<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16762836</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:51:40 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:51:40 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16762836</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/811675"><b>cdru</b></A> : Well, technically satellite is wireless...<br><SMALL>--<br>Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16762836</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:33:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16760977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/282779"><b>Jon Geb</b></A> : EVDO pings hang around 120-160ms and when rev A is rolled out next month it will be in 50ms range.<br><br>I have EVDO now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16760977</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:24:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16758009</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/295948"><b>ropeguru</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Omega <A HREF="/useremail/u/665836"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I don't know how this network will work, but it has been my experience that wireless networks have horrible ping time.<br><br>I would much rather have 1.5mbps @ 25-150ms ping than a wireless 100mbps network @ 400ms ping.<br> </DIV>I think you are confusing wireless with satellite. Although satellite is a form of wireless I guess..  :huh:<br><SMALL>--<br>FWD#: 223611</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16758009</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:28:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757699</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/578422"><b>lucky644</b></A> : I've never seen a ping that high unless there was heavy network traffic.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757699</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:42:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757393</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/738406"><b>pbaldwin</b></A> : I'm on a WISP and get 45 ms pings to DSLR all day long. Play games on-line all the time and use Vonage with no problems. It appears you don't quite know what you say. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757393</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:54:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1382661"><b>MZR</b></A> : 400ms ping? are talking about clearw re? then yes...<br>but most WISPs have realy low pings.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757314</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:42:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757189</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054606"><b>wirelesstech</b></A> : I'm looking at my running copy of PingPlotter right now which shows me an average of approximately (I'm eyeballing this) 25ms  across my WISP's network to the edge router at Equinix.<br><br>If you're seeing 400MS then your WISP has you far down the POLLING queue in his access point.  Or something similar, but that's too high a number.<br><br>Shoutout:  Good article, Alex.  Unfortunately I think you're spot-on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757189</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:25:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757056</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1114265"><b>jjgb10</b></A> : Where do you get that a wireless connection has 400ms pings. The only wireless connection that has pings that high is Cell based internet such as EVDO or 1x cell internet. <br><br>Regular wireless internet that uses that 802.11x protocol almost always has ping times from hop to hop of less than 5ms.<br><SMALL>--<br>Check out my business: www.kmcomputers.com</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16757056</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:04:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Speed vs. Ping</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16756944</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/665836"><b>Omega</b></A> : I don't know how this network will work, but it has been my experience that wireless networks have horrible ping time.<br><br>I would much rather have 1.5mbps @ 25-150ms ping than a wireless 100mbps network @ 400ms ping.<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.andrewsbasement.com"> My site</A><BR><br><A HREF="http://ctprofiles.net/891194">CT Profile 60 NE Hunter</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16756944</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:46:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
