 dslwanterIt's comingPremium
join:2002-12-16
Niles, OH
 ·AT&T Midwest
1 edit | How about... ...the FCC take charge on companies like AT&T for totally sending project pronto down the pooper? If they're really concerned about broadband they'll take this analysis and shove it up some asses to get broadband available to every US household. By Broadband, I don't mean Hughesnet, that in my book isn't broadband it's just dial-up on steroids.
EDIT: And commenting on the zip code thing that is B.S. Most of my zip code,44436, is covered by Adelphia cable and a very small slither by Armstrong cable. Then about a quarter of us stuck with Rapid Cable who has yet to upgrade the system. And most of the people stuck with Rapid Cable are out of range for DSL because AT&T is too damn cheap to upgrade the RT on New Castle Rd. which would solve that problem. I say most because probably about 10 houses right when Adelphia ends still qualify for DSL, though service is unreliable due to distance.
--
"Whatsoever you do to the least of my people, that you do onto me!" Check out my internet radio station: »www.thebomb102.com |
Sammer
join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
1 edit | Should we even mention that the FCC is meeting the letter but not the spirit of the law by releasing these bogus reports. "Lies, d@m^ lies, and statistics" |
