<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16336975</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:56:28 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:56:28 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16338005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/723638"><b>johnh123</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Camelot One <A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>What I meant was that "preferred providers" would continue to pull at the current everyone package speed, but with no decrease in price, everyone else would be capped at a lower rate. I don't see them uncapping anything, just finding another way to charge a premium from certain providers just to give the consumer the same speed we are getting now.<br> </DIV>I think you'll see pigs fly before you see that happen.  The goal is for them to get more customers and revenue, not less.  They've already as much as said that they would offer higher/uncapped speeds to the preferred providers.  <br><br>They have been offering higher speeds at a lower price lately...this would allow them to have an even better offering, but with some revenue attached to it.  And everybody is happy- customer gets a better product, 3rd party gets a customer, and AT&T gets more revenue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16338005</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:18:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16336975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : What I meant was that "preferred providers" would continue to pull at the curent everyone package speed, but with no decrease in price, everyone else would be capped at a lower rate. I don't see them uncapping anything, just finding another way to charge a premium from certain providers just to give the consumer the same speed we are getting now.<br><SMALL>--<br>AMD X2 4800+ @2700Mhz/   MSI K8N Neo 4 Platinum SLI/   4x 1024Mb Corsair XMS PC4000/   WD 74Gb Raptor/   PNY 7800GTs SLI/   Antec 550 True Control/Custom water cooler</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16336975</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 07:56:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16333131</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/723638"><b>johnh123</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Camelot One <A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I think you'll see no change in prices, but caps placed on everything but "preferred providers".<br> </DIV>Sure; that is another way of saying the same thing.  Preferred providers are speed uncapped, the rest stay like they have always been.  So there is a net benefit to the consumer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16333131</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331819</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : I think you'll see no change in prices, but caps placed on everything but "preferred providers".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331819</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:21:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331388</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/723638"><b>johnh123</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Camelot One <A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I can see this being ATTs alternative to the whole net neutrality debate. Sell your DSL connection at a given speed (say, 6/1) but users only get those speeds on the ATT network. Anything that requires true internet access is only 1/3rd the speed.<br><br> </DIV>It will be the other way around.  They'll sell the dsl for $15/1.5, and if you are getting something from a preferred provider, they'll uncap it.  Not a bad deal.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16331388</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:13:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Begining of the 2 tier network access plan?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16330874</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/519917"><b>Camelot One</b></A> : I can see this being ATTs alternative to the whole net neutrality debate. Sell your DSL connection at a given speed (say, 6/1) but users only get those speeds on the ATT network. Anything that requires true internet access is only 1/3rd the speed.<br><br>Alternatively, my old provider in FL sold their DSL connections based on internet speed. (I think at the time it was a 3/768 connection) However, speed to/from other TBDSL users and their servers, anything that didn't require passing beyond the providers net routers, would run up to 14/4. They didn't advertise this feature, they just mentioned it when you ordered. I loved it, more so since their web hosting was cheap, and I could send files to my hosted server very quickly.<br><SMALL>--<br>AMD X2 4800+ @2700Mhz/   MSI K8N Neo 4 Platinum SLI/   4x 1024Mb Corsair XMS PC4000/   WD 74Gb Raptor/   PNY 7800GTs SLI/   Antec 550 True Control/Custom water cooler</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16330874</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 10:43:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
