site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Matt
All noise, no signal.
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12

reply to Anonymous-1

Re: Sigh

said by Anonymous-1 :

It's not as simple as going to fiber. The reason that AT&T decided to use existing copper (at least for now) in the first place was the cost of the boxes that switch the fiber signal. For FTTP, you need one of these expensive boxes at every home. For FTTN, you need only one for every 100-500 homes (depending on how many homes each node supplies). Also, if you read actual customer reports, they are getting upwards of 75-90 mbps within range and there have been many instances of 25mbps or greater past 25mbps. Uverseusers.com has plenty of good info on this.
Yeah, 75-90mbps at 300ft or so.

»AT&T VDSL: Gateway Sync at 97Mbps
--
I have tried to see things from your point of view, but no matter how hard I try, or what I do, I just can't get my head that far up my ass.


asdfghjklzx5
Premium
join:2004-05-03
kudos:1

»AT&T VDSL: Gateway Sync at 97Mbps



Ignite
Premium,VIP
join:2004-03-18
UK

1 edit

Of course to be fair that isn't actually the sync rate it's an estimated maximum.

That guy is within range anyway, 500m / 1.5kft is 'VDSL2' range. When you go over that the speeds drop fairly rapidly. So if they are infact using existing junction cabinet where does this leave the people at 3kft and above, where VDSL2 offers little speed increase over ADSL2+?

I personally would stick with cable in that instance as I like being able to download at 10Mbit/s or more and be able to run 2 or 3 TVs.

Ah performance will drop nicely too once they have a few lines on each MSAN to crosstalk.

Monday, 28-May 10:21:45 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics