<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Actiontec Router in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16815290</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:44:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:44:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Actiontec Router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16815290</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1386995"><b>UncleDirtNap</b></A> : I like the feature set as well, just wish it was a little more intuitive to use.  I managed to get everything set up the way I wanted but it was a bit of a chore for me and I have a lot of experience with such things - a novice would be sunk I imagine.  Anyway my real gripe, and it's really not that big of an issue, is the size of the thing.  Looking inside through the billion or so ventilation slots and judging from the weight about 80% of the thing is empty space.  Minor quibble though, the end result is a kick ass connection at a pretty sweet price and that's all I really care about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16815290</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 13:02:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Actiontec Router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16804848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The router is designed to have more features than most people need so it can be used for both businesses and residential.  I actually like it and it is far superior in features and throughput than linksys, netgear, or dlink.  Consider the router a lucky bonus.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16804848</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:38:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
