said by Talon88 :

:::

For my Case, B10 run better than B11.

:::

said by ispalten :

Basically, the computer requests a new IP address via DHCP, and the router always doles out the same (reserved) IP address.

I always make sure that the fixed address I choose is outside the range that is normally allocated via DHCP but I'm not sure that's really necessary.

For example, my DHCP pool is 192.168.0.100 through 192.168.0.255. I have 3 machines on my network that are assigned fixed IP addresses by the router: 192.168.0.8, 192.168.0.16, and 192.168.0.32. Every machine is still set up with a dynamically assigned IP address in its network settings.
[/BQUOTE ]
Yes, that is what I had been doing, using the MAC address to assign IP address always to the same one. However, with the latest firmware that is problematic. Worked fine under 2.71b11 but not the lastest. Matter of fact, when I set one up (all show as unknown in 2.75B) the other disappeared for a period of time. Later when I rebooted my setting was gone as well. Under 2.71 is stays and works.

Irv
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16472091 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:11:14 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471854 krick :

said by ispalten :

Although there are 3 computers on the network, only 2 are usually on. Mine and my wifes. I usually turn mine on first as I'm up earlier. Last night she turned hers on while mine was off andleft hers on and I couldn't get connected this morning. Why? Because since I use FTP and NETMEETING occasionally, I've set my network connection to always be 192.168.0.100. Hers was DHCP, whatever it gets. We hit a conflict as hers was on overnight. Not a problem, I was able to set hers to be 192.168.0.101 and I can get reconnected. However, the ROUTER doesn't see me at all? I noticed this prior to today with the new flash firmware, as it showed my name as UNKNOWN but I did see the MAC address clone and set it to me, but didn't give it much though. On the HOME, DHCP page only her system shows now?

If you want your computer to always be 192.168.0.100, leave the PCs DHCP *ON* and tell the router to always assign 192.168.0.100 to your computer's mac address.

Basically, the computer requests a new IP address via DHCP, and the router always doles out the same (reserved) IP address.

I always make sure that the fixed address I choose is outside the range that is normally allocated via DHCP but I'm not sure that's really necessary.

For example, my DHCP pool is 192.168.0.100 through 192.168.0.255. I have 3 machines on my network that are assigned fixed IP addresses by the router: 192.168.0.8, 192.168.0.16, and 192.168.0.32. Every machine is still set up with a dynamically assigned IP address in its network settings.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471854 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:40:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16470696 decane : 2 days of uptime, non of my folder went disappear. I was using 2.71b11, but the shared folder would disappear within 1 hour.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16470696 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:42:15 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16469303 tqhoang :

said by JTS33 :

2.75b2 does have the issue of Windows shared folders disappearing from the network after some time (manually rebooting router gets the shared folders to reappear). I had this issue with 2.5x firmware versions, but not 2.71 firmware versions. Since 2.75b2 looks to be derived from the 2.5x line, I'm not too surprised.

FWIW, WPA2 + AES is now working after a few days of being idle...that's with my Intel 2915ABG mini-pci card and the latest Intel driver package v10.1.1.3.

Are you browsing other machines or are you trying to access the share directly via Start->Run?

Also does anyone know how to fix the startup error on the Router Connection Monitor? It keeps coming up with a runtime error 339 and that "RICHTX32.OCX or one of its dependencies not correctly registered".
--
M$ WinXP Pro SP2 + WPA2
D-Link DI-624 revC3 Fw 2.71b11
D-Link DWL-G520 revB3
D-Link DWL-G650 revB5
NETGEAR WGT624v2 Fw 4.2.10
NETGEAR WG511T
NETGEAR WG311T]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16469303 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:43:10 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16468671 JTS33 :

said by decane :

I have the exact opposite, windows shared folder DOES NOT disappear with the 2.75beta, but with all other versions i have, they all disappear (well except 2.42)

That's interesting. I didn't get the disappaering act with 2.71b10 and 2.71b11, but I do with 2.75b2. Assuming your router is stable and doesn't randomly reboot itself, have you allowed a couple days to go by to see if the Windows shared folders are still visible?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16468671 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:25:57 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16468665 decane : I have the exact opposite, windows shared folder DOES NOT disappear with the 2.75beta, but with all other versions i have, they all disappear (well except 2.42)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16468665 Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:17:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16467957 lucky644 :

said by Talon88 :

:::

For my Case, B10 run better than B11.

