<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Need suggestions for panel type antennaes in Wireless Service Providers</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16678416</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:18:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:18:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16714604</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Chele <A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I was uncomfortable with the amount of apparent stress on the antenna's connector and the coax.  The antennas I am referring to don't have much space between the connector and the post and it just seems like too much strain.<br> </DIV>These panel antennas appear to have sufficient clearance on the centerline to accept LMR-400 sized cables with little (if any) stress on the connector.<br><br>This is the 13 dB panel...the 16 dB panel connector is offset from the centerline.<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16714604?c=1050561&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjY3ODQxNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="182326 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1050561.thumb600~74b039e8441a89883c2346f6db625ac7/PANEL_ANTENNA_13_COAX_LMR400_01.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>LMR-400 on Panel Antenna</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16714604</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:39:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16709946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875582"><b>Keithb</b></A> : No more of a pain than the rest of us.  lol<br><br>It's just a matter of 4 plastic screws to attach it to the hinged door, hook up the jumper, IF you are using the 2300 enclosure?<br><br>Or did you purchase the newer ones with the new enclosure and just the board?  If so, I'm not sure how you'd add it to them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16709946</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 09:08:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16709209</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/842769"><b>Diddy1</b></A> : I didn't think about that. Perhaps I will do just that. Is it easy to install the antennas into the enclosures? I try not to bother them too much cause I've been somewhat a pain in their rear so far :)<br>Aaron]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16709209</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:44:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16708466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875582"><b>Keithb</b></A> : Aaron, call Caleb and ask if you can just purchase the antennas as a separate unit.  I'm sure they might work a deal with you on that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16708466</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 23:38:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16708058</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/842769"><b>Diddy1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  jdmarti1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1024542"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Curious question - if you are using a 23xx - why not just buy the unit with the integrated 14dbi antenna?  We use them on dish mounts regularly.<br> </DIV>I wish I would have done this to begin with. I didn't intend on so many folks so close to the APs.<br>Aaron]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16708058</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 22:42:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16696005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><b>Chele</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  LLigetfa <A HREF="/useremail/u/1358053"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I don't see any issue with it.  There is no reason whatsoever to have to bend the coax to a tight radius and confine the bend between the connector and the mast.  Let the coax go beyond the mast perpendicular to it, then loop beyond in a P to gently curve back to become parallel to the mast.  You can even fix it to the mast where it crosses at right angles to strain relieve the connector.<br> </DIV>I was uncomfortable with the amount of apparent stress on the antenna's connector and the coax.  The antennas I am referring to don't have much space between the connector and the post and it just seems like too much strain.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16696005</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:41:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16688473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1024542"><b>jdmarti1</b></A> : Curious question - if you are using a 23xx - why not just buy the unit with the integrated 14dbi antenna?  We use them on dish mounts regularly.<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://magicwisp.com" >magicwisp.com</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16688473</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:01:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1358053"><b>LLigetfa</b></A> : I don't see any issue with it.  THere is no reason whatsoever to have to bend the coax to a tight radius and confine the bend between the connector and the mast.  Let the coax go beyond the mast perpendicular to it, then loop beyond in a P to gently curve back to become parallel to the mast.  You can even fix it to the mast where it crosses at right angles to strain relieve the connector.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686179</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:48:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1249536"><b>PersComp</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Chele <A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>"I never learned anything from those that agreed with me!"<br> </DIV>I like it!!  ;)<br><br>Also, you never truly know what is te right way to do something until you have screwed it up every way possible!<br><SMALL>--<br>Are these instructions or corrections???</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686001</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 07:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684984</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><b>Chele</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  superdog <A HREF="/useremail/u/429429"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"> </DIV>Not to be argumentative :), but I have used units like the one pictured, and LMR400 will bend enough to allow the use of that antenna. You have to be VERY CAREFUL when making it bend over and conform, but it is not a hard enough radius to "kink" the copper conductor. :uhh:<br> </DIV>Not at all, it's just that I am a wuz.  I just don't like the amount of stress on the antenna's connector and the LMR itself.  If I can't mount that antenna at the very top of the post, I rather install a different antenna altogether.  <br><br>Please, always feel free to correct me.  Someone used to use this for his signature "I never learned anything from those that agreed with me!"  Or something to that effect.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684984</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:56:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/979565"><b>gunther_01</b></A> : Our 19db panel from pac uses that same aluminum heavy bracket,  It is a nice and sturdy but kinda large for some locations antenna.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680237</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:26:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679998</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/429429"><b>superdog</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Chele <A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Keep in mind that the antenna on the left will give you problems if you are using LMR400(not the Ultraflex type).  <br> </DIV>Not to be argumentative :), but I have used units like the one pictured, and LMR400 will bend enough to allow the use of that antenna. You have to be VERY CAREFUL when making it bend over and conform, but it is not a hard enough radius to "kink" the copper conductor. :uhh:<br><SMALL>--<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wavecrazy.net" >www.wavecrazy.net</A> Join WISPA today! &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.wispa.org/" >www.wispa.org/</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679998</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:40:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679944</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/845280"><b>Chele</b></A> : Keep in mind that the antenna on the left will give you problems if you are using LMR400(not the Ultraflex type).  There is not much room to bend/flex the cable between the antenna and the post.  The antenna has to be mounted at the very top of the post, which is not always possible or the most convenient spot.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679944</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:30:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678668</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/842769"><b>Diddy1</b></A> : Excellent, these look like what I'm looking for. 16db should be well more than I would need :) Thank you for the reply!<br>Aaron]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678668</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:14:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678627</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1085764"><b>John Galt</b></A> : Here are two that I use (shown on my testing jig):<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.highgainantennas.com/13dBi_Panel_Antenna_p/hga24-13.htm" >www.highgainantennas.com/13dBi_P&middot;&middot;&middot;4-13.htm</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.pacwireless.com/products/PA24_Data_Sheet.pdf" >www.pacwireless.com/products/PA2&middot;&middot;&middot;heet.pdf</A><br><br>They are very lightweight but well constructed. The 16 dB panel came with a galvanized bracket rather than the aluminum one listed, but it is very heavy duty...<br><br>Quality construction, lightweight, visually pleasing, good performance...two thumbs up.<br><SMALL>--<br>A is A</SMALL><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16678627?c=1048084&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjY3ODQxNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="4335103 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1048084.thumb600~1c2caf8e8b57d4fc0d50179a8abcad71/PANEL_ANTENNA_13_DB_01.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>13 dB Panel Antenna</TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#000000 nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/16678627?c=1048085&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IxNjY3ODQxNi54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="4133875 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1048085.thumb600~599b53266b78cddef8390d6b8a4013d0/PANEL_ANTENNA_16_DB_01.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A><br>16 dB Panel Antenna</TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678627</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 02:02:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Need suggestions for panel type antennaes</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678416</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/842769"><b>Diddy1</b></A> : I have been using panel antennas for clients withing closer range of APs. However, I've decided that old dish mounts really work great for CPE. But, the drawback is that the arms are too short to fit a radio(DLB-2300 type) and a standard panel antennae. The antennaes I've been using have a top and bottom mount. I've only been using the bottom mount so the antennae extends past the length of the arm. This would be fine but the antenna tends to droop downwards at the top causing the whole antenna to aim downwards. This works for very close installs but obviously doesn't work for more distant sites. Is there a panel type antenna that mounts with one (1) bracket? I realize I can get longer arms on the DSS mounts, but I have access to a mess of these and wanted to take advantage of that.<br>Thanks,<br>Aaron]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678416</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 01:09:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
