Fee vs. Free in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16344783 en Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:02:02 EDT Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:02:02 EDT Re: Fee vs. Free http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16346514 lawrence171 : Oh, but people bitch about these ads all the time.

With TV, they can find a way of not allowing you to skip the ads.

With the internet/computer software, people can easily crack their softwares.
--
What I used to be I no longer am... God, why can't you freeze time for my sake?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16346514 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:47:20 EDT Re: Fee vs. Free http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16345377 TKJunkMail :
said by chakey See Profile :

It has worked for the television and radio industry for years. Offering a fee-based ad-free version or a free ad-driven version works. Either way, the offering company makes money.
Well at least one company disagrees with that conclusion - MobilePro. And since Sacramento has decided it won't allow an ad-free fee model, that option is gone from their bidding process.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16345377 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:44:37 EDT Fee vs. Free http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16344783 chakey : It has worked for the television and radio industry for years. Offering a fee-based ad-free version or a free ad-driven version works. Either way, the offering company makes money. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16344783 Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:04:49 EDT