:::

said by biiqydanz :

hey talon.. is the b10 version you have running stable?

Hey, wanted to post in your crash recovery thread(s) but this silly board won't let me.

Pretty dumb.

ANYHOW, I tried many times and eventually gave up, rebooted several times a day and drove me up the wall. Recently I gave it another shot, did the directions perfectly and installed older firmware (2.53) and the router has had perfect uptime for over a month now.

I'm weary about trying this new firmware....I want to upgrade because of the new features, but then again I don't want my router breaking again straying from 2.53...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16467957 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 23:56:24 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466919 Talon88 :
:::

For my Case, B10 run better than B11.

:::

said by biiqydanz :

hey talon.. is the b10 version you have running stable?

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466919 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:49:51 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466847 biiqydanz : !!!!!!!!!!!! lol

nice session man.. yea im gonna give the b10 a try but 2.42 has been great for me but i assume this b10 is better]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466847 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:35:25 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466794 Cthen :

said by biiqydanz :

hey talon.. is the b10 version you have running stable?

I can't speak for Talon but 2.71b10 is very stable for me. :D

]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466794 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 20:23:11 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466530 biiqydanz : what vulnerbilities did you experience?

i have had 2.42 since ive bought the router.. i havent changed it yet but im thinking about testing some.. i was leaning towards the 2.71b10.. do you think thats the best one?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16466530 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 19:38:18 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16465216 JTS33 : My router hasn't rebooted since I loaded and configured the 2.75b2 firmware (almost 3 days now). 2.71b11 worked fine for me too, but these previous firmware versions apparently have the vulnerability/exploit described in this forum.

EDIT: I disabled UPnP in the router, and the reboots began just like it did with previous firmware versions. As long as I keep UPnP on, it's stable.

2.75b2 does have the issue of Windows shared folders disappearing from the network after some time (manually rebooting router gets the shared folders to reappear). I had this issue with 2.5x firmware versions, but not 2.71 firmware versions. Since 2.75b2 looks to be derived from the 2.5x line, I'm not too surprised.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16465216 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 14:58:17 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16464202 biiqydanz : hey talon.. is the b10 version you have running stable?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16464202 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 11:50:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16464169 decane : It seems to be stable for me so far. Connection util shows 23 hours of uptime (i do BT, all machines wireless, plus a VOIP modem). I m using a C1 Rev though]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16464169 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 11:44:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16463566 ispalten :

said by tqhoang :

1. Have you had these constant reboots with other firmwares before this one?

For what it is worth, like I said, I went back to the older Beta, and here is the Connection Monitor data since I went back.

=========
Up Time: 22:16:39 Boot: Saturday 7/8/2006 11:03:43 AM
WAN IP: 70.121.179.80 DNS: 65.32.5.74, 65.32.5.75 Network: {1}
Model: DI-624 Firmware: 2.71, Mon, 3 Oct 2005 Address: 192.168.0.1
========

Almost 1 day running without a reboot. With the newest Beta I never got more than a few hours, and usually less than 1 before it rebooted.
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16463566 Sun, 09 Jul 2006 09:23:43 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458452 ispalten :

said by tqhoang :

I don't believe you show up in the list since it seems to be generated via DHCP requests. Unless the DI-624 is doing some kind of Reverse ARP (RARP), it won't be able to figure out a name for your statically assigned box.

Also you said it's able to ping, nslookups, and traceroute's, so you're fine.

It seems that given enough time it comes up and is recognized. I've given up on this version and went back to the B11 versions. It seems it too has 'unknown' as the name of the machine.
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458452 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:51:31 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458442 ispalten :

said by tqhoang :

1. Have you had these constant reboots with other firmwares before this one?

Not the last one, the B11 version. It was usually solid for days on end.

said by tqhoang :

2. With your wireless clients, do you see any other access points using channel 6 in the area?

Not using wireless, only hardwired at this time. It didn't seem to matter if wireless was on or off.
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458442 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:50:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458393 tqhoang : This is someone on the outside trying to access the TCP and UDP ports on your router. This is very common with bots & script kiddies out on the Internet. Your router is doing the right thing and blocking them.

