<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it.. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16519684</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:57:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:57:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16523040</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : 'or the fact that BS fought against the temporary free muni mesh after a catastrophe?'<br><br>temporary means it comes to an end. So you should be happy BellSouth didn't fuss after the catastrophe and made sure it stayed temporary.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16523040</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:17:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16521614</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : It is $39.95 for 1.5mb/s with no residential phone service.<br><br>That's not a bad price.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16521614</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:09:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520476</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bogey780 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>BellSouth did deploy wireless. It just wasn't free which is what everyone here hates.<br> </DIV>$70 dollars? $30 .. even $40, but $70? That's just crazy.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - Quickly Locate Your IP!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520476</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:08:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519869</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : hey lay off him man. i mean after all he knows about Mayor Nagin and Cox communications. I]m amazing how he knows the pulse of LA from NY]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519869</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:07:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bogey780 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>What point have you made? <br></DIV>See #1-2.<br><br><div class="bquote">Your errors have been pointed out already and you barrel on making the same erroneous statements.<br></DIV>And what is "erroneus" actually? <br>The fact that BS lobbied for its <B>granted monopoly</B> or the fact that BS fought against the <B>temporary free muni mesh after a catastrophe?</B><br><br><div class="bquote">BellSouth opposed a taxpayer funded network that competed with them. It competed in them mostly in areas where service was restored or wireless service comparable in speed and cost to a landline was offered.<br><br>As I said, you're ignorant of the situation and swearing and stomping won't make you any more of an "expert".<br> </DIV> :uhh:<br>After recognising the classic blueprint of BS-spin in all of your reactions one can only wonder who do you work for...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520273</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:38:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520078</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : What point have you made? Your errors have been pointed out already and you barrel on making the same erroneous statements.<br><br>BellSouth opposed a taxpayer funded network that competed with them. It competed in them mostly in areas where service was restored or wireless service comparable in speed and cost to a landline was offered.<br><br>As I said, you're ignorant of the situation and swearing and stomping won't make you any more of an "expert".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16520078</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:10:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519990</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bogey780 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><BR><BR>1) BellSouth has dial-up internet which the gov't would directly compete against using a taxpayer funded network.<br></DIV>ROFL... wow, it's so pathetic "reasoning" that it requires no comment, it's telling about the mindset of BS (and its 'friends' like you) as it is.<br> :D<br><br><div class="bquote">2) The NO mesh network was mainly operating in areas that never went under water. <br></DIV>Umm I never thought you will take it <B>literally...</B><br><br> :uhh: <br>How about reflecting on my points...?<br><br><div class="bquote">Don't let your emotions overhwelm you to the point you spout off ignorantly.<br> </DIV>Yawn. Being such a BS-mouthpiece and arrogantly spouting its - usually deceptive - propaganda instead of answering at least ONE of my points is really making you look foolish, believe me...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519990</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:56:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519836</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : 1) BellSouth has dial-up internet which the gov't would directly compete against using a taxpayer funded network.<br><br>2) The NO mesh network was mainly operating in areas that never went under water. <br><br>Don't let your emotions overhwelm you to the point you spout off ignorantly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519836</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:30:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519762</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bogey780 <A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>BellSouth did deploy wireless. It just wasn't free which is what everyone here hates.<br> </DIV>Wrong.<br>We hate the fact that 1) they successfully lobbied for such a corrupt law 2) they attacked the free NO  mesh when it was still under water, only to protect their monopoly.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519762</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:18:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519692</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/974197"><b>bogey780</b></A> : BellSouth did deploy wireless. It just wasn't free which is what everyone here hates.<br><br>And BST has some of the largest DSL availability of any company.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519692</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:07:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/253223"><b>adsldog</b></A> : They did deploy something it was up and running within two weeks of Katrina. &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wirelessbb.bellsouth.net/sales/asp/WBB_OrderNow.asp" >www.wirelessbb.bellsouth.net/sal&middot;&middot;&middot;rNow.asp</A> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519684</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:05:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Of course BellSouth doesn&#x27;t like it..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519423</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : 1) They passed a law to make sure that nobody else could put anything better than 128kbps.  I smell Bell South (BS) lawsuit pending, warranted or not.<br><br>2) Its actual competition.  <br><br>I don't have a problem with it.  Bell South could have deployed something, however, BS appears to be the most slow moving, monopolistic, anticompetitive telco in North America.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16519423</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:23:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
