site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
81
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

wowok1234

join:2004-07-25
Chicago, IL

1 edit

My view...

My view....

There are only a few mainstream chipsets for 802.11, and even fewer come with Mac drivers. There's Ralink, TI, Broadcom, Atheros, Intersil, and Atmel. This pretty much covers perhaps 98% of all wireless cards for computers. Out of these, Mac OS X includes support for Atheros and Broadcom chipsets, since that is what Apple uses for wireless built into its computers.

While this is a serious issue, consider that most Macs sold since 2003 have had wireless built-in, and Macs since 2000 have had a slot for an Apple-made wireless card. This includes both the desktop line and the notebook line. How likely is it that an average Mac user would purchase a 3rd party (non-Apple) wireless card, plug it into their computer, and install the drivers for it? Not very likely, although there are a few geeks out there that would go for something cheaper. Most people would go for something that is supported by Apple.

Also note that the default for Mac OS X is to ask the user for permission before joining any open wireless AP.


Morac

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Comcast

quote:
Also note that the default for Mac OS X is to ask the user for permission before joining any open wireless AP.
Just of note, that the flaw does not require the user to connect to an AP so it doesn't matter if Mac OS X asks permission or not. If it means anything Windows XP SP2 puts up the same warning.

Monday, 28-May 07:48:43 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics