<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>[ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue in VOIP Tech Chat</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16551108</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:28:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:28:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16578261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956901"><b>Fisamo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  tsedlmeyer <A HREF="/useremail/u/1069548"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Don't take this the wrong way.  I do appreciated VT finally addressing this problem but it would have been nice if VT had used the BYOD alert list to disseminate this required change before implementing.<br> </DIV>I'm not taking it the wrong way--in fact, I completely agree with you.  They should have emailed info regarding the change to their BYOD customers.  In fact, (anyone can correct me if I'm wrong) I don't recall a FAQ on their website that lists VT's preferred settings (ie. what they'd provision all their PAP2's to, all account settings except SIP authentication creds and server ID.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16578261</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:08:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16578146</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1069548"><b>tsedlmeyer</b></A> : I came here looking for why my voicemail password stopped working yesterday. Switching from AUTO to INBAND fixed my issue.  Don't take this the wrong way.  I do appreciated VT finally addressing this problem but it would have been nice if VT had used the BYOD alert list to disseminate this required change before implementing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16578146</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:39:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16576705</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/880191"><b>MrTwister</b></A> : lol.. wait til next month when the DVD comes out... <br>lol.. just kidding...  If you could see what's happening<br>in this bed.. hmmmm. well lets just say.... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16576705</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:55:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16572199</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : That was a great visual MrTwister!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16572199</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:43:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16572159</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/880191"><b>MrTwister</b></A> : I tried my different IVR's and VM last night (PAP was already <br>set to inband), and much to my chagrin all is well in the land of DTMF tones.<br><br>So not to waste any time, I sallied forth to my garage, scooped up a lid from a cooler, 2 gallons of gas, and my old <br>phone.  I then proceeded to give my old phone a Viking funeral<br>with all the flames, pomp and fanfare.<br><br>No turning back now.<br><br>I'm in bed with VT for the long haul... <br>(now who do I contact to request silk sheets for this bed ??)<br><br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16572159</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:37:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16568746</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : Does anyone know of a Web site that will display the digits of a call you make to a number (Sort of a DTMF test site). If not, sounds like a cool Idea. Maybe even offer a Fax preview and send option for testing Fax Receive and Xmit. Just daydreaming a bit...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16568746</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:49:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16568690</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : I just tried Bank of America's IVR and it worked like a charm, no repeating of digits.  Good work!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16568690</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 20:41:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1006166"><b>venk25</b></A> : Inband works now.  <br><br>I had it in AVT on my BYOD PAP2 and it worked fine for VT VM system and outside too.  Now AVT doesn't work, but inband does !!<br><br>Great Work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564970</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:53:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564877</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1032716"><b>dcurrey</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Nate425 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1152407"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>So just to clarify/double check, we should be setting the DTMF Tx Method to Inband now?  <br><br>Great work Brendan and everybody who helped with this!<br> </DIV>Looks that way.  I just checked my pap2 and viatalk changed the DTMF to inband last night.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564877</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:36:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/685918"><b>mogulman</b></A> : this seems to work better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564639</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:47:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564546</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/911142"><b>guppy_fish</b></A> : Sorry Brendan, I went to bed before your early morning beta testing<br><br>Inband now works with ViaTalk Voice mail! , so I am happy to report with others this should once and for all slay the DTMF demon!<br><br>When you make this system wide ( inband ) let us know and I'll turn provisioning back on<br><br>Thank you for your outstanding support and listening to us here at BBR]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564546</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:24:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564537</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/880191"><b>MrTwister</b></A> : Sweet news, can't wait to get home and <br>make the changes.  If this works as I <br>figure it will, I can finally tell <br>AT&T/SBC to take their over-priced<br>landline and shove it where the sun<br>will never shine..<br><br>Here's to crossing my fingers!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564537</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:22:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564496</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894853"><b>poolek</b></A> : Dammit...  now you've fixed every issue I've had with Viatalk, regardless of how minor they were.  What the heck am I supposed to do on DSLReports now?  Do you actually expect me to pay attention at WORK?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564496</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 09:11:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564453</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1152407"><b>Nate425</b></A> : So just to clarify/double check, we should be setting the DTMF Tx Method to Inband now?  <br><br>Great work Brendan and everybody who helped with this!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564453</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:57:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564434</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956901"><b>Fisamo</b></A> : OK...  I just tried logging into the VM system, and I got the new voice (thanks).  However, with my DTMF set to Auto, it wouldn't recognize my tones (kept saying incorrect password).  That happened when I dialed *123; when I dialed my own number, the * would not interrupt the greeting, so I couldn't enter my password.  <B>However, switching to inband solved the problem.</B>  I haven't tried the new settings on other IVRs yet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564434</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:52:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564251</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/889832"><b>NoVaVoiper</b></A> : Seems to be working on my VT issued PAP-2.<br>Thanks for your attentiveness to this issue!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564251</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:44:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564247</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : Awesome!!!!  It works. Great job Viatalk!!! Thanks Brendan, you guys rock!. <br><br>Bill B]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564247</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 07:43:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1187423"><b>davco</b></A> : I am BYOD also. I changed to 'inband' and it works for me too.  :D<br><br>You guys are the greatest!<br><br>Who buys breakfast today?  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16564008</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:43:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563935</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/651075"><b>devil24</b></A> : It seems to be working so far for me too... and I'm BYOD.<br><br>Thanks a lot... and keep up the good work!!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563935</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:01:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563777</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : They probably don't have recurring nightmares of being chased around by giant phones screaming random DTMF tones at them. ;) I figure if I'm gonna have guys in working on stuff at 3am I might as well be here with them trying to help out.<br><br>-Brendan<br><SMALL>--<br>ViaTalk BroadBand Phone Service Behind The Scenes: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.VTInside.com" >www.VTInside.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563777</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:09:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/274463"><b>UPEngineer</b></A> : Brendan,<br><br>Whatever you all did seems to work. So far so good!<br><br>I have been impressed with your service so far and I know there are going to be some glitches here and there but you guys seem generally concerned and receptive to everyone that posts here.<br><br>I mean how many "Big Cahunas" are up at 3 in the morning asking about some changes made to their service and if it works or not?<br><br>I'm impressed and looking forward to more additions and features!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563767</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:02:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : Good to hear, thats what we were expecting.  Hopefully we'll see others getting the same results.  If the device is being provisioned by us, a simple reboot of the device should switch it to the correct settings if it has not been done already.<br><br>-Brendan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563763</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:58:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563741</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/274463"><b>UPEngineer</b></A> : So far it seems to work...in fact, my pap2 was already set to inband instead of auto.  So far so good, I can get into my voicemail and I can get into my automated caller at work too with no problems!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563741</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:50:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563474</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : Someone set their adapter to 'inband' and give our vmail system & then remote stuff a shot when you get a chance, and post the results here or PM them to me.<br><br>-Brendan<br><SMALL>--<br>ViaTalk BroadBand Phone Service Behind The Scenes: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.VTInside.com" >www.VTInside.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563474</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:29:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563445</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/628818"><b>TampaVoIP</b></A> : Hmm... using a non-Viatalk PAP2 with Viatalk SIP credentials in it and haven't had a DTMF issue with VT. Is there anyone who is using a NON VT-issued adapter and has this issue?