| reply to pabster
Re: Of course they don't identify the crook properly... Liberal or Conservative, when you're wrong you're wrong. Just because liberals are wrong less, doesn't mean the media is biased.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
| wow.. notice how all those companies SUCK. |
|
 bigunkGort, Klattu Birada Nikto
join:2001-02-10
USA | reply to canesfan2001
That would be a good statement if liberals were indeed wrong less. That not being the case shows, among other things, that the media is very biased. The liberal media refuses to deal with facts and chooses only to advance the leftist agenda. Period.
On the other hand, conservative media is engaged in a constant battle for market share to expose the facts that liberals choose to ignore because said facts do not serve to advance the leftist cause.
Conservatives and liberals make mistakes every day. Conservatives admit it more than do liberals. My guess here is you feel liberals are wrong less because they don't admit to their errors as much as conservatives.
Liberals also seem to feel that any conservative media is an intrusion on "their" exclusive space. That is not debatable.
Have a nice day...
--
Televideo ergo sum.....I watch TV, therefore I am. |
|
|
|
2 edits | What facts do these "liberal media" outlets ignore?
Let's face it, most media outlets are owned by the same large corporations that contribute billions to Conservative candidates.
How is it in the best interest of those companies to promote the liberal agenda?
EDIT- I was a bit ill-tempered a minute ago...and exaggerated a little. Millions...but still...
--
OASAASLLS |
|
bigunkGort, Klattu Birada Nikto
join:2001-02-10
USA | Have proof of the companies and their contributions? Also, smart money dictates that contributions are made to both sides. One needs to buy favor no matter who is in power. But while we're on the subject of facts, let's take one nice story in the liberal media that caused heads to roll. Remember the Dan Rather piece where he torpedoed Bush without facts on his side, and when the facts were known, he still refused to budge until he was backed into a corner? That is but one of myriad examples.
So tag, you're it.
--
Televideo ergo sum.....I watch TV, therefore I am. |
|
| Search google yourself if you want proof. "campaign contributions"
If you want to start lumping all media in with one man.
Bill O'Rielly. Bigot.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
bigunkGort, Klattu Birada Nikto
join:2001-02-10
USA | Ahh yes. Typical liberal response. Don't bother addressing the facts, but resort to name calling. You are so predictable. This is my point. You degenerate the conversation to name calling and muddying the waters whenever facts are presented. Pitiful. Have a nice life.
--
Televideo ergo sum.....I watch TV, therefore I am. |
|
| At this point not only was I simply playing your game. But your response contradicts itself.
"typical liberal response"?
I call it like I see it.
On that note, I'm not liberal. I'm actually fairly conservative. But I'll be damned if I go along with this Conservative zealot crap.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
bigunkGort, Klattu Birada Nikto
join:2001-02-10
USA | Interesting how you appear to change sides. I say appear because I too call it as I see it. Now, having seen you say you are conservative, I might be inclined to change my opinion of you.
I do not like what Bush is doing to our country, and I voted for him, thinking him to be the lesser of two evils. I still think that, but the margin is getting way too close to call. This country is going to hell in a handbasket and the wrong people have way too much power.
Our governor Arnold said a couple of things lately and I called his office and blasted a hole through him. Bottom line...we live in a representative republic, where we elect to office those who are supposed to vote their constituencies (sp?). I let Arnold know in no uncertain terms that he is to vote as we say, period, or he is out just like Davis got the boot.
I would blast Bush in exactly the same way. He is to vote and act as we say. He works for us, not the other way around. All politicians do. Those who disobey their marching orders must go.
O'Reilly a bigot? I think not. Just another guy who calls it as he sees it. Yeah, he riles some people, but so what? People are strong, they can take it. Those that can't should learn how. This nation is full of panty-waist weaklings who do nothing more than cry "poor me" when something doesn't go their way. I, for one, am sick of it. I will attack anyone who pulls these weak-manipulator games at the time and place of my choosing. Not physical, mind you, but written, verifiable, and provable.
Wow...did I really write all that?
--
Televideo ergo sum.....I watch TV, therefore I am. |
|
