<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista??? in Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16678975</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:00:43 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:00:43 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686327</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1290198"><b>elios</b></A> : Martinus <br>Vista asumes you have only one HDD with one partaion as most lower end PCs have<br>Vistas adviser and system test stuff is flawed ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686327</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:26:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686185</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/570051"><b>novaflare</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Kilroy <A HREF="/useremail/u/724762"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  floydb_1982 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>So your saying that 5,400 RPM is just as fast as 7,200 RPM???</DIV>It depends on what you're using it for.  For short reads and writes that isn't any real difference.  Where you'll see the difference is in long reads and writes.  After you're booted odds are you won't notice the difference.  Most laptop drives are 5,400 RPM.<br> </DIV>Ive had both in fact still do have both. You can tell the difference any time your computer is making use of the swap file. A large part of windows on my comp for example runs in virt mem aka swap file. But many programs will also make use of the swap even when you have more than enough ram to not use swap file. Then theres the fact that as you can tell many people are in to digital imaging (just need to look at the forum here for digital imaging). 3d art is another place where hd speed will help. DVD encoding ripping cds and mp3 encoding etc.<br><br>I suppose if all your doing is  web and email chat etc then no you will not notice. But that is only a few % of the population.<br><SMALL>--<br>Evil does exist and it has a face to often that face is one that should look on their child with love in their eyes.<br><br>Instead only hate exists in those eyes.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16686185</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:49:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684238</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/170109"><b>CylonRed</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/capable.mspx" >www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/g&middot;&middot;&middot;ble.mspx</A> - same place as the links already provided...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684238</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:41:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : So tell me what are the system requirement for Windows Vista???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684168</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:30:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684073</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/612933"><b>Chizep</b></A> : Yes, use the effin' advisor to answer all of your questions!!!<br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Octavean <A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Vista Premium Ready PC OS install HDDs must be 40GB or larger (15 GB free space) as a minimum requirement. <br><br>Perhaps you should run the <A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/default.mspx"> &#147; Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor Beta &#147; </A> and perhaps do a little research over at the official Vista Home page. No offence intended but the info is just there for the taking,&#133;.no need to ask. <br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16684073</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 21:18:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SLOW...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/520600"><b>signmeuptoo</b></A> : floyd, you will find that many, if not most of us, have at least 2 actual hard drives.  The reason:  One drive serves as the host for the bootup/OSs, the other for files that we want to keep between installs, because you don't have to reformat such a second drive for it to work with a fresh install, at least not until FAT/NTFS is abandoned, that is...<br><SMALL>--<br>Let's be nice to each other, k?  Life's too short.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 19:41:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SLOW...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683149</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : I use Windows XP SP2. I have the Western Digital hard drive format software that came with my 200 GB HD. But here's the bad part of having Windows XP SP2 format your HD in to a single drive is that if you ever have to install Windows XP again and when you boot up Windows XP right after the install the HD will go from 200 GB to 137 GB and when that happens any data on the HD is gone and lost forever. So that is why I split my HD to 2 100 GB HD's.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683149</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:37:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SLOW...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683080</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/520600"><b>signmeuptoo</b></A> : Floyd:  What service pack did she have of Windows?  You need to be fairly current to run at the larger size.  Nevertheless, partitioning a hard drive is often a good idea, that way if data on one partition gets borked, the other partitions might still retain integrity.<br><SMALL>--<br>Let's be nice to each other, k?  Life's too short.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683080</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:28:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: SLOW...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : The maximum hard drive space my mother can support is 137 GB. I did not know that until I had installed the 200 GB hard drive. I ended up splitting it in to 2 100 GB hard drives.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16683029</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 18:18:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682068</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><b>Octavean</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by asdfdfdf :</SMALL><HR> At this point floydb no one should be in the market for upgrades in preparation for vista. It continues to be delayed. <br><br>Wait until it is released and then base your decisions on the actual performance levels of the final code. Then you can upgrade as you need to at the best price available at the time. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Basically, I agree with this sentiment. However, if floydb_1982 wishes to run a Vista beta build now it is something of a concern now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16682068</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:53:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681601</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : At this point floydb no one should be in the market for upgrades in preparation for vista. It continues to be delayed. <br><br>Wait until it is released and then base your decisions on the actual performance levels of the final code. Then you can upgrade as you need to at the best price available at the time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681601</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:49:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>SLOW...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681307</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/150929"><b>Jerm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  floydb_1982 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>1) Maxtor DimondMax 16<br>Formatted capacity: 120 GB<br>Average seek time: &iexcl;&Uuml;12.6 ms<br>Rotational speed: 5,400 RPM<br>2MB cache buffer<br><br> </DIV>I have that exact same Maxtor you list - and its dog slow for speed.  Its one of the very first 120GB drives, and performs more like an old 40GB  :(<br><br>Go pick up a perpendicular SATA 320GB for $90 @ newegg and the speed difference will be amazing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681307</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:09:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><b>Octavean</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Martinus :</SMALL><HR> That's probably based on MS's assumption that you will have your page file and your temp dirs in your system drive - that's the standard setup and few people change that -.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I was under the impression that the 40GB/15GB free reference was for installation purposes not necessarily a daily operating environment but I wouldn&#146;t bet the farm on that. Today I wouldn&#146;t typically run a 40GB HDD instead opting for 120GB and above.  <br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Martinus :</SMALL><HR> Now, I have not installed Vista, but since the times of W2K and later on XP, I always move the page file to the first partition of a fast second HD. Temp dirs also go there. I hope - actually, I guess - you can do that in Vista too. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I have run windows XP in such a configuration before but haven&#146;t tried it in Vista. <br><br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>said by Martinus :</SMALL><HR> I really don't think having 15 GB or 5 GB free on your system partition will make any difference in performance. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>I wouldn&#146;t bother making much of a distinction between 15GB and 5GB free space, I&#146;m certain that I wouldn&#146;t want to run with either if it could be helped.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681164</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:50:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/445404"><b>Martinus</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Octavean <A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I don&#146;t doubt that, that&#146;s why for specificity I stated &#147;Vista Premium&#148; with respect to 40GB or larger (15 GB free space) according to MS. </DIV>That's probably based on MS's assumption that you will have your page file and your temp dirs in your system drive - that's the standard setup and few people change that -.<br><br>Now, I have not installed Vista, but since the times of W2K and later on XP, I always move the page file to the first partition of a fast second HD. Temp dirs also go there. I hope - actually, I guess - you can do that in Vista too.<br><br>I really don't think having 15 GB or 5 GB free on your system partition will make any difference in performance.<br><br>Edit: According to the MS Vista advisor, you'll probably get a higher score with a 5400 RPM Maxtor with 50 GB free space than with a 10.000 RPM Raptor with 5 GB free space. That sounds strange to me.<br><br><SMALL>--<br>From the GSV "Ethics Gradient"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680942</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 13:13:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680863</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><b>Octavean</b></A> : I don&#146;t doubt that, that&#146;s why for specificity I stated &#147;Vista Premium&#148; with respect to 40GB or larger (15 GB free space) according to MS.<br><br>Vista core or Vista Capable differs somewhat from Vista Premium. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680863</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:59:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680789</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/828023"><b>Luko</b></A> : Vista has been installed on a 20gig drive. Least the Beta 2 public release fit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680789</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:49:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680660</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/520600"><b>signmeuptoo</b></A> : No, I am saying until you can speak with full authority on things, just be careful making blanket statements.<br><SMALL>--<br>Let's be nice to each other, k?  Life's too short.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680660</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:28:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680522</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/358548"><b>Octavean</b></A> : Vista Premium Ready PC OS install HDDs must be 40GB or larger (15 GB free space) as a minimum requirement. <br><br>Perhaps you should run the <A HREF="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/getready/default.mspx"> &#147; Windows Vista Upgrade Advisor Beta &#147; </A> and perhaps do a little research over at the official Vista Home page. No offence intended but the info is just there for the taking,&#133;.no need to ask. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680522</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 12:08:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680405</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/179706"><b>ccallana</b></A> : To answer most questions - <br><br>If you are upgrading to Vista - if you didn't purchase your computer within the last year or 2, I would consider an upgrade.<br><br>Its a serious resource hog, especially if you want to use their "best" new UI.  For the most part, even a 5 year old CPU will probably be fine, but a system of that vintage is unlikely to have enough memory, or a fast enough video card.  <br><SMALL>--<br>Who is more irrational, the man who believes in a God he can't see, or the man who is offended by the God he doesn't believe in? - Brad Stine</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680405</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:49:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680128</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214879"><b>brut7</b></A> : Speed is everything. My computer runs fine under both xp and vista (currently 5472) but I know how to tweak vista. I use two 7200 rpm sata 3.0 drives in RAID 0.  Used to use two 10000 rpm raptors but needed more space and cost was a factor.<br><br>Hard drive speed is the number one factor. Of course a duel cpu setup, shotgun ram and duel vid cards help a bit.<br><br>I overclock too but shoot for stability and know what I'm doing.<br><br>Horsepower is; what it is.<br><br>Slow computers are slow, fast computers are fast. <br><br>I want my appz and browsers to spring into life the moment I click on an icon. <br><br>Fast hardware works great on an OS.<br><br>Best Wishes<br><br>PS Some will not agree with my viewpoint but it really doesn't cost much to stay close to the leading edge.<br><br>If your spending time on a computer, make the most of it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16680128</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:06:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679444</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/170109"><b>CylonRed</b></A> : All of them are big enough - Vista does not care about the speed of the drive - that is up to you...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679444</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 08:53:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679118</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : I'm turning my 300 GB USB hard drive in to one huge Windows Media Audio library database]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679118</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:49:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679101</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/724762"><b>Kilroy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  floydb_1982 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>So your saying that 5,400 RPM is just as fast as 7,200 RPM???</DIV>It depends on what you're using it for.  For short reads and writes that isn't any real difference.  Where you'll see the difference is in long reads and writes.  After you're booted odds are you won't notice the difference.  Most laptop drives are 5,400 RPM.<br><SMALL>--<br>The most ineffective workers are systematically moved to the place where they can do the least damage: Management. - Hence I'll always be Head Peon In Charge.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679101</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:41:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679051</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : So your saying that 5,400 RPM is just as fast as 7,200 RPM???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679051</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 06:11:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679032</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/520600"><b>signmeuptoo</b></A> : floyd, don't get into something you don't want to get in an argument about if your not that knowledgable.  RPM is part of what makes a HD fast, but there are numerous factors.<br><br>There are 15,000RPM drives out there, heck, there might even be 20K RPM drives by now for all I know, but they are probably just SCSI drives.<br><SMALL>--<br>Let's be nice to each other, k?  Life's too short.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679032</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:55:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679027</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : Before 7,200 RPM 5,400 RPM was king of the road]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679027</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:48:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679018</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Have you ever tested a 5400RPM drive next to a 7200RPM?  The difference is like night and day.  Access times, sustained transfer, burst speed, boot time... etc.  In every aspect the 7200 is NOTICABLY faster.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679018</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:44:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1270483"><b>spiralspirit</b></A> : dude...HDD time will affect very little except perhaps start up time.  File access times should be approximately the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16679001</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:36:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678998</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1027919"><b>Anonymous_</b></A> : maybe an 7200RPM or higher  would be fine]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678998</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:36:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678995</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Dude what's with the spam?  Put everything in one thread like the rest of us do.<br><br>As to your question, yes they are fine.  5400 RPM is a little slow, but they will still work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678995</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:35:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>My hard drive&#x27;s fast and big enough for Windows Vista???</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1064720"><b>floydb_1982</b></A> : My computer use's three hard drive's;<br><br>1) Maxtor DimondMax 16<br>Formatted capacity: 120 GB<br>Average seek time: &iexcl;&Uuml;12.6 ms<br>Rotational speed: 5,400 RPM<br>2MB cache buffer<br><br>2) Wester Digital Caviar&reg; SE<br>Rotational Speed 7,200 RPM (nominal)<br>Buffer Size 8 MB<br>Average Latency 4.20 ms (nominal)<br>Contact Start/Stop Cycles 50,000 minimum<br>Read Seek Time 8.9 ms<br>Write Seek Time 10.9 ms (average)<br>Track-To-Track Seek Time 2.0 ms (average)<br>Full Stroke Seek 21.0 ms (average)<br>Cylinders 16,383<br>Sectors Per Track 63<br>Formatted Capacity 200,049 MB<br>Capacity 200 GB<br>Interface EIDE 100 MB/s<br>User Sectors Per Drive 390,721,968<br><br>3) External USB 2.0 Fantom<br>Capacity 300 GB<br>Rotational Speed 5,400 RPM<br>Interface USB 60 MB/s<br><br>Are my hard drives Windows Vista ready???]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16678975</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 05:19:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
