| reply to justbits
Re: Who would have thought? Not entirely quite. The theoretical bandwidth of coax is quite high. This just shakes a little bit extra out of that. Though I believe with DOCSIS 3.0 you'll have to drop in more nodes. I don't believe it's an even swap. |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY | It Costs WHAT! One thing I am thinking is this is going to increase costs because this will require the Hard line and coax drops to the houses used in cable systems to be of higher quality then they are using now. Which is probably why the cableCo's are not singing hosanna in the highest.
--
The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind. |
|
|
|
Reviews:
 ·Bright House
| reply to bogey780
Re: Who would have thought? said by bogey780:Not entirely quite. The theoretical bandwidth of coax is quite high. This just shakes a little bit extra out of that. Though I believe with DOCSIS 3.0 you'll have to drop in more nodes. I don't believe it's an even swap. No, the same nodes will do. If it sells, THEN they might need to add nodes. Don't you just love the innovation timeline cable has taken. In a single decade the bandwidth has tripled, and all while using roughly the same technology. The majority of the equipment changes will be CPE based, and load balancing. This technology will just be a new config for the existing CMTS (and a few upgraded cards, but not many), the Modem just has to be compliant.
--
SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1. |
|
