<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: DING DONG anyone home?! in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16681889</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:03:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:03:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: DING DONG anyone home?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681889</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1309011"><b>Semi751</b></A> : Latency decreases should be what makes people willing and wanting to sign up for this service.  A decent wiMax setup should net sub 100 ms pings and truthfully sub 80 depending on distance and los.  Definitely not cable but better than the limited options to date.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681889</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:28:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: DING DONG anyone home?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681805</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1115065"><b>amungus</b></A> : likely the sat. broadband will still be expensive, yes.  To those companies (Echostar/DirecTV) it's still just part of the expense...  they don't launch a bird for free either...<br><br>I think it's going to be costly either way denverco100... <br>heck, look how much sat. internet costs now, it's prohibitive for many many people... they see "ooh, look, $60/month, that's not toooo awful bad to pay for what city folk get!" ...then they see that it costs about $600 for equipment and even MORE per month for a more reliable package (pro/business level service) and don't give it a second thought "..nevermind honey, let's just keep that 22.1kbps dialup we got goin' down at the farm..."<br><br>On the other hand, if both companies do this right, the cost could actually be a little cheaper, offer faster service (latency will obviously still be high..) and sign up more new customers.  ...That's probably what I'd want to do if I were Charlie Ergan.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681805</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:16:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>DING DONG anyone home?!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376359"><b>denverco100</b></A> : Umm... this is just another tax on the already overtaxed americans.... <br><br>If the companies didn't have to BUY the spectrum - they might offer the service at a lower rate............<br><br>But since they have to buy the spectrum - it means higher fees for the same service..... so just another tax! You don't really think the companies are going to eat this cost, do you?<br><br>However, an argument could be made that the companies would charge the same price - whether or not they had to buy the spectrum..... and you are probably right..... oh well!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16681557</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:45:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