You should just turn off most of the logging since it will just fill up with this stuff.

1. Have you had these constant reboots with other firmwares before this one?

2. With your wireless clients, do you see any other access points using channel 6 in the area?
--
M$ WinXP Pro SP2 + WPA2
D-Link DI-624 revC3 Fw 2.71b11
D-Link DWL-G520 revB3
D-Link DWL-G650 revB5
NETGEAR WGT624v2 Fw 4.2.10
NETGEAR WG511T
NETGEAR WG311T]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458393 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:40:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458357 tqhoang : I don't believe you show up in the list since it seems to be generated via DHCP requests. Unless the DI-624 is doing some kind of Reverse ARP (RARP), it won't be able to figure out a name for your statically assigned box.

Also you said it's able to ping, nslookups, and traceroute's, so you're fine.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16458357 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 11:35:55 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16457840 ispalten : This seems to be getting worse now. I decided after seeing many DROPPED PACKETS in the log after enabling all options to do a RESET to factory default settings via the TOOLS, SYSTEM MENU.

Ah hah! Both computer MAC Addresses now show with UNKNOWN as the name. Cloned LARAINEP4 and replaced UNKNOWN with it and pressed APPLY. That took, but IRVS (my machine) disappeared from the DHCP list...

Also, in the LOG see these...

==========
Time Message Source Destination Note
Jul/08/2006 09:49:09 Drop TCP packet from WAN 65.32.5.46:110 70.121.179.80:60007 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:48:08 Drop TCP packet from WAN 65.32.5.46:110 70.121.179.80:60007 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:47:46 Drop TCP packet from WAN 148.129.75.160:80 70.121.179.80:60093 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:47:06 Drop TCP packet from WAN 65.32.5.46:110 70.121.179.80:60007 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:46:40 Drop TCP packet from WAN 148.129.75.160:80 70.121.179.80:60093 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:46:05 Drop TCP packet from WAN 65.32.5.46:110 70.121.179.80:60007 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:45:35 Drop UDP packet from WAN 204.16.208.103:46622 70.121.179.80:1027 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:45:35 Drop UDP packet from WAN 204.16.208.103:46622 70.121.179.80:1026 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:45:34 Drop TCP packet from WAN 148.129.75.160:80 70.121.179.80:60093 Rule: Default deny
Jul/08/2006 09:45:20 Drop TCP packet from WAN 70.97.18.28:3907 70.121.179.80:1433 Rule: Default deny

and many more too...
-----------

I can't find any reason for this? Nothing on ADVANCED, FILTERS, FIREWALL, or VIRTUAL SERVER seems to be the cause of this blocked. My system firewall doesn't report anything wrong either? Where are these set?
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16457840 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 09:58:57 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16457444 ispalten :

said by JTS33 :

Let us know how it goes. I've been up 24 hours with the new firmware without a reboot so far (UPnP enabled). I will try disabling UPnP to see if that causes a reboot.

It is getting worse with it enabled, more frequent boots.

Not only that, I now find some 'real' problems.

Although there are 3 computers on the network, only 2 are usually on. Mine and my wifes. I usually turn mine on first as I'm up earlier. Last night she turned hers on while mine was off andleft hers on and I couldn't get connected this morning. Why? Because since I use FTP and NETMEETING occasionally, I've set my network connection to always be 192.168.0.100. Hers was DHCP, whatever it gets. We hit a conflict as hers was on overnight. Not a problem, I was able to set hers to be 192.168.0.101 and I can get reconnected. However, the ROUTER doesn't see me at all? I noticed this prior to today with the new flash firmware, as it showed my name as UNKNOWN but I did see the MAC address clone and set it to me, but didn't give it much though. On the HOME, DHCP page only her system shows now?

================
Static DHCP Client List
Host Name IP Address MAC Address
LaraineP4 192.168.0.101 00-e0-18-55-52-87 editdelete
Dynamic DHCP Client List
Host Name IP Address MAC Address Expired Time
LaraineP4 192.168.0.100 00-e0-18-55-52-87 Jul/15/2006 06:57:53
================

Note the different IP addresses for LARAINEP4, the one 192.168.0.100 is IRVS, not LARAINEP4. This is the STATUS, LOG entries, complete...

