<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>802.11n Real World Range in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16798033</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:26:07 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:26:07 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 802.11n Real World Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16801003</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : 3x or more what you are seeing with 11b/g if I recall...but the most signif aspect of the improvement is not the "line of sight" distance improvement...it's the "through the obstruction" improvement.<br><br>For example, try to get a WiFi signal across a yard/neighborhood/park dense with trees.<br><br>Make no mistake about it...there are plenty of home users that will welcome .11n <br><br>Not to mention the Muni-WiFi and Campus-WiFi project advantages it will bring.  There would be a whole lot less units & repeaters that would have to go up to cover the desired areas. <br><br>So when those areas dictate .11n then suddenly the average user will have even more incentive to go to .11n for compatibility.<br><br>Of course WiMax may change that whole picture in not too long. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16801003</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:24:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>802.11n Real World Range</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16798033</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312014"><b>expert007</b></A> : I've heard 'range increases', but how much real world range is expected or seen so far from .11n?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16798033</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 22:09:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
