<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16439923</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:30:38 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:30:38 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439972</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><b>DaveNJ</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  patcat88 <A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DaveNJ <A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><br><br>Cable has been the winner on internet connectivity for years, and dsl/fios is just catching up. Once cable feels a threat they will react, <B>DS3</B> will appear once telco dsl up the ante. But either way its going to be incremental why would the telco tip there hand early, when they can go up 2m at a time ?<br> </DIV>I dont mean to nit pick, but DS3 is a synonym of a T3 line. It took me a few secs to figure you ment DOCSIS3. <br> </DIV>I just didnt feel like typing docsis 3.0, maybe a good choice would be Doc3. <br><SMALL>--<br>the darkest moment is often just before dawn (unless we hold onto the darkness). Anxiety spoils everything and solves nothing.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439972</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:55:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/377729"><b>dvd536</b></A> : DSL will NEVER catch up to cable due to distance issues. if a cable company offers a certain speed, I can get it. NOT SO with DSL.<br><SMALL>--<br>You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439923</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439706</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/611909"><b>patcat88</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  DaveNJ <A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Cable has been the winner on internet connectivity for years, and dsl/fios is just catching up. Once cable feels a threat they will react, <B>DS3</B> will appear once telco dsl up the ante. But either way its going to be incremental why would the telco tip there hand early, when they can go up 2m at a time ?<br> </DIV>I dont mean to nit pick, but DS3 is a synonym of a T3 line. It took me a few secs to figure you ment DOCSIS3. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439706</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:12:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439178</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1357547"><b>cwh</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  pabster <A HREF="/useremail/u/534471"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>VDSL is a pipe dream. And remember guys, not everybody lives in an apartment building. <br> </DIV>Why is it a pipe dream when it has been succefully deployed overseas and is curently being deployed here?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439178</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:55:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439160</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/534471"><b>pabster</b></A> : Of course you "don't hear of caps as often with DSL as cable". That's because DSL is (by and large) MUCH slower than the cable offerings. Here Cable is (literally) 10x faster than the fastest DSL (and cheaper to boot). Thus with your slow DSL connection there is little need for caps.<br><br>VDSL is a pipe dream. And remember guys, not everybody lives in an apartment building. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16439160</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 13:52:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16437887</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772673"><b>hescominsoon</b></A> : REally?  Hrmm i don't hear of onerous caps with dsl nearly as often as you do almost with a certainty on cable.  I have 3/768 and it jsut works great.  6/512 jsut doesn't apeal as the upload is what counts these days with attachments getting larger and games requiring more bandwidth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16437887</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:18:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>docsis 3 will appear when needed</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16437854</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/107980"><b>DaveNJ</b></A> : Cable has been the winner on internet connectivity for years, and dsl/fios is just catching up. Once cable feels a threat they will react, DS3 will appear once telco dsl up the ante. But either way its going to be incremental why would the telco tip there hand early, when they can go up 2m at a time ?<br><SMALL>--<br>the darkest moment is often just before dawn (unless we hold onto the darkness). Anxiety spoils everything and solves nothing.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16437854</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 10:11:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