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563445</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:23:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563441</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : Anyone still awake who wants to test out a fix on this?<br><br>-Brendan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16563441</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:22:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562570</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/889832"><b>NoVaVoiper</b></A> : I'll echo the comments that auto is not working and I've had a ticket open for months on this.  The last change was supposed to fix the problem, but while it may have helped the detection of the "#" key, there is still a problem with unclear tones in "Auto" mode.  I am currently using the inband workaround mentioned above (thanks poolek) and am content, but there is a problem with the system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562570</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:40:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562505</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1246970"><b>bd23</b></A> : The PAP2 is not the problem.. It will do the same thing with any other ATA.  For some reason, Asterisk (which Viatalk uses) will not recognize the tones when using inband when dialing directly to voicemail (no trunk).  However, for DTMF to work properly on Viatalk when using a trunk, you need to use inband.  So really, the only way right now is to set your device to inband and call your phone number and press * to get your voicemail.<br><br>Every Asterisk system I have used does this same thing... Very annoying as inband is used by a lot of providers.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562505</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:30:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562132</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/911142"><b>guppy_fish</b></A> : The PAP2 is a very poor adapter, mine hums unless I short the second phone port and now it seems the auto DTMF could be the cause of the double tones is the actual adapter. Nice how We have to dig up this info and no, its not THIS adapter I have, its the model ( PAP2 ) as it has been swapped out.<br><br>ViaTalk, are you listening? ... since most of us have this adapter ( you sent it ) and we must use inband, we need YOUR voice mail to work with inband.<br><br>Brendan ... can we make this any simpler for you to fix?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16562132</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:28:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16561437</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1136753"><b>stevech1</b></A> : Re INBAND DTMF and double-digit-detection (push some number and the far end IVR thinks it was pushed 2+ times in a row)...<br><br>I read on other forums that the PAP2 has new chipsets and may fix the design problem in the PAPs for In-Band. Or not. <br><br>The ATA (all of them I suppose) tries to detect DTMF from the attached phone. As soon as the tone-pair (a digit) is detected, the ATA tries to suppress the tones from going forward, in-band, that is, it tries to squelch the tones. Having detected the DTMF, the ATA should generate the equivalent SIP signalling (digital message) and that's all that there is to it. Correctly reacting the the arriving SIP signalling is the responsibility of the VoIP provider's system. I suppose it would convert the SIP message to SS7 messaging if the connection uses that kind of trunk (public switched telephone system) or leave it SIP, or whatever, according to the gateway's connection for this call. <br><br>As I understand, using INBAND,  the phone's DTMF is passed on down the voice circuit "inband" rather than being squelched and converted to SIP. It is possible that some ATAs try to squelch the phone's tone and replace it with the same tones but created by the ATA itself, rather than the phone. And the ATA's tones would be at a well defined level and of a fixed duration (perhaps shorter than the button-pushed-time on the phone). <br><br>What I think I read is that the PAP (version 1?) and TBD on PAP2s, in squelching the DTMF from the phone, let a bit of that tone pass by before squelching. Then there's a brief quiet time, then the tones appear again - created this time by either the ATA itself (inband case) or by the switching system (SIP-to-SS7 message case). The brief gap causes the far end IVR to sense two successive tone bursts.<br><br>Another problem with a different root cause, that I and others have noticed, is that the DTMF tones as heard by the far end are grossly distorted, having been created incorrectly by the ATA and/or the VT switching system depending on the inband mode.<br><br>Or I'm all wrong. In which case, sorry, ignore this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16561437</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:30:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16557254</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : For me, If I call VT's Priority support number enter 2 then enter 4 it prompts for my VT Phone number. It always says that is not a valid number. Also if I try and use VoiceMail from home, It accepts the *123 but then fails when I try and enter my password. This is when it is set to AUTO. My bank says account number is invalid. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16557254</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:43:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16557016</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/501473"><b>Hooper</b></A> : Can someone post a number that they are having problems with? I have a couple different devices I can test with. I have never heard the double dtmf issue or had any problems with dtmf on VT. Not to say I haven't had this problem with other providers like VP, LiveVoip etc.<br><br>One of the devices I have is a stock PAP2 running 3.1.9 FW in Xmit=Auto mode from VT on a new account. Another is a SPA-2000, 3000, and 1000. Obviously these aren't all connected right now, but can easily be setup.<br><br>1-800-PICK-UPS has always been a problematic number for me. How about you all?