===========
page 1 of 1
Time Message Source Destination Note
Jul/08/2006 06:58:06 DHCP lease IP 192.168.0.100 to LaraineP4 00-e0-18-55-52-87
Jul/08/2006 06:57:21 DHCP lease IP 192.168.0.100 to LaraineP4 00-e0-18-55-52-87
Jul/08/2006 06:57:08 DHCP Request success 70.121.179.80
Jul/08/2006 06:57:08 DHCP Request 70.121.179.80
Jul/08/2006 06:57:07 DHCP Discover
Jul/08/2006 06:57:07 System started
Jul/08/2006 06:57:00 AP 2.4GHz mode Ready. Channel : 6 TxRate : best SSID : dlink
Jul/08/2006 06:57:00 Access point: dlink started at channel 6.
===========

How could I not show (I'm on IRVS right now typing this)? LARAINEP4 is at 192.168.0.101 right now and I'm 192.168.0.100. I tired clearing the log and it clears, but NO NEW entries appear? It is like it isn't working?

Proof I'm connected however.

==========
c:\>net view
Server Name Remark

---------------------------------------------
\\IRVS Irv's Gen 5
\\LARAINEP4 P4 Sony - PCV-RX650
The command completed successfully.

c:\>ipconfig /all

Windows IP Configuration

Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : IrvS
Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . :
Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No

Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 4:

Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom NetXtreme 57xx Gigabit Cont
roller
Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-12-3F-6B-9D-F2
Dhcp Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.100
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.1
=============

How can this be?

From the Connection Monitor

Up Time: 0:18:15 Boot: Saturday 7/8/2006 6:56:35 AM
WAN IP: 70.121.179.80 DNS: 65.32.5.74, 65.32.5.75 Network: {2}
Model: DI-624 Firmware: 2.75, Thu, 29 Jun 2006 Address: 192.168.0.1

Suggestions? I do feel this firmware IS FASTER, but it is annoying. With the older version I had the three machines set up to different IP addresses by MAC address. This version doesn't seem to see my computer's MAC address as IRVS but it was showing as UNKNOWN. Today, even that doesn't show, only LARAINEP4 is available? Even then, LARAINEP4 is listed as my IP address even though it has a different one?

I released and renewed the DHCP lease and that changed in the log. On the HOME, DHCP tag I did APPLY and it changed the data,

-----------------
Static DHCP Client List
Host Name IP Address MAC Address
LaraineP4 192.168.0.101 00-e0-18-55-52-87 editdelete
Dynamic DHCP Client List
Host Name IP Address MAC Address Expired Time
unknown 192.168.0.100 00-12-3f-6b-9d-f2 Jul/15/2006 07:24:17
---------------

However, I still do NOT show? I can PING and it works and resolves addresses, so does TRACERT? Why don't I show in the list to assign IP addresses?

Distressing to say the least? I've enabled all the LOG settings, maybe this will show something?

Anyone else see something similar?
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16457444 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 07:35:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16456613 JTS33 :

said by ispalten :

said by JTS33 :

said by ispalten :

UPNP Settings Disabled
Gaming Mode Disabled

Enable both of these settings. In particular, disabling UPnP causes reboots in previous firmware versions for many DI-624 Rev. C3 owners. I was hoping this would be fixed in this new firmware, but I guess not?

I did have these ON before and was continually rebooting. I reset them to ON again and I'll keep track.

Let us know how it goes. I've been up 24 hours with the new firmware without a reboot so far (UPnP enabled). I will try disabling UPnP to see if that causes a reboot.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16456613 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:36:27 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16456568 JTS33 :

said by ispalten :

said by JTS33 :

I just updated from 2.71b11 to 2.75b2

I noticed that SSID Broadcast can't be disabled...it'll always revert to enabled. Anyone else notice this?

Just tried this, you are right. Stays on. Was this little warning, "*Enabling Extended Range Mode will not allow to disable SSID Broadcast mode." there on prior firmware?

