 15129 ECLIPSE DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4GKH &#9;Mc Mahon Brian S 9801 Copeland Dr Manassas VA 20109<br>KE4IDN &#9;BIRT PATRICK L 10828 STONE HILL LN MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KE4IDP &#9;BRINDLEY RUSSELL S 9717 KING GEORGE DR MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KE4KGS &#9;GRIMM NORMAN V 12752 BREN FOREST WAY MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4LWS &#9;SASAI RANDALL M 10327 BUTTERNUT CIRCLE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KE4MJL &#9;FUNKHOUSER JAMES J 9249 Jessica Drive MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>KE4OIK &#9;Rickerson Donald E 10317 Amberleigh Ct Manassas VA 22110<br>KE4PCV &#9;HATTON THOMAS E 10331 LEE MANOR DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KE4PCW &#9;SCHOOL FRANCIS 8512 ROLLING RD MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KE4PRS &#9;MALLOY JAMES E 10320 7TH REGIMENT DR 201 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KE4QMS &#9;MILLER JOHNNY L 9240 NIKI PL 101 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KE4RTI &#9;COLE GLENN A 7625 SHELLEY LN MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4TMW &#9;FRICK JANICE A 246 KENT DR MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>KE4ULM &#9;ALEXANDER THOMAS H 7343 SHERATON DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE4YXT &#9;BISSETT ALVIN G 13459 NATICK DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KE6PNZ &#9;DE LEON LARRY B 10270 WINDGATE CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KE6SLE &#9;Latham Eileen M 8203 Meadowlark Court Manassas VA 20111<br>KF4BPG &#9;SCHOENBERG TIMOTHY R 9509 SUDLEY MANOR DR MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KF4EWL &#9;PATTERSON CHARLES J 6541 MOCKINGBIRD LN MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KF4FJB &#9;MC NAMARA KEITH E 8122 WEATHERWOOD CT 202 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KF4FJF &#9;ZINN CHARLES C 10157 STATESBORO CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KF4FOK &#9;PAIANI ROBERT J 8665 SUDLEY RD 352 Manassas VA 20110<br>KF4GTW &#9;TOWNSEND MICHAEL E 8878 Butternut Street MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4KKF &#9;PAWLAK DANIEL L 10379 SORRELL DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KF4LMA &#9;FOSTER CRAIG B 157 COLBURN DR MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>KF4NUI &#9;ADAMS PHILLIP G 6293 OCCOQUAN FOREST DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KF4OSL &#9;MC WHIRT ANN 9337 CAMPHOR CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4PIW &#9;ZUZA MARK J 8912 RUGBY RD MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KF4PQI &#9;NGUYEN VINH P 10112 TRINITY LN MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4QES &#9;BANEGAS HELMI H 8210 COMMUNITY DR MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KF4QQO &#9;CROCKER LAURA L 8021 LAKE DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KF4QQP &#9;JOHNSON JR WALLACE R 9789 FLINT ROCK RD MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KF4SJF &#9;NORTON WILLIAM F 8102 BLANDSFORD DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KF4TJH &#9;HARSHMAN BRADLEY J 8016 MACE CIR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KF4URX &#9;BRIOTTA WILLIAM A 8640 AMBROSE CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KF4WQO &#9;ELLERBRAKE DAVID G 9498 NINEBARK CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4WQP &#9;ELLERBRAKE LAURA M 9498 NINEBARK CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4YPX &#9;SCARTON ROBERT L 9405 Rosebud Court Manassas Park VA 20111<br>KF4YYE &#9;SANDFORD MARK J 8712 PARKLAND ST MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KF4YYF &#9;HATTON JENNIFER L 10331 LEE MANOR DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KF4YYG &#9;KING MICHAEL H 9103 FORT PL MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KG4CKK &#9;DICKINSON CHRISTOPHER C 8243 GIBBON PL MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KI4HE &#9;LEISS DAVID A 9002 WESTCHESTER DR MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KI4YM &#9;HARRIS JAMES B 11918 Millpond Ct MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KJ4LR &#9;MOSELEY CRAIG D 6365 Hemlock Ridge Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>KK4FL &#9;BANNISTER DAVID P 9581 COVINGTON PL MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KM4UH &#9;MOAN KENNETH L 12019 BRADLEY FOREST RD MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KM4US &#9;Moody Steven T 10375 Navarone Place Manassas VA 20110<br>KO4MF &#9;AUGUSTINE CAROL R 8620 Jackson Ave Manassas VA 20110<br>KS4AR &#9;SMITH BRADLEY P 15129 ECLIPSE DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KT3Y &#9;ALLARDICE PHILIP C 8516 CUSTER CT MANASSAS VA 22111<br>KT4DS &#9;WHALEN ERVIN E 7812 LAKE DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KU4WH &#9;FROCK RUTH A 9407 ROBIN LEE CT MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>N0DGN &#9;BETHMAN ROBERT 9268 BAYBERRY AVE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N0SVF &#9;ROBINSON AARON N 9346 GLOXINIA WAY MANASSAS VA 20110<br>W1CRO &#9;WHITTUM ARTHUR R PO BOX 1794 MANASSAS VA 20108<br>N1ZCY &#9;MARCHETTI JEFFREY C 11240 Lady Jane Loop 301 Manassas VA 20109<br>N2GJT &#9;GRIMSLEY JOHN B 9496 NINEBARK CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>N2JTA &#9;TARNOUSKY CHRISTOPHER G 8314 MORNINGSIDE DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N2UNE &#9;MAHONEY PAUL J 11300 Lady Jane Loop Apt 104 Manassas VA 20109<br>N2WND &#9;DE GROOT ALEX L 8158 Grand Court Manassas VA 20111<br>N3EXY &#9;WATTS ROGER D 9009 Yorkshire Ln Manassas VA 20111<br>N3GJG &#9;FEGELY HUGH D 10815 Gambril Dr 23 Manassas VA 20109<br>N3HF &#9;WOODRUFF MARK W 12472 SILENT WOLF DRIVE MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N3ODZ &#9;HAWK JAMES L 9189 LANDGREEN ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N4APU &#9;MARDEN LINDA M 7608 ORCHID CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4AZC &#9;AHALT JR HENRY C 9213 PEABODY ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N4BFI &#9;UZENOFF RONALD J 7805 GREGORY COURT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4DKL &#9;TRUNKLE DONALD J 10431 LAKE JACKSON DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>N4GLW &#9;MALLORY C WARREN 11180 POPLAR FORD TRAIL MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4HFW &#9;ROBERTS EUGENE W 11592 HICKS CT MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N4HOS &#9;Hennighausen Richard 14500 Idle Brook Ct Manassas VA 22111<br>N4KVS &#9;CARROLL DENNIS P 9281 BAYBERRY AVE MANASSAS VA 22110<br>N4KYI &#9;HALSTEAD ROBERT A 10376 SORRELL DR MANASSAS VA 22111<br>N4OGR &#9;Frick Stephen T 246 Kent Dr Manassas VA 20111<br>N4OML &#9;MOSELEY DEBORAH H 6365 HEMLOCK RIDGE CT MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N4OOM &#9;DE LAPP LLOYD E 12311 WHITE EAGLE DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N4PHG &#9;MC REYNOLDS ARNOLD R 8678 NAGLE ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N4PYJ &#9;HAMMACK DONALD C 7906 NORFOLK CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>N4PZI &#9;FREDERICK DAVID A 10163 CORYDALIS CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>N4QIT &#9;WYBORSKI NICHOLAS F J 9625 Branchview Ct Manassas VA 20011<br>N4RL &#9;MC CANN ROBERT J 9718 COPELAND DR MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4SN &#9;WARNOCK MILTON P 8214 CLAREMONT ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N4TJQ &#9;ZSCHACK JR HARRY