<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>De Facto Standard in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16795572</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:32:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:32:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>De Facto Standard</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16795572</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : If many people buy these things, and more pre-N wireless equipment made by different companies happens to work together well, then this equipment may bring about a new "standard" based on the sheer size of the installed user base which could make the "actual" 802.11n standard irrelevant.<br><SMALL>--<br>Only SHATNER is Kirk.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16795572</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:28:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
