<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>BPL is Dead in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16615468</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:30:19 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 20:30:19 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: BPL is Dead</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16626695</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/810895"><b>W1RFI</b></A> : Actually, to my knowledge, no fines have been issued. In one system - the Main.net system operating in Manassas, VA, the FCC ordered the BPL operator to do testing to determine if was operating within the FCC limits. That testing probably cost tens of thousands of dollars, but there has been no fine issued.<br><br>Ed Hare, W1RFI<br>ARRL Laboratory Manager<br>225 Main St<br>Newington, CT 06111<br>Tel: 860-594-0318<br>email: w1rfi@arrl.org<br>Note to moderator - My contact info is public, so no need to protect it from the spambots.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16626695</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 06:15:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>BPL is Dead</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16615468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/927346"><b>Tzale</b></A> : What's funny is that BPL providers who aren't complying with the no interference rule are being fined tens of thousands of dollars by the FCC from reports filed by Amateur Radio operators who are reporting them.<br><br>-Tzale]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16615468</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:57:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