M 9706 COPELAND DR MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4TMA &#9;STURGILL DONALD M 8280 VERNON ST MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N4WHV &#9;MC CARTY KAROL L 6498 MOCKINGBIRD LN MANASSAS VA 20111<br>N4WKW &#9;KRIPINSKI RICHARD W 307 OLD CENTREVILLE RD MANASSAS PARK VA 2211<br>N4XHO &#9;TARPLEE BRENDA S 9007 WESTCHESTER DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N4XSL &#9;WHITFIELD GEORGE P 8258 HIGHLAND MANASSAS VA 20110<br>N4XTQ &#9;PLUNKETT DANIEL P 7008 KODIAK CT MANASSAS VA 22111<br>N5GMQ &#9;BRIESKE CARL W 6038 PERSINGER HOUSE COURT MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N5RTY &#9;SMITH WESLEY C 11411 HUNTSMAN DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>N6GDX &#9;FORD JOSEPH L 7855 BROOKVIEW CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>N6NSM &#9;TONOLETE FERNANDO T 10260 GREYSTONE RD MANASSAS VA 22111<br>N8HOB &#9;Hoegstrom Paul W 6121 Occoquan Forest Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>N8RJE &#9;BRUCE DAVID V 8471 Ivy Glen Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>W0ACQ &#9;COTTON JOHN P 8409 BRIARMONT LN MANASSAS VA 20112<br>W1GQY &#9;HANSEN ARNE C 8126 COUNSELOR RD MANASSAS VA 22111<br>W3CIM &#9;DI GENNARO MYLES R 7003 Kings Forest Ln Manassas VA 20111<br>W3SZP &#9;BECKER CHARLES H 9515 HENSLEY RD MANASSAS VA 20112<br>W4GTL &#9;BLANCHARD JOHN L 8312 YORKSHIRE LN MANASSAS VA 20111<br>W4GZM &#9;YARBROUGH LEONARD S 10315 Abbot Road Manassas VA 20110<br>W4HJL &#9;BLASDELL DONALD W 9727 LOUDOUN AVE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>W4HYB &#9;SHUMAKER MAURICE J 7021 BRUIN CT MANASSAS VA 20111<br>W4ICX &#9;MAC KENZIE JOHN H 9602 PARK ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>W4LGB &#9;CHAREST ELDON E 8621 JACKSON AVE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>W4NF &#9;O MARA JOHN F 6913 TRUMPETER SWAN LN MANASSAS VA 20112<br>W4OVH &#9;OLE VIRGINIA HAMS AMATEUR RADIO CLUB INC PO BOX 1255 MANASSAS VA<br>W4OZO &#9;Brooks Sr Ralph W 8324 Rolling Rd Manassas VA 20110<br>W4PHX &#9;SINGLETON ROBERT F 8241 SUNSET DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>W4PR &#9;GILMAN STUART C 10500 MANOR VIEW PL MANASSAS VA 22110<br>W4PUD &#9;GLOR DAVID E 9422 WESTMORELAND AVE MANASSAS VA 22110<br>W4VUB &#9;TODD ALLEN P 9520 GEIST CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>W7KMA &#9;MOORE II THOMAS O 9521 GEIST CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA1FFX &#9;MURPHY CHARLES M 7705 STRASBURG ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WA1QQP &#9;FERGUSON ROBERT 10239 BETHANY CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA2GTT &#9;MC CORMICK ALAN W 8001 MC LEAN ST MANASSAS VA 20111<br>WA2ONG &#9;JEZIORO ANDREW M 10333 LEE MANOR DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA2PAT &#9;DEITZ FREDERICK S 8312 SHADY GROVE CIRCLE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA2QAL &#9;Podlesak Thomas F 9727 Lafayette Ave Manassas VA 20109<br>WA2ZRE &#9;SIRGANY WADIE N 9999 MARIAN DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>WA3RTS &#9;WARD ROGER L 8966 MERIT CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WA3UFY &#9;THOMSON JR RICHARD C 9808 BOTSFORD RD MANASSAS VA 20109<br>WA4DVV &#9;DOGGETT JOHN R 9205 CENTERVILLE RD MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA4FIC &#9;ELLIS WILLIAM S 8204 MACBETH ST MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WA4LCX &#9;FOOTE JOHN H 10542 KNOLLWOOD DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>WA4ODQ &#9;STEVENS PATRICIA J 8318 ROLLING RD MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA4QQT &#9;ROLLINS ALLEN T 9679 ALLEGRO DRIVE MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WA4RNW &#9;MAEYER DONALD C 6202 CHANDLER DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WA4VAC &#9;OUTLAND JOHN J 8210 SINCLAIR MILL RD MANASSAS VA 22111<br>WA4VRJ &#9;HOFFMAN JOSEPH A 9431 COREY DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WA4VTN &#9;BURTON RAYMOND V 8900 HILL PL MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WA4YGI &#9;DALE JR CHARLES J 9940 PORTSMOUTH RD MANASSAS VA 20109<br>WA4ZWN &#9;FRY JAMES J 10876 STONE HILL LN MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WA5NTI &#9;MC CARTY JR TERRY G 6498 MOCKINGBIRD LN MANASSAS VA 20111<br>WA8YCK &#9;RENNER CHARLES E 8004 URBANNA RD MANASSAS VA 20109<br>WB0NAA &#9;ROSSEAU JAMES E 10973 POPE ST MANASSAS VA 20109<br>WB1GTR &#9;SANOCKI JACK M 9376 RIVER CREST RD MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WB3IWY &#9;ENGMAN GERALD E 8870 H Golden Oak Drive Manassas VA 20109<br>WB4FUR &#9;MAPLES DAVID A 9590 TRIO LANE MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WB4HHN &#9;STEVENS RUSSELL J 8318 ROLLING RD MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WB4KFU &#9;KILLMER WILLIAM C 8905 FORT DRIVE MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WB4KTC &#9;TRAISTER SR ROBERT J 513 MANASSAS AVE FRONT ROYAL VA 22630<br>WB4R &#9;LUGO PASTOR 7715 ANDERSON CT MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WB4SDZ &#9;PARSONS GREGORY L 7124 DARK FOREST DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WB4ZOH &#9;Coghill III Kenneth R 9262 Byrd Drive Manassas VA 20110<br>WB7RAV &#9;COHEN RANDAL L 9218 GREENSHIRE DR MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>WD4ASP &#9;Paul Frederick J 7411 Clouds Hill Pl Manassas VA 20111<br>WD4AVU &#9;FLEMING EDGAR M 9305 BYRON ST MANASSAS VA 20111<br>WD4AZG &#9;MILLER RICHARD E PO BOX 1566 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WD4BWV &#9;SPARGER ROGER D 12606 PURCELL RD MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WD4DVR &#9;MULLINS MARK C 9310 NANCY ST MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>WD4FOX &#9;Gluck D C PO BOX 1068 Manassas VA 20108<br>WD4LWD &#9;NACHMAN STEVEN M 10848 Peachwood Dr Manassas VA 20110<br>WD4MES &#9;DOYLE GENE W 9421 SPOTSYLVANIA ST MANASSAS VA 20110<br>WD4OCQ &#9;HONEC JAMES R 9811 Brentsville Road Manassas VA 20112<br>WD4OEA &#9;HONEC III ROBERT B 9811 BRENTSVILLE RD MANASSAS VA 20112<br>WD4OJY &#9;Mc Kinley James E 8017 Ashland Ave Apt 11 Manassas VA 20109<br>WD4RKH &#9;MEADE BRENDA J PO BOX 1418 MANASSAS VA 22110<br>WG4ARC &#9;GILHAM GARY M 9432 BLACK HAWK CT MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>WP4ILI &#9;TORRES EDGARDO L PO BOX 2338 Manassas VA 20108<br>WW5W &#9;ROBISON GERALD P 8113 MAPLEWOOD DR MANASSAS VA 20111<br>HL9TM &#9;MOORE THOMAS QSL VIA W7KMA MANASSAS VA 20110 5883<br>KG4JBX &#9;NGUYEN TRUNG M 10112 TRINITY LN MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KG4JBL &#9;Leeper Brian C 9279 KRISTY DR MANASSAS PARK VA 20111<br>KG4GIY &#9;Lane David A 9327 Camphor Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>AG1Y &#9;YAKULIS ALEX G 8877 OLIVER CT 9 MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KI6FY &#9;LANG HEIDI R 9576 COVINGTON PLACE MANASSAS VA 20109<br>W4RVG &#9;GRUBER ROBERT V 8504 CLEARRIDGE LN MANASSAS VA 22110<br>KG4FLG &#9;Moriarty Kevin T 9277 Matthew Drive Manassas Park VA 20111<br>KG4PVD &#9;Wirsing Karlton E 7460 Donset Ct Manassas VA 20109<br>N2PJ &#9;James Jr Paul F 7694 Well St Manassas VA 20111<br>W4MFM &#9;O MARA SEAN P 6913 TRUMPETER SWAN LN MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KG4IIO &#9;Allen Jr Irby L 9582 Buttonbush Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4IIQ &#9;Earle Jason M 10123 Woodbury Dr 312 Manassas VA 20109<br>KG4IIT &#9;Sirgany Lois A 9999 Marian Dr Manassas VA 20111<br>N1WV &#9;KUNDROCK ALAN D 7026 BRUIN CT MANASSAS VA 22111<br>N4UDE &#9;Shaw William A 