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16557016</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556491</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894853"><b>poolek</b></A> : I submitted a ticket over a week ago (IBU-59585) and haven't received any response yet.  With the work-around I found for VM access though, I can leave my adaptor set to 'INBAND' and access all IVRs just fine.<br><br>This would be easier if VT Voicemail recognized inband DTMF without having to use a workaround.  Either that, or figure out why the duplication is occuring and fix the root cause.  <br><br>Like guppy_fish said, it's easy to replicate - just set the adaptor to 'auto' and call your cell phone and listen to the tones.  The are obviously being duplicated. Or just call the number I listed as an example in my Ticket and listen to it read back the duplicate codes.   <br><br>This duplication has gotten much more consistent since the system was adjusted a week or two ago.  Inband solves the problem for every system I've tried with the single exception of VT VM.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556491</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:31:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556478</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : I am a certified ViaTalk supporter. The features and price IMHO are the best. My only complaint is that the story I (we) get from VT tech support is not always consistent. Some tech's say "It's a known issue and we are working on it" Some act as if they have not heard of the issue and spend a lot of time trying to solve it for the customer. It would seem to me that AUTO is Viatalks preferred DTMF Xmit method. But we as users are finding that INBAND is what works (Except VT Voicemail). VTBrendan, why can't you setup VT's Voicemail to accept INBAND? The Codec that is used by VT is about the best (At the cost of high bandwidth) quality Codec and this is shown to be true by the use of INBAND as the method we the customers have found to work. What we need here is a quick poll. If you use the AUTO mode and it works, Please let us know. Maybe the problem is restricted to just a few users. IF so, then I am willing to be patient. If not, then lets get working on a fix and make sure all VT's tech support staff are on the same page.<br><br>Bill B]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556478</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 22:29:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556178</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/911142"><b>guppy_fish</b></A> : VTBrendan,<br><br>With all due respect, your DTMF is busted ... No if and or butts about it.<br><br>For us VT users, we stick with "inband" because that's what works with the untold millions of places we call. We have NO issues with using inband unless we use VT voice mail. It only works on without "Inband". Auto doesn't work with my clients Voice mail system and we have ten's of people who take the time to post about the double tones.<br><br>I have been a very positive supporter of VT, the service and your support have been great, but this issue hasn't made any progress, none, zip, nada ... The issue is not DTMF ( we all can use inband thankyou ), it is your inhouse voice mail needing anything but inband to work<br><br>I had assumed you knew it was still fubar'ed and were working inhouse to resolve. <br><br>If you still have doubts, or think I'm just a noisy or pushy VT user, use your own service, call a cell phone and listen for yourself on the double tones when Auto is selected.<br><br>For me, I just don't use your Voice Mail and have "in Band selected". When the day comes you have a perminate fix, I'll switch back to auto<br><br>I am sorry if this post is a bit rough. My intent was for you to understand it has NEVER worked and still doesn't. Most of us just give up. I for one have many other things to do than worry if all my features work.<br><br>Best Regards]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16556178</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 21:32:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/274463"><b>UPEngineer</b></A> : I submitted a trouble ticket on July 14th in regards to my dmtf tones on my line not working properly.  They were working fine until that time so I don't know what changed.  Anyways, I received the following reply shortly after submitting the ticket:<br><br>"We are working on this issue and expect a resolution soon. <br><br>Karen L Harvey<br>ViaTalk Support"<br><br>The issues still exists and I submitted another follow up ticket with what VTBrendan said to do.<br><br>Let's see if it can get resolved!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555555</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:48:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : Bank of America's IVR doubles the DTMF tones, but GMAC works fine...interesting.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555542</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:45:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555393</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1225374"><b>VTBrendan</b></A> : The proper setting for DTMF of your device, is auto.  If you are having issues once set to this setting, give our tech support staff a call and have them work with you on this.  If you continue to have issues, submit a ticket and ask to have it sent to the attention of iain whom will be able to troubleshoot any issues you are having.<br><br>-Brendan]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555393</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 19:18:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555182</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1136753"><b>stevech1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  bbrookfield <A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>...My bank and Credit card did not get the numbers right all the time (About 60% I would Guess). I have reset back to INBAND and will only change it when I need to call for Voice Mail. <br> </DIV>Let's see:<br>Bank's IVR: no workie<br>Credit Card Co. IVR: no workie<br><br>"... will only change it [to/from INBAND] when I need to call for Voice Mail"<br><br>Now that will be convenient for the family members!<br><br>Tolerance is a virtue!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16555182</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:43:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : Hey, That is a GREAT idea!!!.  