Yes it was. There must be another setting that forces SSID Broadcast mode to be enabled in this new firmware.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16456568 Sat, 08 Jul 2006 00:24:40 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16450560 ispalten :

said by JTS33 :

said by ispalten :

UPNP Settings Disabled
Gaming Mode Disabled

Enable both of these settings. In particular, disabling UPnP causes reboots in previous firmware versions for many DI-624 Rev. C3 owners. I was hoping this would be fixed in this new firmware, but I guess not?

I did have these ON before and was continually rebooting. I reset them to ON again and I'll keep track.

-------
Up Time: 0:01:22 Boot: Friday 7/7/2006 6:16:31 AM
WAN IP: 70.121.179.80 DNS: 65.32.5.74, 65.32.5.75 Network: {1}
Model: DI-624 Firmware: 2.75, Thu, 29 Jun 2006 Address: 192.168.0.1
-------

We'll see how long it stays up I guess.
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16450560 Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:19:22 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16450553 ispalten :

said by JTS33 :

I just updated from 2.71b11 to 2.75b2

I noticed that SSID Broadcast can't be disabled...it'll always revert to enabled. Anyone else notice this?

Just tried this, you are right. Stays on. Was this little warning, "*Enabling Extended Range Mode will not allow to disable SSID Broadcast mode." there on prior firmware?
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16450553 Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:15:43 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448980 JTS33 :

said by effortless :

I just tested and the exploit is now gone.

Which DI-624 firmware version were you able to take advantage of the exploit?
I thought someone else had posted that they weren't able to do the exploit on their DI-624.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448980 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:13:29 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448961 JTS33 : I just updated from 2.71b11 to 2.75b2

I noticed that SSID Broadcast can't be disabled...it'll always revert to enabled. Anyone else notice this?

My current wireless settings: SuperG without Turbo, Channel Auto Select off, Extended Range Mode disabled, WMM disabled, 802.11g only Mode enabled, WPA2-AES]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448961 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:11:38 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448750 JTS33 :

said by ispalten :

UPNP Settings Disabled
Gaming Mode Disabled

Enable both of these settings. In particular, disabling UPnP causes reboots in previous firmware versions for many DI-624 Rev. C3 owners. I was hoping this would be fixed in this new firmware, but I guess not?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448750 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:41:49 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448548 ispalten : The Connection monitor is working correctly, I didn't set the correct P/W which was wiped out by the flash.

The flash is NOT stable for me. I've been having constant reboots. I'm suspect about some settings, under TOOLS, MISC. I've got

=========
Block WAN Ping Disabled

UPNP Settings Disabled
Gaming Mode Disabled

VPN Pass-Through
PPTP Disabled
IPSec Disabled

Multicast Streams Enabled
==========

Don't use VPN so I'm pretty sure the last 2 shouldn't be an issue.

I have the DNS Relay on, and that should be I think?

I didn't check what I had before I flashed however, so it could be different.

I'm hard wired right now, and these are the settings for Wireless

=======
Super G Mode : SuperG with Dynamic Turbo

Extended Range Mode : Disabled
WMM Function (Wireless Qos): Disabled
802.11g Only Mode : Enabled
SSID Broadcast : Enabled
Security : WPA
Cipher Type: TKIP
PSK / EAP: PSK
========

Anything I should change or that might effect stability?

Here is my latest UPTIME

=====
Up Time: 0:25:22 Boot: Thursday 7/6/2006 8:48:27 PM
WAN IP: 70.121.179.80 DNS: 65.32.5.74, 65.32.5.75 Network: {2}
Model: DI-624 Firmware: 2.75, Thu, 29 Jun 2006 Address: 192.168.0.1
======

I only get about 1 hour max between reboots.
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16448548 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 21:15:16 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16446845 ispalten : I applied the latest Beta and it seems both stable and I swear faster?

However, version 1.7.95 of the Connection Monitor seems to have a problem with it...

----------
Up Time: 0:55:52 Boot: Thursday 7/6/2006 3:49:50 PM
Network: {2} (Could not get other router info: 401 Unauthorized)
----------

I do have a P/W and I need it to get into the web page, but it doesn't work with the monitor?

Irv
--
Irv Spalten]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16446845 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:47:37 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445278 tqhoang :

said by peter_m :

Any idea if the Intel and Broadcom client problems of the 2.70 firmware was fixed?

Can we now disable UPnP as well?

My Intel 2915ABG with driver package v10.1.1.3 connects fine using WPA or WPA2 (both with AES; untested with TKIP but I assume that works fine).

It seems the WPA2-Auto mode is no longer and option...and it doesn't work as a hidden feature of WPA2. The clients need to support WPA2 if you have that selected. Before with WPA2-Auto you could connect using WPA, but maybe that was causing the problems I had.

I'll have to disconnect my laptop for a few days to see if my WPA2 connection problems resurface. If you don't recall, after like 2+ days of not using the wireless, my laptop would authenticate, but would never get a DHCP IP address unless I manually rebooted the router.

Also I haven't disabled UPnP yet.
--
M$ WinXP Pro SP2 + WPA2
D-Link DI-624 revC3 Fw 2.71b11
D-Link DWL-G520 revB3
D-Link DWL-G650 revB5
NETGEAR WGT624v2 Fw 4.2.10
NETGEAR WG511T
NETGEAR WG311T]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445278 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:27:06 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445221 tqhoang :

said by di-624 :

It is totally unconfigurable. I have reset the router. I have to disable the wireless function. Maybe I should try the Crash Recovery procedure.

It seems mine reset the config settings to default after I loaded it. I was using 2.71b11 firmware, so maybe that's why I didn't have any problems.

At the very least, reset the router to defaults.
--
M$ WinXP Pro SP2 + WPA2
D-Link DI-624 revC3 Fw 2.71b11
D-Link DWL-G520 revB3
D-Link DWL-G650 revB5
NETGEAR WGT624v2 Fw 4.2.10
NETGEAR WG511T
NETGEAR WG311T]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445221 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 12:17:02 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445035 peter_m : Any idea if the Intel and Broadcom client problems of the 2.70 firmware was fixed?

Can we now disable UPnP as well?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16445035 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:45:47 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444957 anon : It is totally unconfigurable. I have reset the router. I have to disable the wireless function. Maybe I should try the Crash Recovery procedure.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444957 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 11:30:32 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444681 tqhoang :

said by di-624 :

Wireless Settings is full of bug. :(

Can you explain this a little better?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444681 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:41:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444585 anon : Wireless Settings is full of bug. :(]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16444585 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:22:41 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443626 effortless : I pulled out the old 624 yesterday just to test this firmware... I gave up on it because of the random reboots with all previous firmwares. I've only used it with one PC so far (don't want the whole house to kill me if the internet gets flaky), but it hasn't rebooted yet. Running with WEP and WMM and no superg. Maybe after all these years, they got it right?? The menus are also cleaner (no html errors or spacing where it shouldn't be).

F/W = 2.75, Build:0002 Date = Thu, 29 Jun 2006 CPU BSP: ar531x_wmm, 4.0.0.58, Apr, 25, 2006, build 0011 DRIVER: 1.0.0.0126, Jun, 28, 2006, build 0126 STACK: 1.0.0.1692, Jun, 27, 2006, Build 1692 AR5 WLAN MAC = ff-ff-ff-ff-ff-ff AR5 F/W = ar531x_wmm, 4.1.2.56, 12:00, 28 Jun, 2006, Build 1083 AR5 Domain = 0x10, FCC1_FCCA AR5 SSID = adlkjiosd Watch Dog = 1 Restore Default = 0 Checksum = 0x06332fe4

As you can see, everything is at least a half year newer than the previous firmware... it's definitely better than anything else before it, give it a try.

-- I just tested and the exploit is now gone. Jumpstart is gone (thank God). Automatic NTP appears to want a customized server (time.windows.com worked fine). Default SSID is now dlink. It's like an updated 2.59 firmware more or less (wmm on wireless page, no jumpstart, ddns works, more stable).]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443626 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:53:57 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443579 Talon88 : :::

Want to try, but the Config.bin setting file of
the last few version is not compatible
with this version. Back to v2.71B10 again....!

Anyone tried please post feed back....!

;)

:::]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443579 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 04:20:33 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443527 peter_m : »support.dlink.com/products/view.···4%5FrevC

It's got a big BETA warning so they are not responsible for it trashing your router.... Has anyone tried it? :D

Was it only to fix this: »Remotely Exploitable Vulnerability In All D-Link Gateways ?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16443527 Thu, 06 Jul 2006 03:41:39 EDT