<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Duh?! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16473094</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:48:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 02:48:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16473455</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/384896"><b>startshot</b></A> : woohooo woo hoo hoo .....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16473455</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 20:24:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16473094</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BigDaddy05 <A HREF="/useremail/u/982506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Lack of security costs even more.  These costs are simply hidden so it appears that having proper security measures in place is more costly.<br> </DIV>You seem to forget the short-sightedness of corporate America.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16473094</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:32:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16472363</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1083923"><b>rachelsfx</b></A> : Another reason they need PSC regulation and fines for stupidity!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16472363</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:50:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16472002</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/982506"><b>BigDaddy05</b></A> : Lack of security costs even more.  These costs are simply hidden so it appears that having proper security measures in place is more costly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16472002</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 17:00:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/189562"><b>moonpuppy</b></A> : Security costs money. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471763</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:23:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Duh?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471696</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : In this industry, how can security not be considered one of the top considerations?  Scams abound everywhere.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16471696</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 16:14:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
