 danclan
join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA | say what? they ought to check with some fios customers who blow by 100GB monthly with regularity and dont blink an eye....(neither does verizon)... |
|
| /retsam hugs his 20 meg fios connection.... |
|
roady1
join:2003-11-13
Cleveland, OH | Dude... For $100 a month I want statics....five of 'em |
|
|
|
| reply to danclan
Re: say what? Charter might be lagging behind at 5m/512k, but atleast there is no bandwith cap. |
|
yabos
join:2003-02-16
London, ON | reply to danclan
Rogers serves in Canada and competes with Bell, not Verizon. |
|
 DaMaGeINCThe Lan ManPremium
join:2002-06-08
Greenville, SC
kudos:2 | reply to metachronos
said by metachronos:Charter might be lagging behind at 5m/512k, but atleast there is no bandwith cap. Charter is at 10m/1m now. FYI |
|
| Tw here still 5m/384 here...lol they are way behind..
Tw get with the program here!!!! PLEASE.. |
|
| reply to danclan
We are not talking about people that do massive downloads of porn, P2P, Kazaa, etc.
I am an above average user and may use 50-60 gigs a month.
If just wacthing video online, sending pics, email, and surfing, 100 gigs is fine.
I do know "hogs" that use 1 tb a month. Yes, I think they should pay MORE. How? Running P2P. Basically, illegal downloading and uploading is what they are doing.
I'd say cap at 100 gigs then charge $.25 a gig after that.
FIOS shouldn't apply since they want you to download with 30/5 connections.
If you don't want to pay by the gig, get a commercial account. No caps on those. |
|