Now the only thing that may be an issue is the Custom Calling Features. I will try them all and report back. If this works, I will request the my Default Config be set to INBAND.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553987</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:52:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553757</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894853"><b>poolek</b></A> : Well, typing that response made me think to try something, and it works!<br><br>Set your adaptor to INBAND, but instead of dialing *123 to get to your voicemail, dial your full VT phone number and press '*' to get the password prompt.  INBAND works just fine there!  I guess that side of the VT VM system is 'listening' for DTMF.<br><br>That means I can just reprogram my VM button on my phone to access the VM system using this method and leave the DTFM set to INBAND.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553757</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:17:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553708</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/894853"><b>poolek</b></A> : I'm not an expert on this stuff, so what I say may be wrong - but this is what I understand from reading stuff...<br><br>When you press a button on the phone, it generates the DTMF tone that is sent to the PAP2.  <br><br>If you have INBAND, nothing is done.  The PAP2 passes the DTMF tone through the codec just like any other sound.  This tends to work ok with high quality codecs.  With codecs that use more compression, the DTMF sound ends up being too distorted to work.<br><br>If you have one of the out-of-band options set, the PAP2 recognizes the DTMF tone and sends a signal outside of the codec that indicates which button was pressed.  Somewhere on the VOIP server side, the system gets this code then regenerates the DTMF code.  This prevents the compression from the codec from messing up the DTMF sound.  Somewhere in there, the DTMF sound that's generated by the phone itself is supposed to be muted.  I don't know if that occurs at the adaptor or server-side.  Where ever it occurs, that's where VT's implementation fails.  The first DTMF tone you hear is from your phone handset.  The second is the regeneration from VT's server.  <br><br>I would -guess- that VT VM system isn't 'listening' for DTMF codes, instead it's looking for the out-of-band signals.  That's why it doesn't work when you set the adaptor to 'INBAND'.  Every other IVR out there would just listen for the tones since they wouldn't have access to the out of band stuff.  So, INBAND works with everything else because it doesn't introduce duplication due to the lack of muting, and the codec VT uses is high enough quality to accurately replicate the tone.  <br><br>Theoretically, you could access VT voicemail with INBAND if you're calling in from any VOIP other provider because VT's voicemail interface to the 'outside' world would be listening for DTMF, not looking for the out of band stuff.  It just doesn't work when you're calling from your own VT line. <br><br>FWIW - I have the updated firmware and still have issues with DTMF.  I firmly believe I'll continued to have issues until the muting issue is resolved (don't know if that's a VT issue or a PAP2 issue), or VT changes their VM to also listen for INBAND DTMF.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16553708</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:06:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16552944</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : Well, not so good as I thought. The Auto setting for DTMF is better then before, but not as good as INBAND. My bank and Credit card did not get the numbers right all the time (About 60% I would Guess). I have reset back to INBAND and will only change it when I need to call for Voice Mail. On a positive note, My wife and I do believe that the call Sound quality is a wee-bit better then before the Firmware upgrade. Funny thing is that in Auto, I get the tone when I press down a digit and get it again when I release the digit (Very short tone each time). In INBAND mode, the tone stays on as long as I hold the button down. Anyone have any tech explanations on what the difference between INBAND and AUTO mode is. INBAND seems more like a typical POTS phone, at least that is how it sounds when I call my Cell and listen as I press different numbers. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16552944</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 11:53:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: [ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16552141</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1173383"><b>ptrowski</b></A> : Good work bbrookfield!  Let us know how it goes please.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16552141</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:00:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>[ViaTalk] Partial fix for DTMF issue</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16551108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/878993"><b>bbrookfield</b></A> : I like a few other users have been having the problem with DTMF (Touch tones) do not work with outside systems when the XMit method is AUTO. When I change XMit method to INBAND, everything EXCEPT VT Voicemail works. Well tonight I upgraded the PAP2 firmware to 3.1.12(LS) and reset a my Line 1 setting for XMit method to AUTO, REGIONAL settings DTMF Playback Length to .1 and DTMF Playback level to -16. Now my DTMF is working a lot better. I still hear 2 separate touch tones when I call my Cell, but the ViaTalk Voicemail now works as well as my bank when in Auto Mode. I can even call VT Tech support and use the Priority support option (2 - 4 - 1999-555-1234) . I still think that it should not have 2 tones for each number press, but it does seem to work. Also noted that my calls seem cleaner (Less noise) then before. I will wait a couple of days before I get my hopes up too much, Just wanted to pass this along.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16551108</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 00:50:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