7505 Castle Road Manassas VA 20109<br>K4RHM &#9;MICHAEL RICHARD H 7340 KURT KAHN TRL MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KB3FRB &#9;Caton Kathleen E 8115 Bayonet Way 102 Manassas VA 20109<br>KD7KWB &#9;Rogers Scott D 319 Moseby Court H Manassas Park VA 20111<br>KG4KZX &#9;Davis Kevin M 9649 Old Wellington Road Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4LAA &#9;Leonard John E 9146 Stevens Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4LAB &#9;Thomas Frederick A 9220 Greenshire Drive Manassas Park VA 20111<br>KD7LSC &#9;Ayres Robert J 10260 Launch Circle 103 Manassas VA 20109<br>W3RJS &#9;STEPIEN ROBERT J 10053 FIELD CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KG4OJG &#9;FRITSCH TIMOTHY R 8058 Stillbrooke Rd Manassas VA 20112<br>KG4NXT &#9;Heartney John P 10535 Cedar Creek Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>KG4NXV &#9;Heartney Elizabeth A 10535 Cedar Creek Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>WA8ZSN &#9;WYBORSKI WANDA J 9625 Branchview Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KD5PCD &#9;Bejtlich Richard M 9332 Eagle Court Manassas Park VA 20111<br>AG4KD &#9;Stork James D 9021 Tyler Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>K3SSP &#9;Poulin Susan S 8114 Lomond South Dr Manassas VA 20110<br>N1SN &#9;POULIN JEFFREY M 8114 LOMOND SOUTH DR MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KG4OWX &#9;Parcells Patrick A 5765 White Flint Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>KG4QXD &#9;Bull Nancy J 10809 Daisy Court Manassas VA 20109<br>KG4QXJ &#9;Rachford Joshua B 10229 Trellis Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4QXK &#9;O Hanlon Brian P 10024 Green Brook Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4QXO &#9;Coghill Charlotte G 9262 Byrd Dr Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4QXN &#9;Cooney Zachary S 10331 Gent Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>WA2GLA &#9;RHODES DONALD C 10827 Gambril Dr Apt 11 Manassas VA 20109<br>KG4TJR &#9;Buchheit Nathan A 5744 Fincastle Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>KG4TLS &#9;Ansahene Kwasi 7750 Keara Ct 303 Manassas VA 20109<br>KG4TSW &#9;Dockery Gary A 84 Haire St Manassas VA 20112<br>KG4TVI &#9;Golaszewski Timothy M 9422 Robnel Ave Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4TVG &#9;Wikfors Edwin A 8903 Barnett St Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4TVM &#9;HEARTNEY THERESA E 10535 CEDAR CREEK DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KG4TVH &#9;Yarid Audrey S 10107 Quayle Court Manassas VA 20109<br>W4PWC &#9;PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY VA ARES 11053 CAMFIELD CT 002 MANASSAS VA<br>K4OPS &#9;SHILLING HAROLD T 9166 LAURELWOOD CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KD4IIX &#9;Korich Frederick M 10253 Brookstone Ct Manassas VA 20109<br>WM4RM &#9;WOODBRIDGE WIRELESS INC 6913 TRUMPETER SWAN LANE MANASSAS VA 201<br>K4MCO &#9;Young Sean B 8655 Centerton Ln Manassas VA 20111<br>K2RWD &#9;Dittrich Roger W 10293 7TH REGIMENT DR APT 105 MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KG4WNQ &#9;THOMAS STEVEN F 9200 Afton Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>KG4WVE &#9;Chapman Scott A 232 Cabbel Dr Manassas VA 20111<br>KG4WVF &#9;Buchheit Sarah R 5744 Fincastle Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>W4MKE &#9;BROOKS GREGORY M 7807 KING CT MANASSAS VA 20109<br>KG4ZJB &#9;Brown Michael E 8120 Weatherwood Ct Manassas VA 20109<br>KG4ZQX &#9;Seigfreid Christopher M 7313 Rokeby Dr Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4AFR &#9;May Kenneth A 8212 Honeysuckle Rd Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4AWP &#9;Perry Michael A 11037 Edgepark Circle 202 Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4AWQ &#9;Mastel Paul N 8113 Weatherwood Ct 204 Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4AZM &#9;Forrest Heidi S 6121 Turkey Run Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4AZN &#9;Moody Christopher D 10375 Navarone Place Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4AZO &#9;Wiley David W 9587 Nittany Dr Apt 201 Manassas VA 20110<br>AG4ZZ &#9;Kline Wayne E 13505 Bradford Ln Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4BNL &#9;Meyer Robert B 13615 Spriggs Rd Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4BPB &#9;Jesudason Basil I 9418 Corey Dr Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4COA &#9;Moseley Jr Craig D 6365 Hemlock Ridge Ct Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4COL &#9;Pagel Dana L 11986 Coverstone Hill Circle 1113 Manassas VA 20109<br>K4ECA &#9;Collyer Curtis R 10291 Abbott Rd Manassas VA 20110<br>W4HOE &#9;McMillan Jr Cornelius 10142 LAKE JACKSON DRIVE MANASSAS VA 20111<br>KI4VHF &#9;BELCHER JERRY R 10216 WATERBURY CT MANASSAS VA 20110<br>KI4EAY &#9;Korich Amyee M 10253 Brookstone Ct Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4EOH &#9;Swingle Kenneth D 6468 Davis Ford Rd Manassas VA 20111<br>K4GVT &#9;TARNOVSKY GEORGE V 8314 MORNINGSIDE DR MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KI4FQF &#9;Gilham Patricia K 9432 Black Hawk Ct Manassas Park VA 20111<br>KI4FVV &#9;Lane Dianne M 9327 Camphor Ct Manassas VA 20110<br>WC4J &#9;Cochran Jack B 11053 Camfield Ct 002 Manassas VA 20109<br>K4MDW &#9;WEBB MICHAEL D 12700 Crystal Lake Court Manassas VA 20112<br>N3OH &#9;South William B 6074 River Forest Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4HMG &#9;Wodrich Adam C 11027 Edge Park Ct 304 Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4HMH &#9;Bothe Kristi A 11027 Edge Park Ct 304 Manassas VA 20109<br>AI4II &#9;Agnew Dwight A 9335 King George Dr Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4IST &#9;Gustavus Robert L 8703 Barnett St Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4JEB &#9;Harris Carol J 7807 King Ct Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4JHR &#9;BONGERS MARTIN P 14080 Wellman CT MANASSAS VA 20112<br>KI4JPY &#9;Trump Thomas N 8115 Knightshayes Drive Manassas VA 20111<br>K4CGC &#9;Shrout III Roy B 10502 Fairweather Court Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4KLW &#9;Eagans Cameron W 10621 Winfield Loop Manassas VA 20109<br>KI4KXJ &#9;Demaret Richard B 10329 Cabin Ridge Court Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4MAD &#9;Wismer Timothy L 7301 Spriggs Ford Ct Manassas VA 20111<br>KI4MIX &#9;IMC Radio Club 7000 Infantry Ridge Road Suite 200 Manassas VA 20<br>KI4MNH &#9;Outland John J 12808 Canova Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>K9IMC &#9;IMC Radio Club 7000 Infantry Ridge Road Suite 200 Manassas VA 20<br>KI4NFH &#9;Langheld Deborah 12011 Bradley Forest Rd Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4OBU &#9;Akers Christopher H 8266 Highland St Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4OWH &#9;Price John B 6289 Occoquan Forest Dr Manassas VA 20112<br>KI4PCM &#9;Rabe Patrisha J 8587 Jayhawk Terrace 204 Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4POT &#9;Allen Christopher B 9160 Pristine CT Manassas VA 20110<br>KI4PVG &#9;Chrobak Walter J 8894 Bond Court Manassas VA 20110<br><br>Copyright &copy; 2006 by QRZ.COM<br>Sat Jun 17 16:49:20 2006 UTC<br><br>Hams are essential to public service. Contact one of these Hams living in Manassass, VA and see for yourself. I'm sure they would be glad to "inform" you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320691</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:50:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320521</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1318432"><b>K4GVT</b></A> : Well obviously your misguided view is one sided.<br>Look, BPL is flawed even from a data exchange point of view.<br>If the system was in full use the data rate would so low do to packet collisions.<br>We hear and see this even with the limited customer base here in Manassas.<br>If you think this is a panacea for linking to the Internet, think again.<br>Why not focus on wireless technology instead?<br><br>Additionally BPL is highly susceptible to ingress from other RF sources.<br>Are you prepared to be interrupted by every mobile (not just Hams) operator<br>driving through town.  "BPL is a "flawed technology!"<br><br>George<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320521</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320397</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/799805"><b>David95037</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  zod5000 <A HREF="/useremail/u/889530"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>If there were a big disaster, one would think the power would get knocked out, and the interference would stop, but <br> </DIV>Q: If the power goes out in an area, BPL interference will go out as well, so Hams could then provide emergency services, so what is the problem? <br><br>A: Amateurs need to maintain equipment and practice needed skills before a disaster occurs. If the equipment is unusable during regular times, what is the motivation even to buy equipment? Another thing to consider is that emergency stations need to be able to communicate out to areas that do have power.<br><br>From the BPL FAQ;<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html#21" >www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html#21</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320397</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:54:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>lame</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/909330"><b>grcore</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  markopoleo <A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol<br> </DIV>That was a pretty lame troll...<br><br>You can do better can't you?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320375</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:46:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320372</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/889530"><b>zod5000</b></A> : I always thought they were still concerned about HAM radio in case of emergencies, and you need to use something else for communication.<br><br>Look at the communication problems that happened in New Orleans last year.  I don't entirely understand how they work, but they are long range analog devices aren't they?  They would seem to be a rather handy item to have in such a case.<br><br>If there were a big disaster, one would think the power would get knocked out, and the interference would stop, but I guess the powers one of the first things they try and put back on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320372</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:46:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sounds like a annoyed HAM op.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320318</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/794284"><b>markopoleo</b></A> : Honestly, how many HAM ops can there be in Manassas, Virginia that can get the FCC to shut down a whole ISP..<br><br>Lets hope common sense hits the FCC in the head, maybe even send the ham ops takedown orders instead. lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16320318</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jun 2006 11:35:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
